Kraken Contracts Corner: Camp cuts and grades for the Douglas and Melanson signings

Kraken Contracts Corner: Camp cuts and grades for the Douglas and Melanson signings

On Monday, Sep. 21, the Kraken announced the first wave of Training Camp cuts and reassignments. In today’s edition of Kraken Contracts Corner, we’ll break down those moves and then pick up with Part II of our two-part series grading the Seattle Kraken’s significant offseason signings. We’ll then conclude with a few other contract odds and ends you need to know as the Kraken continue preparing for the season.

Seattle Kraken trim camp roster to 27 players

After two preseason games that gave the coaching staff an opportunity to see several of the team’s prospects up close, the Kraken announced a number of transactions Monday morning that trimmed the NHL Training Camp roster.

Following those moves, there are 23 “veterans” still in camp, including “roster-bubble” veterans Curtis Douglas, Ben Meyers, Jacob Melanson, Cale Fleury, and Josh Mahura. There are also four younger players still with the NHL team: Oscar Fisker Mølgaard, Jake O’Brien, Ville Ottavainen, and Nikke Kokko. I suspect that Mølgaard is the only player in the younger group who has a chance to stick around and displace a veteran on the initial roster, absent an injury.

Going through the transactions, the Kraken reassigned defensemen Finn Kearns, Rylan Singh, and Will Reynolds to their junior clubs, as expected. The team also released Brody Gillespie and Maks Corovic from their Rookie Camp tryouts. Gillespie and Corovic will rejoin their respective junior clubs, too, and again be draft eligible in 2027.

The Kraken’s other moves are intended to send players to the Coachella Valley Firebirds. The following 16 players are waivers-exempt and were assigned to the AHL directly:

D Alexis BernierD Tyson JugnauthF Carson Rehkopf
D Lukas DragicevicF Andrei LoshkoF Lleyton Roed
F Ryden EversF Julius MiettinenF Eduard Sale
F Jagger FirkusD Ty NelsonF Nathan Villeneuve
F David GoyetteF Jani Nyman
D Kaden HammellD Caden Price

It was surprising to see some of these players sent down so early, but this is a product of the shorter Training Camp this season.

The most interesting transactions are the players who, due to age and service time, require waivers to be assigned to the Firebirds:

F J.R. AvonF Logan Morrison
F John HaydenG Victor Ostman

Other teams have a 24-hour window to claim any one of these players off waivers. If unclaimed, the players will report to Firebirds camp. Ottavainen will also require waivers if he does not make the NHL team, as would any of the bubble “veterans” listed above. O’Brien, Mølgaard, and Kokko are waivers-exempt.

Finally, the following four players are signed to AHL contracts and will now report directly to Firebirds camp following their release from NHL camp agreements:

F Justin JanickeD Gustav Olofsson
F Ian McKinnonF Mitchell Stephens

Grading the offseason signings

Curtis Douglas signs a two-year, $1.25 million AAV UFA contract on signed Jul. 1, 2026

The takeaway

Rugged forward depth and roster competition at a bubble NHL-AHL rate.

Details

Market analysis

Douglas was a “Group Six” unrestricted free agent on Jul. 1. Most often, a player becomes an unrestricted free agent when his contract first expires after his 27th birthday. Douglas, 26, became a free agent earlier because he was over 25 years old, had played more than three “professional seasons,” and had accumulated fewer than 80 NHL games.

For our comparables, we looked at unrestricted free agents between 25 and 29 years old with at least 20 NHL games played but fewer than five goals and 10 points in their last season preceding free agency. Since much of what Douglas trades on is his physicality, we also required that the player have at least 30 hits in that season. (Douglas had 64 for the Canucks last season in 43 combined games between the Tampa Bay Lightning and Vancouver Canucks.)

This returned a list of 28 comparable contracts from the last four offseasons. The deals averaged 1.5 years in length and were valued near the league minimum at 1.1 percent of the Year 1 salary cap. The Kraken gave Douglas a two-year contract at 1.2 percent of the cap. Both figures are just slightly above average, meaning favorable to the player.

Context analysis

The Kraken clearly valued Douglas’s very specific physical profile. In a way, it’s hard to separate the Douglas signing from the next one we’ll discuss, Jacob Melanson. They will likely push each other for the same checking role, and the loser may find himself on the outside of the NHL roster looking in. I suspect the team would prefer that Melanson emerges victorious and Douglas is AHL depth, but Douglas at least protects against a “sophomore slump” for Melanson. Both players have the same marching orders (whether express or not): Play sound defensive hockey, but protect the team’s top young players when necessary.

