The Seattle Kraken answered one of their biggest offseason questions on Thursday when they announced that Lane Lambert had been hired to become the third head coach in franchise history. We expect Lambert to be formally introduced to the market next week, so we will surely have more coverage of the hiring coming down the pike, in addition to what John Barr published on Thursday. So, stay tuned for more on that front.
While we were waiting for that major personnel decision, we also got to thinking about how newly appointed general manager Jason Botterill can improve his team’s on-ice performance this offseason. Curtis Isacke laid out what he thinks should be the team’s top priorities in a fantastic piece from Wednesday, so give that a read if you haven’t.
In his end-of-season press conference, Botterill alluded to seeking more players (and a coach, for that matter) who can help the team get to the front of the net in the offensive end and do a better job of protecting that same area in the defensive zone. To us at Sound Of Hockey, this screams more Jaden Schwartz-types, but also younger.
Adding one or more players like that—a tall task in and of itself—should make the team more competitive, but it likely won’t be enough on its own. As has been the case since the team’s inception, there remains an obvious dearth of star power at the top of Seattle’s lineup. There still is no one player who can—when the chips are down—put the team on his back and go get the desperately needed goal, even when he’s not having his best night or the team looks like it’s skating in quicksand.
How do the Kraken get such a player? One route requires patience: drafting and developing. Seattle has drafted well over its first four years, and it is possible that a home-grown forward like Matty Beniers, Shane Wright, or Berkly Catton could grow into a star offensive producer. But if that comes to fruition for any of the three, it will still take at least a couple of years—and in the case of Catton, he’s likely four or more seasons from becoming a reliable scorer at the NHL level.
It’s no secret the organization wants to become competitive immediately, though, so how can the front office expedite its improvement? Well, the other routes are through trade, free agency, or the rarely executed offer sheet. The Kraken made a couple of splashy signings last summer in Chandler Stephenson and Brandon Montour, and they could look to do that again this summer. The free agent class is relatively thin, but it is buoyed by one big-time, elite winger highlighting the top of the group: Mitch Marner.
At face value, Marner doesn’t even really fit the mold of what the Kraken are purportedly looking for, but landing a player like him would instantly improve the offense. Could they do it? Should they? Let’s investigate.
Mitch Marner is a bona fide star
The Toronto Maple Leafs are a team in flux after they were bounced from the second round of the Stanley Cup Playoffs by the defending Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers in seven games. In 13 postseason games across two series, Marner was second on the team in scoring with 13 points (2-11=13), behind only William Nylander (6-9=15).
One would think that a hometown product who grew up idolizing the Leafs, led a star-studded roster during the regular season with a whopping 102 points (27-75=102), and then put up a point-per-game in the playoffs would have earned some grace from the Toronto fanbase.
Instead, as the Panthers embarrassed the Maple Leafs for the second time in three games, closing them out with a 6-1 spanking that left Toronto’s fans wanting back the thousands of dollars they spent on Game 7 tickets, Marner was booed. With his contract set to expire after the season, Marner—in what may end up being his final game for his beloved hometown team—was booed by the Maple Leafs fans.
Although Marner’s exit from the so-called “Center of the Hockey Universe” is still not a foregone conclusion—he could still end up re-signing there—calls for change in the market have led to Brendan Shanahan’s ouster as the team’s president, and a desire for a shakeup to the roster could very well lead to a divorce between Marner and the Leafs. Leafs GM Brad Treliving added some fuel to that speculation when he said in his season-end press conference that “there’s some DNA that has to change in our team” this offseason.
Despite the sentiments of the home crowd in Toronto, which seems to have grown tired of the “Core Four” of Auston Matthews, Nylander, Marner, and John Tavares falling short of their sky-high expectations, there is no denying that Marner is a superstar player who will immediately elevate the team that lands him this offseason (assuming he does move).
Marner, 28, was the fourth-overall pick of the Leafs in the 2015 NHL Draft. He quickly emerged as a budding star, scoring 61 points (19-42=61) as a rookie in 2016-17, the same season Matthews debuted and racked up 40 goals and 29 assists. Since then, Marner has done nothing but produce, averaging 1.13 points per game over nine seasons.
2024-25 was Marner’s first time breaching the 100-point mark in a season, though he hit 97 (35-62=97) and 99 (30-69=99) in 2021-22 and 2022-23. Fast, creative, and shifty, Marner—sometimes overshadowed by Matthews for his goal-scoring prowess—is a top talent in the NHL.
What would it take to land Marner?
With more than $20 million in projected cap space and the ability to create more if needed, the Kraken are well positioned to make an offer to Marner that could carry the largest average annual value in NHL history, somewhere in the seven-year, $14 million range. That would put him ahead of Matthews, who currently holds the highest annual salary at $13.25 million.
There’s also suddenly an obvious connection between Marner and the Kraken via the hiring of Lambert, who spent last season as an associate coach for the Leafs. We can’t help but wonder how Lambert’s relationship is with Marner…
The problem is that if Marner does hit the market when free agency opens on July 1, there are many teams in the NHL that will want his services and will be willing to pay out the nose to acquire them. Is Seattle a desirable destination for a player of Marner’s ilk? That remains to be seen. Without being able to position themselves as proven winners, Botterill and the Kraken front office would face an uphill battle in proving to Marner that their vision for the future is one that will bring him sustained success through what could be the remainder of his career.
While most in the NHL laud the Kraken facilities and organization as “first class,” will the massive dollars and promise of future wins (as opposed to past ones) be enough to lure Marner to move 2,500 miles across the continent?
Should the Kraken try to land Marner?
Bad decisions in free agency can kill a franchise and make a front office look silly for years, especially when we’re talking about the level of financial investment and salary cap commitment that Marner will require. Plus, is Marner even really a fit for Seattle? The team has more playmakers than goal scorers, and although Marner has scored 221 goals in his career, this is not his primary skill. He also doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s going to battle his way into the dirty areas at either end of the ice, something Botterill said he wants to focus on adding this offseason.
Those are some reasons why the Kraken may opt to pass on the theoretical Marner sweepstakes, if they even come to fruition. Yet, with all these things in mind, and even with the unlikelihood of Marner coming to the Pacific Northwest, we at Sound Of Hockey still think it’s worth a try.
Marner would be the best player to hit the open market since Artemi Panarin did in 2019, so if the Kraken want to sprinkle in elite talent and make a big step toward contention, this is the fastest way to do it. Mitch Marner types simply do not become available.
What say you, folks? Would you try to sign Marner?
Darren Brown
Darren Brown is the Chief Content Officer at soundofhockey.com and the host of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast. He is a member of the PHWA and is also usually SOH’s Twitter intern (but please pretend you don’t know that). Follow him @DarrenFunBrown and @sound_hockey or email darren@soundofhockey.com.
The Seattle Kraken have named Lane Lambert as the third head coach in franchise history, the team announced Thursday. Lambert, 60, brings a wealth of NHL experience to the franchise, both behind the bench and as a former player.
Lambert most recently served as an associate coach with the Toronto Maple Leafs during the 2024-25 season, working under head coach Craig Berube. Before that, he held the head coaching role with the New York Islanders for parts of two seasons from 2022-23 through 2023-24. He was replaced by Patrick Roy on January 20, 2024, after compiling a 61-46-20 record (.559 points percentage) in 127 games as the Islanders’ bench boss. At the time of his departure, the Islanders were 19-15-11 (.557), hovering around the Eastern Conference playoff picture.
Born in Melfort, Saskatchewan, Lambert played 283 NHL games across six seasons with the Detroit Red Wings, New York Rangers, and Quebec Nordiques. Following his playing career, Lambert built an extensive coaching résumé, including a long tenure as an assistant under Barry Trotz with the Nashville Predators, Washington Capitals, and New York Islanders. His time in Washington culminated in a Stanley Cup championship in 2018, when he served as an assistant coach during the Capitals’ Stanley Cup run.
Although Lambert does not have extensive ties to the current Seattle Kraken roster, he was part of the Islanders’ coaching staff during the tenure of current Kraken captain Jordan Eberle, who played on Long Island from the 2014-15 to 2020-21 seasons. That existing familiarity could help establish early communication and leadership dynamics as Lambert transitions into lead his new team.
“After conducting an extensive search, we’re thrilled to announce Lane as our new head coach,” said Kraken General Manager Jason Botterill in a team statement. “We cast a wide net for suitable candidates. What impressed us throughout the interview process was Lane’s strategy and vision for this team. He was an integral part of the Capitals winning the Cup and the Islanders advancing to two straight Eastern Conference finals. We have full confidence in Lane to lead this team behind the bench.”
Lambert replaces Dan Bylsma, who was relieved of his duties on April 21, 2025, after just one season behind the Kraken bench. Bylsma led the team to a 35-41-6 record, which fell short of expectations, particularly after the team’s two big free agent signings last summer. Bylsma was named head coach last summer, replacing the Kraken’s first head coach, Dave Hakstol, who went 107-112-27. Hakstol coached the Kraken to their first playoff appearance in 2022-23, which included the a first-round playoff series victory over the defending champion Colorado Avalanche.
As the Kraken enter their fifth NHL season, Lambert will be tasked with continuing the development of key young players such as Matty Beniers, Shane Wright, Jani Nyman, and Berkly Catton, while also guiding the team back to playoff contention. With a mix of emerging talent and established veterans, the expectation is not just growth, but meaningful progress toward becoming a consistent postseason threat. Lambert’s ability to balance player development with immediate results will be central to Seattle’s next phase. It is expected Lambert will round out his coaching staff over the next few months.
As Seattle Kraken fandom awaits white smoke rising from the Kraken Community Iceplex signaling the appointment of a new head coach, the front office has been hard at work developing an offseason plan for player acquisition as well. General manager Jason Botterill told Kraken season ticket holders last Thursday that the team had recently completed its pro personnel meetings. The team has its list of free agent and trade targets in hand.
With that work done, the Kraken have been implementing their plans. Botterill indicated that the team has already contacted restricted free agents Kaapo Kakko, Ryker Evans, and Tye Kartye expressing interest in new deals for those players. More concretely, the team re-signed unrestricted free agent forward John Hayden to a two-year, league-minimum deal on Wednesday.
Now, a significant offseason landmark is right around the corner. With the NHL Draft shifting to a “remote” format this year, the 2025 NHL Draft Scouting Combine, which begins on Sunday, June 1, will be the only offseason event that will bring most of the league’s top decision makers together. Many around the league expect that teams will use the combine to discuss potential trades and seek team “permission” to contact pending free agents.
So, the “real” work of offseason is just days away. With that in mind, there is no better time to examine what lies ahead in this critical period. In this part one, we’ll get into where Seattle stands and where its offseason priorities should be. In part two, we’ll return with a look at the options on the market that are both realistically available and intriguing fits to fill Seattle’s needs. We’ll conclude with a “mock offseason” to show one scenario of how these pieces could fit together. Let’s dive in.
Kraken offseason roster status
Assuming, for the moment, that all of Seattle’s young players on entry-level deals—aside from Shane Wright—will be in the AHL or another non-NHL level, the Kraken enter the offseason with $21 million of space under the projected $95.5 million salary cap for 2025-26. They have nine forwards, four defensemen, and two goalies under contract. With an assist from CapWages, here is what Seattle’s salary cap sheet looks like right now.
Forwards Kaapo Kakko, Tye Kartye, and Ben Meyers are restricted free agents, with Kakko and Meyers both being one year away from unrestricted free agency and possessing arbitration rights. On defense, Ryker Evans and Cale Fleury are restricted free agents, with Fleury being one year from unrestricted status and having arbitration rights.
There was some uncertainty publicly about whether Meyers and Fleury would be Group-Six Unrestricted Free Agents given their NHL service time. I can report that is not the case. Each remains a restricted free agent, in Fleury’s case owing to service time rules from the COVID-affected seasons.
Forward Michael Eyssimont is scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent on July 1, as is defenseman Josh Mahura. Several depth pieces are pending unrestricted free agents too, including goalie Ales Stezka and defenseman Gustav Olofsson.
It is also important to remember the pieces the team already subtracted before the trade deadline, when the team shipped out defenseman Will Borgen, and forwards Oliver Bjorkstrand, Yanni Gourde, and Brandon Tanev. Each of those players are NHL-level contributors, with the subtraction of Bjorkstrand in particular being significant for the offense.
Overall this season, Seattle posted middle-of-the-pack overall offensive production (16th of 32 NHL teams in total goals scored) and shooting percentage (14th highest) and did well staying out of the penalty box (fifth-fewest penalty minutes) and avoiding goals against on the power play (second fewest), but struggled in almost every other metric conceivable. Leveraging standard and advanced data from Evolving Hockey, here is where Seattle stacked up in various metrics:
The trade losses are somewhat mitigated going into the offseason by the acquisition of Kakko, but I think it’s fair to say that absent dramatic leaps from Seattle’s young players, the team is in a relatively weaker position now, both offensively and defensively, than it was when Seattle’s lineup was fully healthy early last season.
Looking back, it is easy to recall the preseason narratives. The Kraken would continue to be staunch defensively, buoyed by the addition of Brandon Montour, and would get back to their identity of a relentless, depth-based attack, with few “fourth lines” capable of matching Gourde, Tanev, and Kartye. As we all know, it didn’t work out that way. For example, that intimidating “fourth line” combined for just 47 points all season with Seattle.
So, the Kraken need to add pieces just to get back to this past year’s baseline—a standard that was, itself, disappointing to all involved. Additions on top of that will be necessary to push this team toward contention. No wonder, then, that the team has vowed to be “aggressive” in making roster changes for the second consecutive offseason.
Yanni Gourde and Brandon Tanev (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Kraken offseason priorities
If we were penciling out a Kraken depth chart today, it might look something like the following. (As a disclaimer, these aren’t projected lines, and I wouldn’t put much stock in the actual order. The goal is just to display the team’s depth.)
Extrapolating from this depth chart, in the context of existing roster performance laid out above, I’ve identified the following seven personnel-related offseason priorities. (For the moment I’ll set aside the two most pressing agenda items, neither of which are personnel-related: Finding a head coach and fixing the defensive approach.)
Priority No. 1: Make a splash move
Under then-general manager Ron Francis, Seattle built a solid base of talent, organizational depth, and upcoming draft capital. Now comes Botterill and the 2025 offseason, and the goals are different. “It’s my job to go out there, whether it’s free agency or making trades, to drop in elite talent,” Botterill said.
This is the top priority. Whatever the position, whatever the means, Seattle’s focus should be on adding a “game-plan player,” a player the opposition needs to account for in their pre-scout; a player that can drag the team back into the game with a single skilled play, even on a night when everything else is going wrong. (No, unfortunately, it is not going to be Daniel Sprong.)
With a solid prospect pool and 10 picks in the first two rounds of the next three drafts, Botterill and the Kraken have the assets to make it happen. That is not the challenge. “You never know what trade is going to come, but we’re going to at least be in the discussion with those [extra first-round picks] moving forward,” Botterill explained.
The challenge is in finding a player that matches the Kraken’s short- and medium-term need. The Kraken are not one player away from a Stanley Cup, and they aren’t one year away from the Stanley Cup either. They need a player who can contribute to a playoff push now and potentially be part of a winning core years down the road. Hypothetically, this could mean targeting a true star player in his late prime years, since even the post-prime years are likely to be useful. More realistically, it means targeting players earlier in their prime window. Botterill told the season ticker holders last week, “We want to continue to add younger players to [the roster] mix in and around Matty [Beniers]’s age.” So, they’re looking for players in the 22-year-old range.
Those assets are rare and difficult to acquire. It is the challenge before them, and it might require an “overpay” to achieve.
Priority No. 2: Retain your restricted free agents
The 2025 offseason depth chart above pencils out as a playable lineup only if the team’s restricted free agents are retained. And I believe there is a solid argument to retain each of them at their market prices. Using Evolving Hockey‘s contract model, here is what it could cost to retain Kakko, Evans, Kartye, Meyers, and Fleury:
There’s a good argument the team should put pen to paper on each of these contracts now if it can. Kakko is 24 years old and only one year from unrestricted free agency. I suspect Kakko’s camp would prefer a shorter deal (getting him to unrestricted free agency sooner) or a much longer one (providing more security), so three years would be something of a compromise. Five years may be the ideal term for Seattle. If the contract were to span five seasons, Evolving Hockey projects a $5,598,000 cap hit. Failing that, the three-year term would be a reasonable outcome, locking in peak years without back-end risk.
Evans may still be an ascending player, but he didn’t show enough in our opinion to commit on a long-term deal at this juncture. A shorter bridge deal that leaves him short of unrestricted free agency at contract’s end—like Evolving Hockey‘s predicted two-year deal would—seems ideal to me. In reality, I suspect it may take $3 million-plus to sign Evans, though.
Each of the other deals are solid for the depth they would provide and could be fully (or almost fully) buried in the AHL if the player is out of the NHL mix. The Kartye contract prediction may be a bit more player-friendly, but the compromise could be a two-year deal in the $1 million average annual value range where the first year has a two-way contract split and the second year is a one-way amount.
Priority No. 3: Find a backup goalie
Seattle’s goalie depth chart looks locked in, but Philipp Grubauer’s struggles may dictate a change. Grubauer’s poor play since signing with Seattle is well chronicled, but it bears emphasis in retrospect. His .890 save percentage over the last four years ranks second-worst of the 53 goalies with at least 100 starts in that span. His -43.13 goals saved above expected and -0.30 goals saved above expected per 60 minutes are both the worst in the league among those 53 goaltenders in the last four years. His tenure with Seattle likely reached a breaking point last season when he was waived and sent to Coachella Valley for a few weeks.
A buyout of the last two years of Grubauer’s contract would save the team $3,916,667 against the cap in 2025-26. That said, the move would be less about saving money—since a quality backup would use much of that space—and more about turning the page in the pursuit of a steady backup for starter Joey Daccord. The intent would be to obtain a player who could provide closer to league average production in the short term while Nikke Kokko and Seattle’s other goaltending prospects continue to develop at other levels.
The window for a buyout opens 48 hours after the Stanley Cup Finals end, but no earlier than June 15, and it closes on June 30 at 5 p.m. ET. So, we will have an answer whether Seattle will be in the goalie market before free agency begins.
Philipp Grubauer (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Priority No. 4: Acquire a top-nine winger
Looking at the team’s depth chart, there is both the need and the room to add another scoring winger or two. Both Andre Burakovsky and Eeli Tolvanen sit in top-nine roles on the current depth chart. Neither are guaranteed to stay there.
Burakovsky has struggled to provide any offensive or defensive value since an injury derailed him midway through the 2022-23 season. He’s a second buyout candidate if cap space becomes necessary for a splash addition. A buyout would create $3,541,667 in cap space for the 2025-26 season.
For his part, Tolvanen could be a piece the team uses in a trade to acquire a frontline player. His production (23 goals last season), contract ($3.475 million cap hit for one season), and age (26) are likely attractive to other clubs. Even if he stays, his skillset (shooting, hitting, and defense) works up and down the lineup. He’d create competitive, upward pressure on those higher in the lineup and valuable injury insurance if he started the season in a “fourth line” role.
Recently, Botterill spoke about the need to add more physicality at the net front: “[B]ringing in players with a little bit more size like a Kakko or a Jani Nyman, I think will certainly help out. [There just needs to be an] emphasis of getting to the net, being stronger in front of the net there from that standpoint.” Ideally, one of the team’s top additions fits that mold. A top-nine winger signing may be the most realistic way to add that presence.
Priority No. 5: Acquire a third-pair defenseman
The Kraken could retain restricted free agent defenseman Fleury, and I believe the organization remains high on Ville Ottavainen, but neither player (nor Ty Nelson) should be penciled into an NHL lineup without veteran competition. Ideally, the Kraken add a player with NHL experience at a low cost who could be serviceable as a No. 6 defenseman alongside Evans if Fleury or Ottavainen can’t seize the role. Pending unrestricted free agent Mahura fits the mold.
Josh Mahura (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Priority No. 6: Sign a fourth-line center
Similarly, the Kraken could retain restricted free agent center Meyers, and the team has already re-signed Hayden. Those players, along with Mitchell Stephens, provide solid depth down the middle. Similar to the depth defenseman need discussed above, a free agent veteran who could win face-offs and play on the penalty kill would improve the mix and ideally win the job.
Priority No.7: Sign a fourth-line winger
The Kraken want to leave open the possibility that a prospect like Jani Nyman (or Berkly Catton, or Ryan Winterton, or Jacob Melanson) seizes a role in the fall. If a prospect forces his way into the lineup, the depth chart could get crowded, but Seattle still may be a forechecking depth winger short. Pending unrestricted free agent Eyssimont is an example of a player who would fit the need.
Bonus: Continue to be opportunistic
Finally, and this likely goes without saying, the Kraken are not talented enough to look past an opportunity for value even if it doesn’t fit the framework above. For example, suppose a finesse winger like Bjorkstrand is available on the cheap or another team wants to overpay to acquire Tolvanen. The Kraken should be in those conversations too.
* * *
What do you think are the team’s offseason areas of need and priorities? Let us know on X @deepseahockey or @sound_hockey or on BlueSky @deepseahockey or @soundofhockey.com.
Curtis Isacke
Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.
While watching the 2025 Stanley Cup Playoffs and trying to figure out what went wrong for the Seattle Kraken, I noticed something curious. Alternate captain Adam Larsson led the team in plus/minus this past season with a plus-22 rating. That’s not shocking—he’s a mainstay on the top defensive pairing.
What did raise an eyebrow, though, was that his long-time partner, Vince Dunn, finished at minus-3. That’s a 25-point swing between players who spent most of their minutes on the ice together. Adding to the mystery, Brandon Montour—a player many viewed as one of the Kraken’s top contributors—finished dead last on the team at minus-22.
Let’s take a look at how plus/minus is calculated and dig into why the gap between Larsson and Dunn exists.
What is plus/minus?
The plus/minus stat is simple on the surface. A player gets a plus-one when their team scores at even strength or shorthanded while they’re on the ice. They get a minus-one when the opposing team scores under the same conditions.
But not all game situations are equal. Here’s how plus/minus is applied across different scenarios:
Even strength: Includes 5-on-5, 4-on-4, and 3-on-3 play. Players receive a plus for scoring goals and a minus when scored against.
Power play: Players do not earn a plus for scoring on the power play but will receive a minus if the opposing team scores shorthanded.
Penalty kill: Players do not get a minus when scored on while killing a penalty. However, they do get a plus if their team scores shorthanded.
Empty net: Surprisingly, empty-net situations count toward plus/minus as long as both teams are at equal strength in terms of total players (goalies and skaters), and no one is serving a penalty. A player earns a plus for scoring and a minus for allowing a goal, even if a goal is scored into an empty net.
Although plus/minus adjusts for manpower on the ice, it does not account for game context—such as whether a team is trailing and has pulled its goalie.
Larsson vs Dunn: How did the gap grow?
Larsson was one of four Kraken players to appear in all 82 games, joining Jared McCann, Matty Beniers, and Jamie Oleksiak. Dunn missed 20 games due to injury, so we focused this analysis on the 62 games both Larsson and Dunn played.
According to MoneyPuck, Larsson and Dunn spent 928 minutes of 5-on-5 ice time together—by far the most-used defensive pairing for the Kraken this season. In comparison, Montour and Oleksiak were paired for 809 minutes over 73 games.
So how did Larsson and Dunn end up with a 25-point difference in plus/minus?
Breaking it down: four key categories
We reviewed shift charts and sorted plus/minus differences into four categories:
Goalie pulled
Special teams
Line changes
Overtime and other
Goalie pulled
The end-of-game, goalie-pulled situation was the biggest factor in creating the disparity between the defensemen. In the below table, “score with extra man” means the team with six skaters on the ice scored.
Larsson, a defense-first player, is trusted to hold leads late in games. He was on the ice for seven Kraken empty-net goals for (plus-7) and only once was scored on in this scenario (Jan. 20 vs. Buffalo), finishing plus-6.
Dunn, a more offensive-minded blueliner, was deployed when the Kraken needed to tie a game. He was on the ice for 13 empty-net goals against (minus-13) but helped the Kraken score three extra-attacker goals—all in a six-day stretch against Vancouver. His net rating in this category was minus-10.
Montour’s minus-22 season was also heavily influenced by pulled-goalie scenarios. He was on the ice for 16 empty-net goals against, including 12 in which he was on the ice at the same time as Dunn. He was involved in three goals for: two extra-attacker goals and one empty-netter, finishing minus-13.
Special teams aftermath
Only shorthanded goals affect plus/minus during power plays or penalty kills. However, we also looked at goals scored immediately after special teams ended, when defensive pairings are often mixed.
Larsson, who plays on the penalty kill, was on the ice for two shorthanded goals for and was also on the ice for seven goals during post-special teams situations—three goals for and four against—resulting in a minus-1. When combined, these situations netted him a plus-1 overall in the special teams category.
Dunn, on the power-play unit, finished minus-5 in this category. He was on for two shorthanded goals against and several goals against during line reconfigurations. This category does not reflect Dunn’s offensive contributions on special teams. He is second all-time in Kraken power-play points with 54—only behind McCann’s 72.
Line changes
In this scenario, goals were scored while Larsson or Dunn were in the process of getting off or on the ice, but the team had not completed a full change. This often occurs due to icing calls—when players are not allowed to change—or when they get stuck in their zone on a long shift.
Larsson was plus-2 in these moments (five goals for, three against while Dunn was off). Dunn was even (five goals for, five against while Larsson was off). This category had a minor impact in terms of net plus/minus, but it still involved 18 total goals scored—far from an insignificant number of events.
Overtime and other
There are limited opportunities to impact plus/minus in overtime, as the Kraken only played 10 overtime games this season, totaling just 36 minutes of OT ice time in games where Larsson and Dunn both played.
Dunn was even, with one goal for and one against—both in overtime. Larsson, who typically does not play much in overtime, was even in OT this season. His lone plus in this category came from a 4-on-4 situation earlier in the year, which is included in the ‘other’ category.
Putting it all together
The chart above shows the 25-point difference in plus/minus. If you strip out empty-net scenarios—which are highly role-dependent—Larsson would finish the season at plus-15, Dunn at plus-10. That paints a more balanced picture of each player’s 5-on-5 performance.
Removing empty-net goals from Montour’s plus/minus improves his rating to minus-7. While still in the negative, that number may reflect the performance of his defensive partners more than his own play. He spent most of the season paired with Oleksiak (minus-2) and Ryker Evans (minus-12), both of whom experienced their own struggles in the defensive zone.
Wrapping up
Plus/minus is not a perfect stat, and this analysis reinforces that. Understanding plus/minus requires context—game situations, deployment, and defensive pairings all play a role. Without that, the stat can give a misleading impression.
Dunn and Larsson—and the Kraken defense as a whole—had an up-and-down season marked by inconsistency. While their performance left room for improvement, there were still strengths to build on. Expect the team’s next head coach to place a strong emphasis on improving the defensive side of the puck.
Blaiz Grubic
Blaiz Grubic is a contributor at Sound Of Hockey. A passionate hockey fan and player for over 30 years, Blaiz grew up in the Pacific Northwest and is an alumni of Washington State University (Go Cougs!). When he’s not playing, watching, or writing about hockey, he enjoys quality time with his wife and daughter or getting out on a golf course for a quick round. Follow @blaizg on BlueSky or X.
When the Seattle Kraken selected WHL phenom Berkly Catton at No. 8 overall in the 2024 NHL Draft, his junior city of Spokane, Wash., erupted with excitement. Fans of their neighbors to the west, the Everett Silvertips, awoke the next morning to learn that their dependable centerman, Julius Miettinen, had also joined the Kraken organization.
As the 2025 NHL Draft approaches—set for June 27–28 in Los Angeles—another Pacific Northwest junior fanbase may get to see one of its local stars stay close to home. Prospects from the Everett Silvertips, Tri-City Americans, and Seattle Thunderbirds project to be selected within the first two rounds.
After some bad luck in the NHL Draft Lottery, the Kraken hold the eighth overall pick once again, but unlike last year—when they chose based on best available talent—organizational need could drive their decision more this time around. And that need appears to be on defense.
To date, all of Seattle’s first-round picks have been forwards. With a clear need on defense, that could finally change. Still, there are enticing offensive talents in the region, any of whom could bolster the Kraken’s long-term attack.
Intriguingly, two of the top defensive prospects expected to be available at No. 8 are junior players who play in the region already. Seattle has heavily favored CHL players in recent drafts, selecting 11 from the OHL and 10 from the WHL. In 2024 alone, they picked four WHL players, including two from the U.S. Division: Catton and Miettinen.
Team scouts were a consistent presence at Silvertips games—especially late in the season while Miettinen was injured—highlighting their close regional monitoring. Selecting regionally is a trend the Kraken have embraced before. So, will they do it again?
Here are some local players that could fit into the team’s long-term plans.
Defense – Jackson Smith – Tri-City Americans
A left-handed offensive threat, Jackson Smith (’07) could be a possible successor to Vince Dunn one day, depending on his development.
At 6-foot-3, 190 pounds, he has the size and skill to be a dynamic two-way defender. That could bode well for Seattle, which needs to bolster the blue-line depth in its prospect pipeline.
With much of the organization’s current D-corps pushing or already past 30 years old, it will soon become time to shift focus to a younger group. Smith’s solid two-way play could make him a well-rounded presence capable of stepping in as the next wave arrives.
Smith finished the season with 11 goals and 43 assists in Tri-City, ranking fourth in team scoring. Sound Of Hockey’s Mid-Season Big Board had Smith ranked eighth—right where the Kraken are set to select.
Left wing – Carter Bear – Everett Silvertips
It’s a shame we didn’t get to see a full draft year from Carter Bear (‘06), because he was electric in the games he did play. He suffered a lacerated Achilles tendon in March, which sidelined him for the remainder of the season.
Bear is a shifty, puck-hounding forward from Winnipeg, MB. His high compete level is what stands out. If he fully commits to the wing, he could be an excellent forechecker alongside the likes of Catton or Shane Wright, helping to set up scoring chances for years to come.
“I think I’ve improved a lot this season,” Bear told Sound Of Hockey after a game in January. “I’ve always been a hard worker on the forecheck and backcheck.”
Despite his shortened season, he continued to climb draft boards. He began the season rated a ‘B’ prospect by NHL Central Scouting, which later was upgraded to an ‘A’.
He’s also a player who knows where to be to contribute offensively. Bear had 82 points in 56 games, leading the Silvertips in scoring during the regular season and was named team MVP, despite the protracted season.
So, Bear could be a real option if the Kraken choose to go the forward route again. Even with the injury, he is still considered a prized top-20 talent, though selecting him at No. 8 could be seen as a reach. There’s growing curiosity about whether his recovery will allow him to participate in the World Junior Summer Showcase in July.
Just two months after partially cutting his Achilles tendon, Carter Bear is not only back on the ice, he's progressing so quickly that it appears likely he'll be ready for the World Junior Summer Showcase in July.
Bear will be sitting very high on our final board at EP.
Seattle Thunderbirds defenseman Radim Mrtka (‘07) is a smooth-skating, big-bodied blueliner from Czechia. He’s also a consensus top-20 prospect in this year’s draft.
Standing 6-foot-6, Mrtka brings shades of John Klingberg, using his reach to compensate for the typical mobility issues that come with his height. Still, he’s agile for his size and skilled with the puck.
He posted 35 points in 43 games for a surging T-Birds team this season and could become a long-term presence on any NHL team’s blue line. He also feels like a natural successor one day to Jamie Oleksiak.
Mrtka ranked 15th on SOH’s Midseason Big Board.
Center – Braeden Cootes – Seattle Thunderbirds
While it’s unlikely the Kraken will select Cootes (‘07) at eighth overall, he remains a fascinating prospect who could still be available at No. 38 when Seattle makes its second-round pick.
The most noticeable part of Cootes’ game is his work ethic. He’s a classic ‘first guy into the zone’ forward who excels at applying pressure and creating chaos in the offensive end.
He also plays smart for his tenacity—just 18 penalty minutes in 60 games this season—and is known for some clutch moments in Seattle.
Cootes led the T-Birds with 26 goals and 37 assists, earning team MVP honors, and also served as their captain—the youngest captain in the entire WHL.
SOH’s midseason board ranked him at 24th, and he just had an outstanding U18 World Championship for Team Canada. So a lot of chips would have to fall the right way for the Kraken to end up selecting him.
So will they do it again?
Given their WHL-heavy draft history and the wealth of local talent in this year’s class, Seattle taking another local product is certainly in play. Whether it’s Jackson Smith or Radim Mrtka shoring up the blue line, or Carter Bear adding bite up front, Seattle has strong regional options that align with both need and philosophy.
With four U.S. Division prospects projected in the top 25, the Kraken could once again turn to familiar territory to shape their future—and fans across the Pacific Northwest will be watching closely.
Header by Brian Liesse, courtesy of the Seattle Thunderbirds
With the first round of the 2025 Stanley Cup Playoffs in the rearview mirror, it’s time for one of my favorite annual traditions: digging into how playoff rosters are constructed and examining the characteristics of the players and teams that are playing for the Stanley Cup.
Player acquisition type
There are several ways to acquire players en route to building a playoff team: drafting and developing, trades, free agency, and even the waiver wire. Let’s take a look at how the 16 teams that made the playoffs this season assembled their rosters.
While the saying goes “build through the draft,” not all playoff teams follow that mantra equally. For example, Colorado, Minnesota, and Vegas relied heavily on trades, while Los Angeles boasts a roster that’s nearly 52 percent homegrown. One of the more interesting items that pops out to me is that the last two Stanley Cup champions, Vegas and Florida, have the lowest percentage of players that they drafted.
It’s also interesting to break down who is scoring goals by acquisition type.
When you take a simplistic approach and look at the average goals scored per game by acquisition type, you can see that players acquired via the draft still produce at a high rate compared to any other acquisition method. In the above chart, the exception is expansion, which is made up of just one player still on the Vegas Golden Knights, William Karlsson. He has three goals in his 10 playoff games so far (0.3 goals per game), which skews expansion into the method of acquisition scoring at the highest rate.
Draft rounds
Draft round distribution offers another lens into how playoff talent is sourced. Unsurprisingly, first-rounders make up a significant chunk of rosters, but value can also be found later.
It’s fascinating to see that 26 percent of Florida’s roster is made up of undrafted players, while only 25 percent of Tampa Bay’s roster consists of first-round draft picks.
Roster age breakdown
Youth and experience both have value in the playoffs. Here’s a look at the average age of each team:
I was surprised to see that the Washington Capitals are the youngest team remaining, while the Edmonton Oilers are the most seasoned. It’s also very interesting to see that the four youngest teams in the Eastern Conference were eliminated in the first round.
Height and weight of playoff rosters
The size of a player isn’t always an important factor in today’s NHL, but it’s still fun to examine the physical profile of each team’s playoff roster. Over the years, we’ve seen this fluctuate across the league, depending on which type of roster has won most recently (i.e., a team built on speed and skill versus a team built on size and physicality).
It’s hard to draw meaningful insights from simply looking at the average height and weight of playoff teams, but it is intriguing that the three tallest teams—Dallas, Vegas, and Washington—are still alive in the playoffs. Meanwhile, the three lightest teams—Colorado, Minnesota, and Montreal—have been eliminated.
The below visual is challenging to read, but it gives you some insight on the distribution of height and weight of the playoff rosters:
Nationalities of players
Another interesting angle to consider is where players were born. Here’s a look at the international makeup of each team’s playoff roster:
As usual, Canadian players have the highest percentage, but there’s plenty of international flavor. Colorado and Toronto have the most American-born players with 39 and 38 percent respectively. Minnesota had the highest percent of Swedish players with 23. Edmonton has the fewest number of American players with two: Trent Frederic and Ty Emberson. Edmonton is also “Canada’s team” with 67 percent of its roster being Canadian.
Cap hit snapshot
Finally, let’s talk some salary cap. The salary cap goes away in the playoffs, but if it were a thing, here’s a look at each team’s playoff roster salary cap, based on average annual values (AAV) of players who have made it into games.
This wraps up our 2025 Stanley Cup Playoffs roster breakdown. If there’s another angle or stat you’d like me to dig into, feel free to drop a note in the comments or shoot me a message.
