Explaining the Brian Dumoulin trade

by | Jul 4, 2024 | 18 comments

On Tuesday, the Seattle Kraken announced the trade of defenseman Brian Dumoulin to the Anaheim Ducks in exchange for Anaheim’s 2026 fourth-round draft pick. Dumoulin, who signed a two-year contract with the Kraken on July 1, 2023, with an annual cap hit of $3.15 million, played 80 games during the 2023-24 season, scoring six goals and adding 10 assists.

Why did Seattle trade Dumoulin? How do we evaluate the move, and what does it mean for Seattle’s offseason plans? Let’s dive in.

Dumoulin played a valuable role for the Kraken

Before discussing team dynamics, it’s important to note Dumoulin’s solid performance for a Kraken team that fell short of expectations last season. Although he faced initial challenges upon joining the Kraken, Dumoulin quickly established himself as a valuable asset.

Just how valuable was he? While Dumoulin achieved a career high in goals (six), his true impact lies beyond the score sheet. As a defensive defenseman, his effectiveness is measured by how well he suppresses opponent opportunities and shifts momentum in Seattle’s favor.

He excelled in this role last year. According to HockeyViz, with Dumoulin on the ice, the Kraken suppressed opponent shot quality by 11 percent above average. Additionally, the team generated 54.5 percent of the overall shot quality during 5-on-5 play with Dumoulin on the ice, per Natural Stat Trick. Among regular lineup players, none achieved a higher expected goals-for percentage. These on-ice results translated into success; Dumoulin ranked third on the team in on-ice plus-minus at +3, while the team as a whole was at -19.

Although primarily deployed as a third-pair defenseman, Dumoulin earned trust from the coaching staff and often stepped up when injuries required it.

Kraken free agent additions dictate a roster move

Why, then, did Seattle trade Dumoulin if he played such a crucial defensive role? The team’s recent signings in free agency necessitated a move to manage its salary cap.

Shortly after free agency opened on July 1, 2024, the Kraken announced a seven-year contract with defenseman Brandon Montour, averaging $7.14 million annually. This brought the number of established NHL defensemen on the roster to seven: Montour, Dumoulin, Vince Dunn, Adam Larsson, Jamie Oleksiak, Will Borgen, and Ryker Evans.

Within hours, center Chandler Stephenson was also signed to a seven-year deal with an average annual value of $6.25 million. These contracts marked the largest total-value signings in Seattle’s or any Ron Francis-managed team’s history.

Assuming Shane Wright and Evans make the team, these signings left the Kraken with approximately $8.25 million in cap space, with 10 forwards and seven defensemen already signed. Qualified restricted free agents Eeli Tolvanen and Matty Beniers, who are yet to sign, will bring the total number of forwards to 12 once their contracts are finalized.

Here are some possible contracts for Tolvanen and Beniers from two prominent contract projections:

Considering Beniers’ decreased point production in the 2023-24 season, most analysts predict a shorter, so-called “bridge” deal. Using the data points above, a reasonable estimate for a bridge deal might be a three-year, $4.6 million AAV contract.

As for Tolvanen, the prevailing wisdom favors a multi-year deal with an expected cap hit in the $3 million to $4 million range. Let’s use a three-year, $4 million AAV contract as a placeholder for Tolvanen.

If Beniers and Tolvanen were added to Seattle’s salary cap table after their spending spree in free agency, the team would already exceed the cap, even without a 13th (or 14th) forward on the roster.

Even a shorter-term deal for Tolvanen, such as a one-year contract at $3.2 million, would leave insufficient room to add a full-time 13th forward. Something had to give.

The team’s decision to trade Dumoulin

Kraken general manager Ron Francis met with the media after the Montour and Stephenson signings on Monday, July 1. When he was asked if the signings would necessitate further moves, Francis said: “[N]ot at this point,” before noting that “[i]t will depend on… talks … with Matty [Beniers] and [Eeli] Tolvanen.” Any subsequent moves will “depend on where those [contracts] come in… But we have looked at a lot of different scenarios and we feel comfortable we will be under the cap and ready to go when the season starts.”

When Sound Of Hockey’s Darren Brown asked Francis what he thought of a crowded seven-player blue line, Francis answered “that’s what training camp is for.” Francis continued: “We carry seven normally all season long. So, we felt comfortable with our six before today, and now we feel really good about our seven.”

We were cautious taking these comments at face value, suspecting that disclosing a tight financial position during negotiations could weaken the team’s bargaining stance.

Lo and behold, less than 24 hours later, Seattle announced Dumoulin’s trade to Anaheim, effectively clearing their defensive logjam and fixing their cap situation. With Dumoulin’s $3.15 million cap hit off the books, the team now had $11.4 million in cap space to accommodate Beniers, Tolvanen, and potentially add a 13th forward and seventh defenseman.

Other potential trade candidates, such as Will Borgen ($2.7 million AAV) or Adam Larsson ($4 million AAV), were less straightforward solutions for Seattle’s roster needs. The team likely values them higher and prefers to either retain or trade them under more favorable circumstances. Alternatively, trading a forward like Brandon Tanev ($3.5 million AAV) without a ready replacement could have simply traded one problem for another by creating a new roster vacancy.

Completing the Kraken roster

The cap picture is much clearer following the Dumoulin trade. Allocating $8.6 million total to Beniers and Tolvanen based on our calculations above, the team could then easily add one depth forward and one depth defenseman on minimum contracts and remain under the cap. Consider the following scenario where John Hayden and Cale Fleury assume those roles:

Alternatively, on July 1, the Kraken signed 25-year-old forward Ben Meyers to a one-year contract at a $775,000 cap hit. Bringing six goals in 67 games of NHL experience, Meyers should compete with Hayden to stick with the team as a 13th forward.

On the blue line, the Kraken signed 26-year-old, left-shot defenseman Josh Mahura to an identical one-year, $775,000 minimum contract on July 3. Mahura has 191 games of NHL experience. He was a full-time, third-pair defender for the Florida Panthers in 2022-23, and continued in that role to begin 2023-24 before a lower-body injury knocked him out of the lineup, and he shifted down the depth chart in favor of other options. Mahura should compete with Fleury for the depth defenseman role.

Evaluating the Dumoulin trade

Given Dumoulin’s strong performance in Seattle and reasonable contract term, some might question why the Kraken didn’t secure a better return in the trade. Recent trade trends indicate that deals around this time of year often prioritize cap management over maximizing player value. The Kraken took advantage of that dynamic when it came to acquiring Oliver Brjorkstrand, but were on the other side of it this time. 

Here are the completed player-for-pick trades just before or during the first 10 days of free agency over the last three years:

  • July 2, 2024: Seattle trades LD Brian Dumoulin to Anaheim for a 2026 fourth-round pick.
  • July 1, 2024: Pittsburgh trades F Reilly Smith (plus salary retention) to New York Rangers for 2025 fifth-round pick and 2027 second-round pick.
  • June 30, 2024: Montreal trades RD Johnathan Kovacevic to New Jersey for a 2026 fourth-round pick.
  • July 2, 2023: Tampa Bay trades F Patrick Maroon (plus 20 percent salary retention) to Minnesota for a 2026 seventh-round pick.
  • July 1, 2023: Dallas trades LD Colin Miller to New Jersey for a 2025 fifth-round pick.
  • July 1, 2023: Montreal trades Joel Edmundson (plus 50 percent salary retention) to Washington for 2024 third- and seventh-round picks.
  • July 22, 2022: Columbus trades F Oliver Bjorkstrand to Seattle for 2023 third- and fourth-round picks.
  •  July 13, 2022: Ottawa trades F Connor Brown to Washington for a 2024 second-round pick.

Kovacevic is the most recent comparable for the Dumoulin deal. Kovacevic is a 26-year-old, 6-foot-5, right-shot defenseman who played 62 NHL games in 2022-23 in a third-pair role, tallying 13 points. He is also cheaper than Dumoulin, with just a $766,667 cap hit for one year. Dumoulin is a better player, no doubt, but it is easy to see how the other factors could even out the value based on the acquiring team’s need. Add in that San Jose’s 2026 fourth-round pick is likely to be a better pick than the one secured for Kovacevic return, and the deals look roughly similar.

The 2023 Joel Edmunson trade may be the closest fit in terms of player profile traded in our sample. The return was slightly better in that case, but I attribute that to Montreal’s $1,750,000 salary retention. Edmunson cost Washington approximately half what Dumoulin will cost against the cap.

The 2023 Colin Miller trade is another comparable deal. Again, Dumoulin is the better player, but Miller was cheaper ($1.85 million AAV for one-year), and he brought a lesser return.

All told, it appears Seattle took a trade in line with what might be expected on the market.

Importantly, Seattle avoided a scenario where they would need to sweeten the deal with prospects or draft picks to move Dumoulin’s contract, similar to Detroit’s experience with Jake Walman, who had two years at $3.4 million average annual value remaining on his deal. Detroit sent a second-round pick to San Jose to facilitate Walman’s trade due to cap constraints.

Revisiting Soucy vs. Dumoulin a year later

All of this made me recall the decision faced by Seattle last offseason whether to re-sign Carson Soucy or sign Brian Dumoulin. Opting for the latter, the team underscored that the shorter term accepted by Dumoulin was important to avoid blocking Ryker Evans. Leap to today, and Evans is ready for the NHL, has a clear path to a role, and the Kraken have a minor draft asset for their troubles.

If the team had instead signed Soucy to the same contract he took in Vancouver, the Kraken would have a player with two years remaining at a $3.25 million annual cap hit. If Soucy had experienced a similarly injury-plagued season in Seattle as he did in Vancouver, moving him may have incurred costs akin to Detroit’s situation with Walman.

Final takeaways

The Dumoulin trade was a necessary step to navigate Seattle’s cap situation while finalizing contracts with restricted free agents Beniers and Tolvanen. Given their current cap space, the deal does not portend additional acquisitions, beyond depth signings, unless the Kraken move out additional existing player contracts in the interim.

Could Seattle have secured a better return for Dumoulin if it had more cap flexibility to hold onto him? Perhaps, but the team prioritized securing targeted players in free agency, placing them in a weaker bargaining position during trade negotiations amidst a depressed summer trade market. In this context, the trade appears fair and aligned with market norms.

* * *

What do you think about the Dumoulin trade and the rest of Seattle’s offseason moves? Do you think the Kraken are done? Do you have anything else you’d like to see the team do? Are the Kraken a better team heading into the 2024-25 season? Let us know in the comments below or X, formerly known as Twitter, @sound_hockey and @deepseahockey.

Curtis Isacke

Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.

18 Comments

  1. Daryl W

    This seems like a very long way of saying, “If you’re moving on to Ryker Evans, why would you pay Dumoulin $3.15m?”
    I appreciate you circling back on Soucy. The folks who blasted moving him were being pretty reactionary. I also value quantifying these moves. Seriously, it seems obvious that you can’t pay a guy $3m+ to “play smoetimes”.

    As far as the rest of the moves – you asked.

    A lot of folks are blasting the Stephenson signing… and without revisiting that move:

    What were/are the alternatives?
    I would add… the Kraken absolutely needed to add a center. Regardless of what the “know-nothings” at the Athletic think, Jared McCann is not a center on this team.

    Reply
    • Boist

      The clear alternative was Wennberg. I know he wasn’t interested in signing an extension when he was on the team, but his tenure in NY went so poorly that he had to settle for a 2 year deal with one of the worst teams in the league. I would’ve been fine with a Stephenson-type 7-year signing in a couple years, since that player’s best production would more coincide with our window. So, It’s not just the signing, it’s the timing of the signing. Montour and Stephenson make this team better, sure, but not cup competitive. This team still lacks high end talent, which will hopefully arrive in a couple years, but by then those two players will likely be declining and way overpaid.

      Reply
      • Daryl W

        So what is this team with Wennberg rather than Stephenson?

        Reply
        • Boist

          Not a serious contender either way is my point.

          Reply
          • Daryl W

            More likely or less likely to make the playoffs?

          • Boist

            More likely next year, and it seems that’s the priority over winning the cup long term. Maybe Stephenson can have a Pavelski-type twilight to his career and Montour can also defy the normal aging curve, and they’ll still be good when our true cup core emerges. I certainly hope that’s the case. I’m just not counting on it.

  2. Paul Whitaker

    Was hoping for a third but as Curtis points out, Detroit had to send SJ a second just to unload Walman who is a younger player. Could have been a lot worse

    Reply
  3. Boist

    Love the trade. They have to give Ryker a shot at regular playing time, and Dumoulin was the clear odd man out. My sense is that they really like Borgen, plus he’s a right shot.

    Next move is obviously trading Tanev. I’d even consider sweetening the deal with a mid round pick to get rid of him so they could hopefully pick up a winger who can score. Perhaps D.D.D. Sprong??

    Reply
    • Curtis Isacke

      We recorded last night and I think you’ll be interested in the dream Darren had…

      Reply
      • Darren Brown

        This sounds so weird, Curtis.

        Reply
    • Rishi S

      I had the same thought, if they have money, why not on Sprong, as they need goals.

      If they don’t sign anyone else for the 13F, not sure why you would suggest Hayden. Would not Winterton, who really came on at the end of the season in CV, be a better choice if goals are the issue?

      Reply
  4. Daryl W

    Getting back to the article… obviously, moving Dumoulin was a good move and I’m kinda surprised they got anything at all. I do still think Nečas is in play maybe.

    The talk is the Canes tried to make a deal with Columbus and that fell through. With the teams still capable of making a trade shrinking and Carolina now looking at having to resign him… how does his arbitration status affect his and the teams position?

    Curtis, since you asked if the Kraken are done and is there anything they should do… can you dive into: what if Nečas goes to arbitration… what would Seattle’s options be in acquiring Nečas (trade, offer sheet, etc..), what other teams – including Carolina – are in a position to sign him?

    While most of the other “fractured” relationships seem to have been patched up (Ehlers, Pinto) this one still seems to be on the table.

    Reply
    • Daryl W

      …and Nečas DID file for arbitration before today’s deadline.

      Reply
  5. It's a fact I'm a quack

    A couple things suck about this trade. Last season, Brian Dumoulin was the team’s best defensive player excepting maybe Vince Dunn, who seriously stepped up his game in that regard. Dumoulin played better defense than Adam Larson and Jamie Oleksiak who both had an uncharacteristically inconsistent season. Unless those two guys bounce back to their normal selves, the blue line could be hurting this coming season. Also, Francis just made the Anaheim Ducks better! The Kraken are going to see Dumoulin in the wrong color sweater four times this coming season, and that awful Ducks defense from before isn’t going to be quite so awful because of this trade. Sweet Christmas, would it ever hurt if the Ducks were to sneak into the playoffs ahead of the Kraken.

    Reply
  6. mpguy

    This is the first of several dominoes to fall because of the overpay in signing Stephenson. The experts’ opinions of the Stephenson trade have pretty much all started with, “What were they thinking when they offered that salary?”.

    Reply
  7. Nonnie Muss

    I’m OK with this trade. Brian Dumoulin great guy, but seemed to me quite mortal on D more han I’d like to see, which with his age makes the trade OK.

    A lot of people talk of trading Turbo, and gosh I hope not. He does so much good with grit, fire, and courage even if he doesn’t score, but more important and obvious, Turbo adds to the PK unit. Honestly, he’s impressed the hell out of me on PK. Plus still skates very strong even at his age. So I see reality but hope the Kraken do NOT move Turbo. He’s also ot one the Kraken want to be proud of trading as it will piss off a shit ton of fans – he’s a fan favorite for good reason.

    Reply
  8. Bevans10

    Given the cost other teams have paid to dump contracts, getting an asset back was a tidy piece of business by Kraken, imo. Respect to Dumo, who exceeded expectations last year. Not paying a 3rd pair D $3M+ is a reasonable way to mitigate overpaying Stephenson. Now, let’s see RFA deals for Matty and Tolvanen that don’t feel like overpays. Praying the first digit of the Tolvy AAV is a 3, not a 4.

    Reply
    • Daryl W

      It’s a 3… but only two years… and he ends UFA at 27.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Sound Of Hockey

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading