At the end of February, we reviewed the unrestricted free agents (UFAs). Now that the dust has settled from the trade deadline, we’ll shift our focus to the Seattle Kraken players set to become restricted free agents (RFAs) after this season.
There are three RFAs to consider:
- Kaapo Kakko
- Ryker Evans
- Tye Kartye
Additionally, we’ll discuss forward Mikey Eyssimont, who joined the Kraken via the trade that sent Oliver Bjorkstrand and Yanni Gourde to the Tampa Bay Lightning. Eyssimont will become a UFA at the end of this season.
A critical factor affecting contract negotiations is the NHL salary cap increasing 29 percent over the next three years to $113.5 million by the 2027-28 season. For the 2025-26 season, the cap will increase to $95.5 million. This increase complicates direct dollar-for-dollar contract comparisons. Therefore, I’ll include cap hit percentages to better contextualize contract values.
Kaapo Kakko
Target: Five years at $6 million (approximately six percent of the cap)
Let’s start with the player on everyone’s mind—Kaapo Kakko (whom I’ve playfully nicknamed “Choco Taco” and hope it sticks). This is Kakko’s sixth NHL season, and his current career-best offensive output is 40 points (18 goals, 22 assists) during the 2022-23 season. The Finnish native entered the league with significant expectations as the second overall pick in the 2019 NHL Draft and has been an NHL regular ever since.
Since arriving in Seattle, Kakko has injected noticeable energy into the top line. He has contributed 22 points (six goals, 16 assists) in just 33 games, which projects to roughly 55 points over a full season—which would be a new career high.
Including his earlier time with the New York Rangers this season and with 16 Kraken games remaining, Kakko is on pace for 47 points, which puts him on pace for a new career best.

The big-bodied winger excels at controlling the puck along the boards and driving into the offensive zone and isn’t shy about battling in front of the net. Notably, Kakko’s ice time has increased significantly, rising from 13:17 per game with the Rangers to 17:33 with the Kraken.
This increased ice time has boosted his points per 60 minutes (P/60) from 2.11 in New York to 2.28 in Seattle, ranking him fourth on the team behind Jared McCann (2.37), Jordan Eberle (2.49), and Shane Wright (2.65) as of March 12 for Kraken players with a minimum of 10 games played.
Despite these positives, Kakko remains somewhat unproven given he’s only played 33 games in a Kraken jersey. With only one 82-game season under his belt and being on pace for 79 this season, consistency remain a question. At just 24 years old, Kakko still has plenty of room for growth.
Comparable contracts
Comparable contracts for RFAs who signed through their early UFA years without hitting the 60-point threshold include:
- Adrian Kempe: Four years, $5.5 million average annual value (6.7 percent of an $82.5 million cap)
- Jared McCann: Five years, $5 million AAV (6.1 percent of an $82.5 million cap)
- Pavel Zacha: One-year “prove-it” contract at $3.5 million AAV (4.2 percent of an $83.5 million cap)
- Eeli Tolvanen: Two years, $3.475 million AAV (3.9 percent of an $88 million cap)
- Martin Necas: Two years, $6.5 million AAV (7.4 percent of an $88 million cap)
Prediction
An eight-year deal remains possible, but given Kakko’s track record, a contract similar to Jared McCann’s five-year term seems more likely. A five-year contract between $5.75 million and $6.25 million annually (about six percent of next year’s projected $95.5 million cap) would be logical.
This length would provide Kakko with financial security, earning roughly $30 million, while still allowing him to sign another NHL contract at age 29. While $6 million might initially feel high, it’s consistent with comparable contracts, largely due to the anticipated salary cap increase. A five-year term would also reflect the Kraken paying for Kakko’s projected performance improvements.
Kakko holds arbitration rights, but his modest production to date likely gives the Kraken leverage, potentially leading to a salary lower than this projection. Alternatively, Kakko could choose to bet on himself with a shorter one- or two-year deal at a lower AAV, recognizing the cap will increase significantly—to $104 million by 2026-27 and $113.5 million by 2027-28. A shorter term would let Kakko hit the open market as a UFA as early as next year.
If he pursues a shorter contract, Pavel Zacha and Eeli Tolvanen contracts represent lower-end comparables, though Kakko would command a higher AAV. Expect a short-term contract to fall between five percent and 5.5 percent of the cap, roughly $4.75 million to $5.25 million annually.
This approach would benefit both sides, allowing Kakko to showcase his growth while enabling Seattle to assess his long-term fit and manage risk.
Ryker Evans
Target: Two years at $2.25-$2.75 million (approximately 2.8 percent of the cap)
Ryker Evans is completing his first full NHL season and has solidified himself as a versatile asset. Primarily a third-pairing defenseman with Josh Mahura, Evans frequently steps into higher roles when injuries arise.
He also shows promise quarterbacking the power play, though his opportunities are limited due to being behind Vince Dunn and Brandon Montour in the depth chart.
Evans averages significant ice time at 19:33 per game, notable for a third-pairing defenseman, highlighting the trust placed in him by the coaching staff.

