Three Takeaways – Kraken rally again, but come up short in shootout loss to Canucks

by | Jan 3, 2025 | 6 comments

The Komeback Kraken almost did it again to the Vancouver Canucks on Friday, this time rallying from two goals down to send the game to overtime before falling in a shootout for a 4-3 final. The loss came two games after Seattle overcame a three-goal deficit in Vancouver on Saturday and won in OT, something that has only happened two other times in NHL history.

Vince Dunn was one of two big heroes that night (Jaden Schwartz was the other), and he also scored the tying goal Thursday with 53 seconds left in regulation.

“The game is 60 minutes long, and you’ve got to play the whole thing,” Kraken coach Dan Bylsma said. “Sometimes the game goes awry, sometimes you don’t get the bounces, sometimes you don’t get the calls, whatever. That happened for us, and we had to come back again in the third period.”

Here are Three Takeaways from a 4-3 Kraken shootout loss to the Vancouver Canucks.

Takeaway : Is Matty Beniers finally going?

I’ve maintained cautious optimism after the previous couple of games that Matty Beniers had truly gotten off the schneid. He scored in Vancouver on Saturday with a nothing shot that Thatcher Demko flubbed, then scored again against Utah on Tuesday after he missed the net on a breakaway and got a good bounce when he threw it back toward Karel Vejmelka from below the goal line.

This time, he scored a more legitimate-looking power-play goal that cut Seattle’s deficit to 3-2 and set the game up for Dunn’s late heroics.

“I think Matty’s got a huge desire, a huge— I don’t want to call it a burden, but he carries it,” Bylsma said. “He wants to score goals, he wants his line to score goals, and when he’s not, it can wear on him. And just the puck going in in Vancouver [on Saturday], that shot on the rush play, gave him a boost of confidence… He’s playing with a lot more confidence because the puck has gone in the net.”

Hockey is a funny sport like that. Beniers went 19 games without a goal, a drought that lasted more than a month. He had all the chances in the world to score and couldn’t buy a goal. Then, he gets a lucky break, and suddenly the floodgates open.

But will they stay open for him?

Takeaway : A costly turnover

Much has been made of Jaden Schwartz’s performances of late, given that he racked up five points between the game in Vancouver and the game against Utah. He had some fantastic opportunities again on Thursday and got robbed multiple times.

He had a turnover in the neutral zone Thursday, though, that proved to be a turning point in the game and put the Canucks in the driver’s seat. I’m not picking on Schwartz with this because he’s been Seattle’s best player of late, but I think it’s a good example of why taking care of the puck around the blue lines is so critically important.

The Kraken had just dodged a bullet thanks to Philipp Grubauer getting a piece of Conor Garland’s shot on a 2-on-1 rush. Schwartz got the puck near Seattle’s hash marks and carried it out of harm’s way, slowing things down through the neutral zone.

Facing two defenders at the blue line, Schwartz hesitated a second too long and got the puck poked off his stick. It went right to Phil Di Giuseppe, who found Garland again at the blue line, and Garland was off to the races.

I’ve always thought the blue lines are the most dangerous areas on the ice to turn the puck over. When you lose it either at the O-zone or D-zone blue line, your teammates have either shifted into attack mode and are focused on getting up ice, or they think they’re safe to make a line change and start heading to the bench. The transition back to defense often takes a hair too long, and now you’ve given up an odd-man rush or a breakaway.

In this case, it was a Garland breakaway, a shifty move, and a deft finish to give the Canucks their first lead of the game.

Takeaway : A good standings point

The win would have been much nicer, but Seattle continues to show impressive resiliency, even as the odds of making the playoffs have grown long. Facing yet another two-goal deficit, the Kraken did not quit and found another equalizer in dramatic fashion.

It does sting that they didn’t get the winner this time, because they had the puck for most of the overtime period and had some fantastic looks at Kevin Lankinen. Jared McCann had a wraparound that Lankinen stopped and a tip on a Chandler Stephenson shot-pass that went just wide, and Oliver Bjorkstrand had a partial breakaway that Lankinen got his blocker on.

“I thought we possessed it well [in overtime],” Beniers said. “We got some good looks, and [Lankinen] made some big saves.”

Considering how this game seemed to be heading after Tyler Myers made it 3-1 early in the third period, the loser point is well earned by the Kraken.

…But a win would have been better.

Darren Brown

Darren Brown is the Chief Content Officer at soundofhockey.com and the host of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast. He is a member of the PHWA and is also usually SOH’s Twitter intern (but please pretend you don’t know that). Follow him @DarrenFunBrown and @sound_hockey or email darren@soundofhockey.com.

6 Comments

  1. Boist

    Nailed the takeaways. I can definitely get used to Wright-to-Beniers PPGs!!

    Bjorkstrand was snake bitten. He had that breakaway in OT and several other great chances. I love how he has a “shoot” mentality. We need more of that on this team. Both Burky and McCann passed away grade A scoring chances for like a 10% A+ chance. They need to stop doing that. I’m not normally a “shoot!!!” guy from the stands, but the overpassing is infuriating. The teams we play against don’t seem to pass themselves out of scoring chances nearly as often.

    Reply
    • PAX

      Too many touches = turnovers.

      Reply
    • Check Please

      It’s weird. Burakovsky had the one terrible play but otherwise played an outstanding game. I mean, when did he learn to forecheck like that? It was like he was stuck to the puck carrier with Super Glue. You expect that sort of overwhelming pressure from Yanni Gourde, not Andre Burakovsky. More of that, please. On the other hand, Vince Dunn had the one outstanding play but… I can’t be the only one noticing that he has been making some bone-headed plays in the defensive zone lately–turnovers and missed assignments that have led to grade-A scoring opportunities for the opposition. Bylsma has been sending him over the boards to face the other team’s best forwards, and maybe that offensive creativity that Dunn has had to deal with is at least mostly responsible for the lapses. Still, it has seemed to me to contrast sharply with the lock-down defensive zone play that I am used to seeing from Dunn. But what the hell do I know? Maybe it was just about Tocchet changing to a more aggressive two-man forecheck that creates more turnover chances in the second period.

      Reply
  2. PAX

    I was disappointed in the SO effort. I know the players have their own “style” but starting with Bjorkstrand’s slow-but-not-tricky, attempt. Pfft.
    Bummer.

    Reply
  3. RB

    Game started and ended great, but the second period in particular was brutal and they were very very lucky to escape with minimal damage done.

    There were way too many turnovers and takeaways and Vancouver took control of the middle of the ice and pushed the Kraken to the perimeters.

    Schwartz consistently made his way to the front of the net, but the rest of the lines seemed to revert to drifting away and chasing the puck.

    Reply
  4. Boist

    Not sure where to put this but Eduard Sale had a good 5 min interview after Czech beat Canada in the WJC. Seems like a nice guy, I hope he continues to progress in CV.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4aF08wW02vc

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Sound Of Hockey

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading