Forecasting the Kraken’s 2025–26 Goal Scoring

by | Sep 23, 2025 | 9 comments

Kraken preseason is officially underway. As I have done in previous preseasons, I like to project Seattle’s playoff chances by forecasting the team’s goal scoring. You can review my last three forecasts here: 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25.

This forecast looks at adjusted goals for each player on the projected Kraken roster. The “adjusted goals” metric is defined as goals scored minus empty-net goals. Based on prior analysis, teams with an adjusted goal differential of plus-one to plus-five make the playoffs more than 50 percent of the time. Adjusted goals against is the other half of that equation, but for this article, we’re only focusing on adjusted goals for.

Looking back at the 2024–25 forecast

Last season, the Kraken finished with 230 adjusted goals, an increase of 25 compared to 2023–24. My forecast missed the mark by 11.9 goals. Here’s a player-by-player breakdown:

Overall, the forecast did fine but not great. A few players came in well below expectations, Andre Burakovsky and Jared McCann among them, but Jaden Schwartz more than offset those misses, finishing 10.9 goals above what I had projected for him. That’s how forecasting tends to work: some players overshoot, others undershoot.

There were also factors that would have been tough to build into the model. Jordan Eberle’s injury was significant. Yanni Gourde also missed time with injury, and even when healthy, his production lagged. Trades always shake things up, too. While Gourde and Oliver Bjorkstrand were dealt at the deadline, their lost production was roughly balanced by Kaapo Kakko, who arrived in an earlier trade.

Roster unknowns for 2025–26

Unlike recent offseasons, this year’s roster still has a few question marks. Several rookies are making strong pushes out of camp, and late adjustments could happen depending on who earns spots. That makes projecting games played a little trickier, so I’ve leaned conservative with totals.

Another wrinkle: a lot of Kraken players are entering the final year of their contracts. If Seattle falls out of playoff contention by the deadline, it wouldn’t be surprising to see veterans moved to contenders for future assets. That uncertainty isn’t baked into this forecast, but it’s definitely a storyline to monitor.

Departures and Arrivals for 2025–26

From a pure goal-scoring standpoint, the only notable departure from last season is Bjorkstrand, who was traded to Tampa Bay at the deadline.

The Kraken made two trades this offseason that should help replace some of the goal scoring lost from last year’s roster. First, they acquired Mason Marchment from the cap-strapped Dallas Stars in mid-June. Marchment brings size, physicality, and a proven middle-six scoring touch, with three straight seasons of double-digit goals. Just a week later, the Kraken added Freddy Gaudreau from the Minnesota Wild. Gaudreau isn’t as flashy offensively, but he’s versatile, defensively reliable, and can chip in 10–15 goals while playing anywhere in the lineup (he had 18 last season and 19 in 2022-23). Together, the pair should provide depth scoring and stability that will help offset the loss of Oliver Bjorkstrand.

Based on last year’s production, the Kraken lost 41 goals but brought in 35 — and that’s in 112 fewer games played. That gap is where potential rookies like Berkly Catton, Jani Nyman, and a handful of other candidates could step in and contribute.

Scoring forecast approach

As in past seasons, I’m using each player’s last three years of games played and adjusted goals to project for 2025–26. Games played is the trickiest part to forecast — I leaned on each player’s historical average, but I’ll make the occasional subjective adjustment if I think the production rate doesn’t quite line up.

Yes, some guys have averaged 75-plus games per season, but as we saw with Eberle and Gourde last year, injuries are inevitable. Since it’s nearly impossible to predict who will go down, I also take a conservative approach to projecting games played for the upcoming season.

Forwards forecast

The most difficult part of this forecast is figuring out games played and goals for the rookies. Take Jani Nyman, for example — he scored three goals in 12 games with the Kraken during his late-season call-up and added 28 goals in 58 games for Coachella Valley. He’s a natural goal scorer, so 10 goals in 50 NHL games feels conservative… but that’s probably the right cautious estimate for now, because it’s impossible to say if he’ll be a full-time NHLer.