Drafted as Seattle’s second-ever pick at 35th overall in 2021, Evans has justified the Kraken’s selection as an over-ager. Evans has four years of RFA status remaining and is not arbitration eligible, making a bridge contract of one to three years most likely.
Comparable contracts
Comparable contracts for RFA defensemen signed immediately following their entry-level contracts (ELCs), with similar performance levels and expiring during RFA years include:
- Martin Fehervary: Three years, $2.675 million AAV (3.2 percent of an $83.5 million cap)
- Nicolas Hague: Three years, $2.294 million AAV (2.8 percent of an $82.5 million cap)
- Vince Dunn: One year at $1.875 million (2.3 percent of an $81.5 million cap)
Evans’ offensive skill set is similar to Dunn’s, as both are puck-moving defensemen who can quarterback a power play. Evans also contributes on the penalty kill. With the Kraken’s top-four defensemen seemingly locked in for next year, Evans is set to continue developing as the fifth defenseman. He could be preparing for a larger role once Jamie Oleksiak’s contract expires after the 2025-26 season.
Prediction
It feels likely that Evans will sign a bridge deal in the $2.25-$2.75 million range for one to three years, representing 2.5-2.75 percent of the salary cap. If the term were extended to four years, taking him to UFA status, his AAV would increase accordingly. In this scenario, former Seattle Kraken defenseman Will Borgen’s two-year, $2.7 million AAV contract becomes a more relevant comparison.
Borgen’s deal accounted for 3.2 percent of the cap, and Evans’ AAV would likely rise similarly. A four-year contract would likely push his salary into the $3-$3.5 million range, as the Kraken would be paying for additional control over his prime years.
Tye Kartye
Target: Two years at $1.3-$1.5 million (approximately 1.3 percent of the cap)
Tye Kartye joined the Kraken as an undrafted free agent, signing an ELC before the 2022-23 season. After spending one year with the AHL’s Coachella Valley Firebirds, he made an immediate impression during Seattle’s 2023 playoff run when he was called up after Jared McCann was injured by Cale Makar (booooo!).
Primarily utilized in a fourth-line role during his first two seasons with Seattle, there was optimism he’d elevate his offensive game this year, but that has yet to fully materialize. After a solid rookie season with 11 goals and 20 points, Kartye’s production slowed this season, with only eight points in 52 games.
To reignite his game, he had a brief, successful conditioning stint in Coachella Valley, tallying four points (two goals, two assists) in three games. The stint appeared beneficial, as Kartye scored his first Kraken goal in over three months in his first game back.

Kartye’s physical style is a significant asset to his game. He ranks second on the Kraken with 154 hits, trailing only Tolvanen (202). However, when normalized by ice time, Kartye leads the team (minimum 10 games played) with an impressive 18.30 hits per 60 minutes, well ahead of Tolvanen’s 13.17. Kartye consistently brings energy and physicality, making him a fan favorite.
Comparable contracts
- Alexei Toropchenko: Two years, $1.25 million AAV (1.5 percent of an $83.5 million cap)
- Carl Grundstrom: Two years, $1.3 million AAV (1.5 percent of an $82.5 million cap)
- Michael Pezzetta: Two years, $812,500 AAV (1 percent of an $83.5 million cap)
As an RFA, Kartye’s qualifying offer from the Kraken must be at least 105 percent of his current base salary ($775k), equating to a minimum offer of $813,750. Given his contributions, Seattle is likely to offer above this threshold.
Prediction
Kartye turns 24 on April 30, meaning he still has three years of RFA eligibility remaining. Expect the Kraken to provide a moderate raise, resulting in a two-year deal worth around $1.3-$1.5 million annually.
This contract would allow Kartye the opportunity to further develop his offensive potential and provide Seattle a cost-effective, reliable fourth-line player. The ultimate hope is that Kartye evolves into a consistent middle-six winger capable of contributing offensively before negotiating his next contract.
Mikey Eyssimont
Target: One-year extension at $850K-$975K
Though it’s a small sample size of just four games, Mikey Eyssimont has made his presence felt on the Kraken’s fourth line, even chipping in a goal. Eyssimont is a fast skater who consistently gets the puck to the net. Initially viewed as a minor piece in the trade with Tampa Bay, Eyssimont could become an affordable depth option for next season.
With 16 games remaining, the Kraken will use this period to further evaluate Eyssimont’s fit within their system. If his solid play continues, general manager Ron Francis could extend Eyssimont for one year with a modest raise, likely between $850K and $975K. It is possible a second year of term would be required to get the deal done.
A solid group of RFAs
With three pending RFAs this offseason, I anticipate the Kraken will make efforts to retain each player. Given the substantial salary cap increase of $25.5 million expected over the next three years, early negotiations may help the Kraken avoid potential offer sheets, which teams can submit starting July 1. While it’s unlikely another team presents an offer sheet that Seattle wouldn’t match, it’s a scenario worth preparing for.
What do you think the Kraken should do with their RFAs? Would you offer more or less money than what I’ve predicted here, or is there anyone you’d let walk?
Share your thoughts in the comments below!





Nice article for us fans who are closet GM’s. Who do you think about any of the College free agents avail soon getting signed by the Kraken?
I don’t have any necessary objection to Eyssimont, but I feel like he’s getting the benefit of the “shiny new toy” effect that I’m not sure is fair to some of the other players in the team’s system.
Though he’s new to the team, he’s not actually that young. 28, 29 by the beginning of next season. That puts him in the middle-to-upper third of the team age-wise. While he is younger than Hayden (who has been with the organization since 2022) he’s older than Meyers or Mitchell Stephens. All have relatively similar numbers.
Judging from the lineups in CV just prior to the trade deadline, it seems like the plan before he was acquired may have been to bring Logan Morrison back up along with Hayden and Kartye, and that plan had to change when Eyssimont was acquired so Morrison is still sitting down in CV.
Eyssimont just gives them flexibility. He’s an inexpensive fourth-liner who can easily slot in as a healthy scratch, opening spots for CV call-ups. At his AAV, it’s low-risk—they could trade or waive him without concern. Think of him like Megna: capable of filling a bottom-line NHL role when needed, but the Kraken won’t hesitate to sit him.
That said, he’s only played four games, so nothing is set in stone—plus, the shiny new toy effect is definitely in play.
Evans just watched Broberg get 4.5m in an offer sheet. He’s better than Broberg was at the time of the OS. He’s gonna cost way more than 2.5
It’s tricky to compare directly to offer sheets since they often involve overpaying, but it’s certainly possible in Evans’ case. I think it ultimately comes down to term. Defensive value can be tougher to predict, as a lot of their impact doesn’t appear in standard metrics. I wouldn’t be surprised if Evans is able to push as close to the $4M range—but if he gets a Broberg-type offer sheet, the Kraken might be tempted by the compensation (a 1st and 3rd-round pick).
Broberg only cost a 2nd (came in at exactly the limit). 31 teams would easily give up a 2nd for Evans. Borgen was never in Evans’ league. Cheaping out in order to overpay for a Brock Boeser would be negligence
You are correct it was a second round pick, I was looking at an old compensation table. I think anything under 4.58m and under the Kraken would match. But they will try to sign him to a more reasonable amount first.
With the cap on the rise, I think the offer sheet might become a more common occurrence.
If we take the higher end of these, they end up paying $10.5M to these three players. That, along with a Grubauer buyout, leaves them with around $14M in cap space. I’d rather them sit on it and use it to replace Schwartz/Oleksiak/Eberle the following year.
I’m not sure how I feel about this, but I think they are going to take a hard swing at Marner with that 14 m.
I don’t think they’ll be able to get him. Teams like Chicago have more cap space and are extremely desperate.
Free agency was already an inefficient way to get talent, but it’ll get even worse with the sharp cap increase. I’d rather see RF make some trades this offseason for players who already have contracts, like he said he would. He’s had more success making trades than signing UFAs (Grubauer and Burky being the most obvious notable disasters).
I’d like to see them take a run at Peterka.
It is possible, but how much do you think the Kraken would need to offer so Buffalo would not match? Then figure in the draft pick compensation and it will get expensive quick.
I don’t think it’s an offer sheet. There are 13 teams he could sign with as of right now but I think just the threat means they’re going to be looking for a trade.
I don’t know just what Buffalo is looking for but an NHL player, one of their firsts, and a prospect… depending on the names, I could see a deal there.
I don’t see many (any?) Kraken player that is easy to move (i.e. no NMC) and would interest/fit the Sabres. Unless you trade say Dunn or McCann elsewhere and use part of the return in a package for Peterka. Peterka will interest a lot of teams no doubt so that could become an expensive trade and cap hit.
Tolvanen. No protection.
Fleury is playing again tonight. If I’m reading the group VI definition correctly, 8 more games this season and he’ll also be an RFA.
Hold on… you want to give KK $6M a year, as in, get paid more than JMac, when he has yet to surpass 45-points in a season, but has played almost 400 games? See, Ron Francis would give you a job on his staff immediately.
Kakko should get a deal in the ballpark of Tolvanen, he needs to prove that he is a legit middle-6 producer. 2 years at $4M per year. That doubles his money on a two-year prove it deal.
I am actually okay with your prediction on Evans, though I do think he’s defensively horrid sometimes. But two years at $2.25/yr and his offensive upside means he is moveable at any time.
Kartye on a two year deal just over a mil per season makes sense to me, but he’s going to have to have to produce more than he is now.
I don’t see us signing Eyssimont. I think there are better fourth line options out there and think he just takes up a roster spot but doesn’t fill a need.
There is literally NO REASON why the Kraken would re-sign Fleury unless his dad is pulling strings or something. The kid is atrocious on his feet. He can barely do a crossover. I don’t get it, haven’t gotten it since day one. I think we should be giving Ottaveinen time not Fleury but… then again the roster decisions this team has made since day one make no sense so… at least it’s consistently inconsistent.