If Douglas does not make the NHL team, Douglas would require waivers to go to the AHL. The two-year term could dissuade a potential claimant. If or when Douglas is in the AHL, he would only count $50,000 against the Year 1 NHL salary cap, with the remainder “buried” in the minors.

Grade: C+

Even if the term or value may be slightly high, it was likely necessary to secure the player. We are essentially talking about rounding errors in the big picture. And one could argue it’s really a one-year deal because Douglas’s contract could be fully buried in the AHL for the 2027-28 season without cap consequence.

Jacob Melanson signs a three-year, $1.45 million AAV RFA contract on Sep. 4, 2026

The takeaway

Finding precedents for this contract is difficult. It’s a unique contract for a uniquely physical player.

Details

Market analysis

Melanson has played in only 37 NHL games, with 36 of them coming last season. He has two goals and three assists at the NHL level, all during the 2025-26 season. At the AHL level, he has played parts of three seasons, never topping 19 points in any campaign.

Typically, when a 23-year-old restricted free-agent forward with this resume goes to the negotiating table, he is bargaining for guarantees on a two-way contract or maybe a multi-year term.

We know Melanson’s case is different. Scoring really isn’t his value proposition. He is a fourth-line forechecker, and his speed and physicality do create advantages for his team when he is out there. Teams rarely pay for that skill set, though. The player has to be special in his contributions. Brandon Tanev is a player who earned a big contract playing this way, but the examples are few and far between.

Over the last four seasons, there were 16 contracts for RFA forwards aged 21 to 26 with 20 or more NHL games but fewer than five goals and five assists in their last season before the contract. Until June 2026, none of those contracts were worth more than $1,000,000 annually or more than 1.02 percent of the cap. Only four players had received three-year contracts, with the rest two- or one-year terms.

Between June and Melanson’s signing in September, however, two interesting contracts were signed:

  • Zach Ostapchuk signed with the Sharks in June for four years and 2.26 percent of the cap; he had four goals and three assists in 59 NHL games last season.
  • Ville Koivunen signed with the Penguins in August for eight years and 3.85 percent of the cap; he had two goals and five assists in 39 NHL games last season.

Koivunen is a different kind of player; the Penguins are clearly betting long-term on middle-six scoring upside after the player posted 56 points in the AHL in 2024-25 and 41 points in 34 AHL games last season. Melanson is unlikely to score like that.

Ostapchuk may be a more revealing comparison, though. Similar in age to Melanson, he also fits more of a checking profile, with 140 hits in 2025-26. Though this falls well short of Melanson’s hit rate (more on this in a moment), it’s notable physicality. Beyond that, Ostapchuk has a longer track record than Melanson, with 122 total NHL games played.

All told, even when accounting for Koivunen and Ostapchuk, Melanson’s comparable contracts were for 2.4 years and 1.18 percent of the cap. Melanson signed well above those marks, getting a three-year deal worth 1.39 percent of the cap.

Why? Melanson’s money-maker is his physicality. Melanson’s career mark of 33.2 hits per 60 minutes leads all NHL players with at least 10 games played going back at least 50 years. (I stopped looking at that point.) His 33.5 hits per 60 minutes last season led the league and would have led any individual season going back at least 10 years among all players with at least 10 games played. (I stopped looking at that point.) You get the idea.

This makes him such a unique case. How does the league value this type of physicality from a young restricted free agent? We just don’t have recent precedent for it. Ostapchuk is our best evidence that other teams are willing to pay for it like Seattle did here.

Melanson will still be a restricted free agent with arbitration rights when this deal expires in 2029.

Context analysis

Melanson’s value may ebb and flow depending on the matchup and flow of a game, but he has the ability to change a game’s course with a high-energy shift or bone-crunching hit. There’s no other forward on the roster (except for perhaps Douglas, now) who can do that. It makes him a good fit as the team’s 12th (or perhaps 13th) forward. His relative youth also works in his favor. The team surely hopes he’ll be able to hold up his physical play for at least the next three years.

While it is a “big” contract for the type of player Melanson is, it’s also a very modest sum in the grand scheme and won’t prevent the team from doing anything else it wants to do contract-wise.

Grade: C+

This deal seems like a concession by the Kraken in the direction of unique contract demands by a unique player. The Kraken didn’t “win” the deal, but it’s also not necessary to do so. Squeezing every penny on these restricted free-agent deals may not always be the right play—particularly so given the team’s ample cap space—when the downside is alienating the player.

Contract odds and ends

  • Assuming he is not claimed, goalie Victor Ostman will play this season in Coachella Valley on a one-year contract. After the season ends, he will be a Group Six unrestricted free agent unless the Kraken re-sign him sooner or he plays in 26 NHL games this season (adding to his two previous NHL games).
  • The rule change allowing 19-year-old first-round picks from the CHL to play in the AHL will be in effect for this coming season. Jake O’Brien is almost certain to be the Kraken’s first such assignment taking advantage of this rule.
  • Teams had until 11:59 p.m. on Sept. 15 to sign players to contracts under the previous CBA. Since that time, certain deal structures are no longer allowed. The maximum term for re-signing a team’s own player is now seven years, not eight. And certain front-loaded and bonus-heavy deal structures are no longer permissible. Unlike several other teams around the league, the Kraken did not get any last contracts “under the wire.” The players who were technically eligible for such a deal included Jared McCann, Vince Dunn, Ryker Evans, Shane Wright, and Philipp Grubauer.

Curtis Isacke

Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.

Grading the Seattle Kraken’s offseason signings: McMann and Samoskevich

Grading the Seattle Kraken’s offseason signings: McMann and Samoskevich

On Sept. 4, the last of the Seattle Kraken’s restricted free agents, Jacob Melanson, signed a contract with the team. Though additional signings could still come during Training Camp and into the regular season, of course, it seems Seattle’s summer business has now come to a close.

What better time for a quick trip to “Kraken Contract Corner“? Across two posts (because I’m too verbose), we’ll mainly investigate how the Kraken fared in its four most significant summer free-agent signings. In Part II, we’ll address the Curtis Douglas and Melanson signings and conclude with a few rapid-fire contract notes to file away as we approach the 2026-27 regular season.

Let’s dive in to Part I. Check back soon for Part II.

Bobby McMann

Six-year, $5.75 million AAV UFA contract, signed Jul. 1, 2026

The takeaway

The profile brings risk, but the contract is fairly consistent with the limited historical precedent for a late-blooming player like McMann. The average value is reasonable, particularly in this ascending-cap environment. The team likely views McMann as a necessary firewall against offensive failure—even if some in the fanbase could argue that is a bug, not a feature.

Details

Market analysis

There are a few different ways of looking at McMann’s market value.

The first method is to look at his last year before free agency in historical context. McMann scored 29 goals and added 17 assists in the 2025-26 season and hit free agency at age 30. He then received a six-year contract worth 5.53 percent of the Year 1 salary cap from Seattle. (Note that we’ll use cap percentage rather than raw dollar figures in our analysis of contracts to account for the shifting salary cap context.)

Over the last four years, unrestricted free-agent forwards between ages 28 and 32 who scored between 24 and 34 goals and had between 36 and 56 total points in their free-agency season secured contracts that averaged 4.4 years in length and 6.47 percent of the Year 1 cap. (The average age of these players was close to McMann’s current age.) This makes the trade-off simple: McMann got more term (and financial security) in exchange for below-average value—particularly given the fact that it is now apparent the cap will be escalating for the foreseeable future.

Yet, that pool of players differed from McMann starkly in their overall track record. McMann is a notorious late bloomer. He has played 218 NHL games, posting 64 goals and 41 assists. The most “similar” player in this first comparable pool is Pius Suter, who had played 364 games, scored 82 goals, and added 80 assists. The “average” player in this group almost triples McMann’s marks (602 NHL games, 164 goals, 188 assists).

The shorter track record suggests there could be greater risk and variability in McMann’s potential outcomes than would be typical of the pool generally. If we were to look at comparables for similarly aged free-agent forwards based only on their career numbers as they entered unrestricted free agency, we end up with a wildly different result. Among forwards aged 28-32 with career marks at or below 340 games, 100 goals, and 100 assists, McMann’s comparables averaged just 1.9 years of term and 1.57 percent of the Year 1 cap.

How about a middle-ground approach that searches for players with lesser career records, but similarly strong free-agency years? I searched again using the same career thresholds but adding in a requirement of 20-plus goals in the free-agency year. Here, we narrowed our list to only three recent examples.

  • Kiefer Sherwood signed with the Sharks this offseason for five years, 5.53 percent of the cap, with 66 goals and 68 assists in 337 career games.
  • Ilya Mikheyev signed with the Canucks in 2022 for four years, 5.76 percent of the cap, despite a career track record of only 146 games played, 36 goals, and 36 assists.
  • Michael Bunting signed with the Carolina Hurricanes in 2023 for three years and 5.39 percent of the cap, with 57 goals and 69 assists in 187 career games.

With an average of 5.56 percent of the cap and four years of term, teams got a modest AAV discount and very little term discount on these short-track-record players compared with our first sample.

How does McMann stack up? Sherwood’s contract is very similar—one year shorter, but Sherwood is a year older than McMann. Arguably, McMann had a better free-agent season (29 goals) than both Mikheyev (21) and Bunting (23), but Mikheyev and Bunting were both 28 at signing, two full years younger than McMann.

Assuming for the sake of argument these context factors more or less cancel out, McMann received a Year 1 cap percentage right in line with this micro-market of late-blooming scorers, but also received more term. This is likely where the negotiation focused and was the area where the Kraken gave ground to secure the deal.

How have Bunting and Mikheyev fared since signing their deals? Bunting has played for an eye-popping four teams during the original three years of his free-agent deal, though he continued to chip in offensively, averaging 17.3 goals per season. Mikheyev has also moved teams, spending two years in Vancouver and two in Chicago during his contract. He averaged 15.5 goals per season.

Context analysis

McMann is an auxiliary scoring forward on the far side of his 30th birthday. One could reasonably ask whether a building team should be signing this type of player. At the same time, one must ponder whether the Kraken view themselves as a building team or a borderline playoff club, for which marginal scoring is highly significant.

Assuming the goal is to deploy the strongest NHL team you can and compete for the playoffs, McMann projects to provide strong goal-scoring “value” relative to dollars spent in the short term—though the Bunting and Mikheyev case studies suggest that our expectations may overshoot the likely reality.

The term is lengthy by any metric we evaluated above. That said, the contract’s cap percentage will continue to tumble over time and should be low enough that the deal is relatively easily tolerated or moved in years 4-6, when McMann has only a 10-team no-trade list.

Grade: B

It’s hard to give this move a “good” or “bad” mark given the complexity of the situation. The Kraken operated within the general market confines, and your opinion on the deal likely turns on the “vision” question surrounding the signing.

Mackie Samoskevich

Three-year, $3.85 million AAV RFA contract, signed Jul. 1, 2026

The takeaway

The contract offers short-term value for an ascending restricted free agent. It also sets up one more negotiation for a big-money contract extension before Samoskevich hits unrestricted free agency.

Details

Market analysis

Before signing, Samoskevich was a 23-year-old restricted free agent with arbitration rights. Last season with Florida, Samoskevich had 12 goals and 20 assists. Using a sample of 22-to-25-year-old restricted free agents with between eight and 16 goals and 12 and 28 assists in their pre-contract seasons, we arrived at a pool of 24 comparable player contracts over the last four seasons. The pool averaged 3.25 years in term and 3.28 percent of the Year 1 cap. Samoskevich’s contract was three years and 3.7 percent of the Year 1 cap.

Though the value came in just slightly “above market,” it strikes me as fair given (1) the clear, ascending cap environment relevant to years 2 and 3, and (2) the fact that the player’s true production level was potentially role-suppressed on a Stanley Cup-caliber team.

Context analysis

Samoskevich is a pre-prime, ascending player on a very modest contract. He fits on any team, and, as I have argued, is a terrific fit for this year’s Kraken team whether it makes a playoff run or not. If he stays healthy, there is little doubt he will provide surplus value over the term of the deal. The question is how much.

The public second-guessing of the Samoskevich deal came with the term. Should the Kraken have tried to lock Samoskevich into a longer-term deal now? With the benefit of hindsight, one can also look at ensuing long-term contracts for barely established players like Noah Ostlund, Braden Bowman, and Fraser Minton and wonder if Seattle miscalculated.

That said, at the time Seattle signed Samoskevich, the vast majority of his comparables signed “bridge” contracts in the two-to-four-year range just like Samoskevich did. The scoring production of players in this range just leaves too much profile uncertainty for the player and team to see eye-to-eye on long-term value.

Only four of his comparables—Anton Frondell (six years), Logan Stankoven (eight years), Frank Nazar (seven years), and Matt Boldy (seven years)—had signed true long-term deals. It would be wise to hesitate in comparing Samoskevich to any of these players, aside from perhaps Nazar. At the time, though, it would have been easy enough to consider the Nazar deal an outlier.

Samoskevich will still be a restricted free agent when the contract ends, which affords the team the opportunity to negotiate a long-term deal beginning in July, 2028.

Grade: B+

The deal falls within the range of expectation, but as an RFA deal, it should return significant value for the team. More players and contracts like this would move the needle for the Kraken.

* * *

What do you think about these deals? Any other questions for your Kraken contracts corner correspondent? Let us know in the comments below or on X/Twitter or BlueSky at Sound_Hockey or Deepseahockey.

Curtis Isacke

Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.