Berkly Catton is even tougher to predict. He’s either going to play fewer than nine games (because he burns the first year of his entry-level contract if the Kraken keep him for longer than that) or more than 50 — not much in between. I’ve been leaning toward the higher end, but without full certainty, I split the difference and set his forecast at 40 games.

Outside of the rookies, there are a couple of eyebrow-raisers in the model. Shane Wright’s 18.9-goal projection feels a little light, while Jared McCann’s looks a bit heavy. But that’s the nature of an aggregate forecast: some players run hot, some cold, and ideally it all balances out.

Defensemen forecast

Forecasting the defensemen is a bit more straightforward. The top six are pretty well set heading into the season, with Josh Mahura likely sliding into the seventh spot if everyone stays healthy. The one new face, Ryan Lindgren, brings plenty of defensive reliability but isn’t exactly known for his goal scoring.

One player who could push the totals higher is Ryker Evans. He’s shown steady progress the last couple of years, and it wouldn’t be surprising if he chipped in a bit more offense as his role continues to grow.

Putting it together

When you combine the forwards and defensemen, the forecast lands at 246.3 adjusted goals for the 2025–26 season. That’s a 16-goal bump over last year, a total that would’ve ranked ninth in the NHL in 2024–25. It feels a little optimistic, but we’ll stick with it for now.

Other considerations

  • Coaching/system tweaks – The biggest change this offseason came behind the bench with the hiring of Lane Lambert. His teams have been known for playing structured, defensively sound hockey. That could tighten things up in Seattle’s end, but Lambert has also emphasized that creating turnovers in the defensive zone can fuel offense. How that balance plays out will be worth tracking. Lambert mentioned he thought Nyman’s goal in Seattle’s 5-3 preseason win over Vancouver was an excellent example of this. “The thing that excited me about that goal was that it started in the D-zone,” Lambert said. “We killed the play, and then it ended up in the back of their net. So from my perspective, that’s what we’re talking about when we’re talking about defense translating into offense.”
  • Power play – Seattle finished 23rd in the league on the power play last year, leaving plenty of room for improvement. With a new staff and some fresh personnel looks, there’s cautious optimism that the power play could finally take a step forward.
  • Injuries – The ultimate wild card. If the Kraken’s top six can stay mostly healthy, it would go a long way toward hitting (or even exceeding) this forecast.

Will Seattle improve offensively?

My projection for the Kraken’s 2025–26 season comes in at 246.3 adjusted goals, a 16-goal bump from last year. That total would have ranked ninth in the NHL a season ago. Still, the big questions remain: can the young players fighting for roster spots make an impact right away, and how much will Lambert’s system influence scoring, for better or worse?

For now, Kraken fans should keep expectations measured but optimistic. There’s clear upside here, but also plenty of volatility depending on health, development, and where the team sits at the trade deadline. As the season progresses, I’ll layer in adjusted-goals-against numbers to give a full playoff outlook and track how close (or far) this projection ends up.

What do you think, are my numbers too high, too low, or just right? Drop your thoughts in the comments below.

9 Comments

  1. Seattle G

    Maybe I’m in the minority, but I don’t understand the point of these exercises.

    For example, could you forecast who had to play on a line with Burakovsky last season, and deal with a linemate who plays with zero structure and loses pucks anytime an opposing player gets within five feet of him? If you can’t forecast factors like that, you may as well throw everything out the window.

    Maybe this has something to do with betting, which is why I don’t get it.

    Reply
    • John Barr

      The point is to see how goal scoring has changed season over season. The Kraken end last season as a -11 when you exclude the empty net goals for and against. If they end at a zero in goal differential, history says they will make the playoffs 50% of the time. So the point is to see how far or close they are to achieving that differential with the current personnel. The other part of the equation is the goals against which is a lot more challenging to predict, particularly when you change a coaching staff.

      IMHO Trying to forecast things like lines, injuries, and power play time is next to impossible.

      Reply
    • Totemforlife

      You’re not.

      To your example above – a hockey game – more so than any other sport – is a dynamic free flowing sport where players (and there success) is highly interdepent on the actions of others. To think that an individual player’s stats like goals, GAR can be transferred from one team to another fanciful given it’s impossible to replicate the circumstances (linemates?) for a player moving to a new team. This makes for a great conversation starter (which is good) for a broader discussion, but a comparison of goals gained/lost via player transactions isn’t going to make me any more (or less) hopeful for the upcoming season

      Reply
  2. Daryl W

    Too high or too low?

    On August 29th Julian Gaudio did a “prediction” article for the Kraken in The Hockey News. His write-up did not have an adjusted goals projection, but it did have points projections broken out for each player.

    Now…

    If we take the total points projection in the THN article (729) and divide it by the average ratio of points to goals from seasons one thru four (2.686) we come up with 271 goals. To come up with adjusted goals for the projection we take the adjusted goals from last season (230) and divide it by the total goals (247) to come up with .93 (93%).

    THN is a little higher with 252 adjusted goals projected… but 246.3 sounds just about right to me.

    Go Kraken!!!

    Reply
    • John Barr

      That’s the top down (THN) vs bottom-up approach (SOH). Neither is particularly more right or wrong.

      Reply
  3. Chuck Holmes

    The key thing is how well your forecast works. I did not see that you stated it outright but following your links, I tried to come up with the numbers. Correct if wrong. Seems the projections stay within a narrow range.

    2022/23: projected 240; actual 274
    2023/24: projected 256; actual 205
    2024/25: projected 242; actual 230
    2025/26: projected 246; actual ???

    Anyone want to hazard a guess at the missing number?

    Reply
    • John Barr

      I really blew that 23-24 number.

      Reply
      • Boist

        Regression is a B.

        Reply
  4. Smitty

    Out of curiosity I tested ChatGPT to see what they would predict goals. Overall they estimate 250-260 but that includes empty netters, so aligns with the 246. Also tried it for a few specific players based on past performance and performance of comparable players.

    Shane:
    Conservative case: little change in role, modest gains. Perhaps ~0.26 goals/game, about 21-22 goals.
    Base / Expected case: moderate growth, better linemates / more PP time → maybe ~0.30 goals/game → about 24-25 goals.
    Optimistic case: big jump: major role change, near top 6, solid power play usage → ~0.35 goals/game → ~28-30 goals.

    Comparable players & projection logic –
    Players who started similarly: young forwards who in their first “full” NHL season scored in the ~15-25 goal range, with less ice time.
    Improvement trends: assuming modest growth in shooting, ice time, linemates, etc.
    Role and opportunity: if Wright gets more power play time or moves up in lines, goal totals can increase more sharply.
    Given that, some comparable players might be like young 2nd-line centers or wingers who in their first full seasons got 15-25 goals, followed by 20-30 in subsequent seasons assuming growth.

    Matty:
    Conservative: slightly below his 2024-25 rate. Maybe ~0.22 gpg, ~ 18 goals
    Base / Expected: modest improvement, more power play or better linemates, ~0.25-0.28 gpg ~ 20-23 goals
    Optimistic: returning closer to rookie level plus growth ~0.30-0.33 gpg~ 25-27 goals

    Comparables could be young top-6 NHL centers who play decent minutes, get power play time, show both playmaking and some scoring. Some of those players tend to improve in goals as they mature, especially in the 3rd-5th seasons. Given his recent contracts and position on the team, it’s likely the Kraken are investing in him getting more stable opportunities.

    Key factors likely to affect his goal total next season:
    Ice time (5v5 + power play)
    Line mates (if he has strong wingers/assists)
    Shooting volume and shooting percentage
    Injuries / consistency

    Kaapo Kakko: best estimate will land somewhere around ~18-20 goals in the 2025-26 season, likely closer to 20 if he stays healthy, gets those power-play chances, and maintains momentum from his Seattle usage. A strong breakout (25–30 goals) with realistic “big upside” case or ~50–63 points.

    McCann: If McCann remains in a top-six role with consistent power-play time and stays healthy, a goal total of 24–26 goals for the 2025–26 season is a reasonable expectation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Sound Of Hockey

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading