The Seattle Kraken kick off official hockey activities with a two-day rookie camp on Monday and Tuesday, before the full training camp starts Thursday. A lot of the players that will attend the rookie portion are players we saw in the development camp the Kraken hosted in July, but expect higher intensity these next couple days.
A lot of these Seattle Kraken prospects could be years away from making their regular-season NHL debuts, and many will never play for the Kraken. But I always enjoy getting an up-close viewing of Kraken prospects at this point in their careers. Here are four players I am particularly excited about watching.
Carson Rehkopf
Calling out Carson Rehkopf is not exactly going out on a limb. He was the Kraken’s second pick (50th overall) of the most recent NHL Entry Draft, but I feel he could be one of those players we talk about years from now that other teams missed when they had the opportunity to draft him.
I tend to overvalue a prospect’s shooting abilities when compared to his peers, and Rehkopf’s shot really stood out in the group of players at development camp. Another aspect of his game that raised some eyebrows was his poise with the puck. He seemed very patient and often avoided making the obvious pass to instead create an even better scoring opportunity for his team. The sample size was small, and the scenarios were a little different in dev camp, so I hope his performance this week will be consistent with what we saw in July.
2023 fourth-round selection, Andrei Loshko, will not stand out like some prospects in terms of dangles or wicked shots. He is better known for his strong two-way game that could translate to the NHL one day. Originally from Belarus, Loshko has played the last two seasons with the Chicoutimi Sagueneens of the QMJHL, where he put up 70 points over 67 regular-season games in 2022-23. He is considered a bit of a sleeper, so it will be fun to set a baseline at this rookie camp to start tracking his progress over the next few years.
Lukas Dragicevic
I figure that any hardcore Seattle Kraken fan will have plenty of opportunity to see Lukas Dragicevic this season by watching the Tri-City Americans any time they are playing your local US Division WHL team. But it will also be exciting to see how he stacks up against the Kraken prospects. What really fascinates me about Dragicevic is that he switched to defense four seasons ago, explaining his high-end offensive skill. The word around the campfire is that Dragicevic will need to develop his defensive skill, but in the meantime, I will enjoy seeing his offensive prowess on display.
Tucker Robertson
It was not until the OHL playoffs that I watched a lot of Tucker Robertson, and he was a big reason the Peterborough Petes won that league’s championship. The OHL Final was particularly impressive. Robertson had nine points in the series against the London Knights, including one goal and one assist on the Petes’ 2-1 series-clinching victory in Game 6. Robertson might be that elusive right-handed center the Kraken could be looking for. He is expected to be in Coachella Valley this coming season.
If you are not able to attend either of the rookie camp on-ice sessions, a lot of the young players should stick around for at least several days of the main training camp that starts Thursday. The entire schedule can be found here.
With a new crop of prospects from the 2023 NHL Draft, the Seattle Kraken’s farm system is starting to take shape.
The third draft class for Seattle was quite the haul, with 10 picks, four of which were selected in the top 60. Especially with some prospects from Seattle’s debut class graduating from junior hockey to Coachella Valley in the American Hockey League (AHL), the impact of the Kraken scouting staff’s diligence will be felt more now than ever before.
Below is one prospect to watch in the NCAA, Ontario Hockey League (OHL), Quebec Major Junior Hockey League (QMJHL), Western Hockey League, and AHL for this upcoming season.
NCAA – Ben MacDonald (F)
Entering his first season at Harvard, the 19-year-old forward is coming off nearly a point-per-game season with the West Kelowna Warriors, where he scored 50 points in 52 games. The Kraken are clearly high on the Massachusetts native, having traded a pair of fourth-rounders for the privilege of taking MacDonald in the third round of the 2022 NHL Draft.
OHL – Carson Rehkopf (F)
Perhaps an upset pick over Eduard Sale, one of the Kraken’s several second-round picks in the most recent NHL draft is described as a high-energy, high-upside type of prospect. The Kitchener Rangers forward is off to a blistering start in the OHL preseason and could be in for a monster season.
#SeaKraken prospect Carson Rehkopf in OHL preseason action tonight: 3 G, 2 A, 5 PTS, +4, 10 SOG
He now has 5 G, 6 A, 11 PTS, and 27 SOG in 4 GP this preseason.
He’s the choice by default as the lone Kraken prospect in the ‘Q,’ but thankfully for this exercise, Loshko is a pretty interesting prospect. The Belarussian center is entering a new situation after the Chicoutimi Sagueneens dealt him to Rouyn-Noranda. The 6-foot-1 forward finished with 70 points to lead the Sagueneens last season.
WHL – Lukas Dragicevic (D)
An analytical darling in the 2023 draft, Kraken statheads and WHL fans alike were likely thrilled to see Dragicevic in the Kraken system. The 57th overall pick, Dragicevic is a skilled defenseman capable of driving offense and running a power play.
He was already a point-per-game player as an 18-year-old, and the sky’s the limit for the Americans in a seemingly wide-open U.S. Division this upcoming season.
Overseas – Oscar Fisker Mølgaard (F)
His entertaining appearance on the Sound Of Hockey Podcast aside, Fisker Mølgaard is set to play for HV71 in the Swedish Hockey League again after putting up four goals and three assists in 41 games last season. Noted as a detail-oriented center, we’re curious how his offensive game ticks up in his 19-year-old season.
AHL – Ryan Winterton
A significant shoulder injury limited Ryan Winterton the past two seasons, but when healthy, the 20-year-old forward was a dynamic force, especially in last season’s playoffs in the OHL with the London Knights. There, he posted 29 points in 21 games – including a 12-game point streak.
With two consecutive OHL finals appearances, including a Memorial Cup bid with Hamilton, under his belt, Winterton has little to prove in junior hockey. We’re excited to see how he fits in Coachella Valley alongside prospects like Tucker Robertson and Kyle Jackson.
Josh Horton
Josh Horton is a freelance writer, former newspaper journalist, and erstwhile Western Hockey League writer for the Everett Herald and The Spokesman-Review (Spokane). He is NOT a juggler, nor is he a former professional baseball player. Follow him on Twitter @byjoshhorton.
You’ve heard of a top-100 prospects list. But who needs those? At Sound Of Hockey we set out on a much more reckless endeavor: Let’s rank every skater prospect (both drafted and signed players) that meet two criteria entering the 2023-24 season: (1) younger than 25 years old, and (2) fewer than 50 NHL games played.
While we likely missed a few along the way, our research turned up 1027 skaters meeting these criteria–and we ranked them all. Our ranking is built on Thibaud Chatel’s NHL equivalency research and uses only quantifiable measures: prospect points per game, strength of the player’s current league, prospect age, and prospect height, with a minor adjustment for positional value.
The approach we used was similar to our approach in making a data-based ranking of 2023 NHL Draft and 2024 NHL Draft prospects. If you want the full gory details on method, check out this post describing the process from earlier this offseason.
For current purposes, it is likely sufficient to reiterate that this is a true “data-only” ranking with no adjustments for subjective preferences or the “eye test.” For example, Connor Bedard would be my No. 1 prospect if I were assembling a personal list, but the NHL equivalency-based approach I used here puts him fourth.
This “data-only” exercise is meant to compliment traditional scouting assessments. Are there players that the scouting lists have overlooked? If so, we can dig in and try to figure out if the player is simply under-appreciated or if there is a flaw in the player’s game that could hold the player back. The data is helpful in honing in on these outlier cases that may be worthy of a second look (for good or bad).
Without further ado, you can find the full ranking, with a lot of data on each prospect HERE.
Important note on using the NHL affiliate prospect ranking: If you want to filter the data by various categories, highlight row 3, then select “Data,” “Filter Views,” and “Create New Temporary Filter View.” This will allow you to manipulate the data in a way visible only to you.
Which prospects have the most impressive data profiles?
Based on prospect scoring, strength of league, age, height, and position only, here is your “data-only” top-100 prospects.
Prospect Ranking
Full Name
Team
Position
Height (ft in)
Age
Draft Year
Draft Pick
Chatel NHLe (unadjusted)
1
Adam Fantilli
CBJ
C
6′ 2″
18
2023
3
38.59
2
Alexander Nikishin
CAR
D
6′ 3″
22
2020
69
45.41
3
Matvei Michkov
PHI
RW
5′ 10″
18
2023
7
39.01
4
Connor Bedard
CHI
C
5′ 10″
18
2023
1
35.55
5
David Jiricek
CBJ
D
6′ 4″
19
2022
6
29.99
6
Brandt Clarke
LAK
D
6′ 2″
20
2021
8
33.58
7
Joakim Kemell
NSH
RW
5′ 11″
19
2022
17
35.64
8
Jiri Kulich
BUF
C
5′ 11″
19
2022
28
33.46
9
Logan Cooley
ARI
C
5′ 10″
19
2022
3
32.83
10
Kaiden Guhle
MON
D
6′ 2″
21
2020
16
33.55
11
Luke Hughes
NJD
D
6′ 2″
20
2021
4
26.22
12
Leo Carlsson
ANA
C/RW
6′ 3″
18
2023
2
26.57
13
Lukas Reichel
CHI
LW/RW
6′ 0″
21
2020
17
37.81
14
Lane Hutson
MON
D
5′ 9″
19
2022
62
26.22
15
Jakob Pelletier
CGY
LW/C
5′ 9″
22
2019
26
46.50
16
Quentin Musty
SJS
LW
6′ 2″
18
2023
26
24.80
17
William Smith
SJS
C
6′ 0″
18
2023
4
26.08
18
Luke Evangelista
NSH
RW
6′ 0″
21
2020
42
37.38
19
Marco Rossi
MIN
C
5′ 9″
22
2020
9
41.72
20
Gabriel Perreault
NYR
RW
5′ 11″
18
2023
23
25.83
21
Marat Khusnutdinov
MIN
C/LW
5′ 11″
21
2020
37
35.51
22
Simon Nemec
NJD
D
6′ 1″
19
2022
2
23.47
23
Jimmy Snuggerud
STL
RW
6′ 1″
19
2022
23
26.65
24
Ryker Evans
SEA
D
5′ 11″
21
2021
35
31.29
25
Roby Jarventie
OTT
LW
6′ 2″
21
2020
33
32.60
26
William Eklund
SJS
C/LW
5′ 11″
20
2021
7
33.03
27
Nikita Grebyonkin
TOR
LW/RW
6′ 2″
20
2022
135
29.11
28
David Reinbacher
MON
D
6′ 2″
18
2023
5
20.49
29
Juuso Parssinen
NSH
C/LW
6′ 3″
22
2019
210
39.11
30
Jeremie Poirier
CGY
D
6′ 1″
21
2020
72
27.38
31
Jean-Luc Foudy
COL
C
5′ 11″
21
2020
75
33.90
32
Alexander Holtz
NJD
RW
6′ 0″
21
2020
7
34.77
33
Ridly Greig
OTT
C/LW
6′ 0″
21
2020
28
32.16
34
Nikolai Kovalenko
COL
RW/LW
5′ 10″
23
2018
171
53.56
35
Jordan Spence
LAK
D
5′ 10″
22
2019
95
34.33
36
Simon Edvinsson
DET
D
6′ 6″
20
2021
6
22.60
37
Ville Heinola
WPG
D
6′ 1″
22
2019
20
31.73
38
Justin Barron
MON
D
6′ 2″
21
2020
25
27.81
39
Graeme Clarke
NJD
RW
6′ 0″
22
2019
80
37.38
40
Jordan Dumais
CBJ
RW
5′ 8″
19
2022
96
26.76
41
Tyson Foerster
PHI
RW
6′ 2″
21
2020
23
32.16
42
Cutter Gauthier
PHI
LW/C
6′ 2″
19
2022
5
24.73
43
Nikita Alexandrov
STL
C
6′ 1″
23
2019
62
40.42
44
Fabian Lysell
BOS
RW
5′ 11″
20
2021
21
29.12
45
Matthew Poitras
BOS
C
5′ 11″
19
2022
54
25.14
46
Colby Barlow
WPG
LW
6′ 0″
18
2023
18
22.39
47
Andrew Cristall
WSH
LW
5′ 10″
18
2023
40
23.14
48
Matthew Wood
NSH
LW/C
6′ 5″
18
2023
15
20.68
49
Sasha Pastujov
ANA
RW/LW
6′ 0″
20
2021
66
26.52
50
Pavel Mintyukov
ANA
D
6′ 1″
19
2022
10
20.84
51
Bogdan Konyushkov
MON
D
5′ 11″
20
2023
110
23.87
52
Connor Zary
CGY
C
6′ 0″
22
2020
24
33.46
53
Daniil Pylenkov
TBL
D
6′ 1″
23
2021
196
32.02
54
William Dufour
NYI
RW
6′ 2″
21
2020
152
30.42
55
David Goyette
SEA
C
5′ 10″
19
2022
61
24.62
56
Olen Zellweger
ANA
D
5′ 9″
20
2021
34
22.03
57
Dalibor Dvorsky
STL
C/RW
6′ 1″
18
2023
10
20.47
58
Niko Huuhtanen
TBL
RW
6′ 2″
20
2021
224
24.80
59
Vasili Ponomaryov
CAR
C
5′ 10″
21
2020
53
31.29
60
Shane Wright
SEA
C
6′ 0″
19
2022
4
24.00
61
Sean Farrell
MON
C/LW
5′ 9″
21
2020
124
33.26
62
Matthew Maggio
NYI
RW
5′ 11″
20
2022
142
27.72
63
Logan Stankoven
DAL
C/RW
5′ 7″
20
2021
47
28.58
64
Logan Morrison
SEA
C
6′ 0″
21
N/A
N/A
28.24
65
Zach Benson
BUF
LW
5′ 9″
18
2023
13
21.33
66
Ty Nelson
SEA
D
5′ 9″
19
2022
68
19.98
67
Shakir Mukhamadullin
SJS
D
6′ 4″
21
2020
20
23.59
68
Francesco Pinelli
LAK
C
6′ 0″
20
2021
42
25.31
69
William Wallinder
DET
D
6′ 4″
21
2020
32
21.70
70
Aatu Jamsen
LAK
RW/LW
6′ 1″
21
2020
190
27.16
71
Amadeus Lombardi
DET
C
5′ 10″
20
2022
113
25.31
72
Evan Vierling
PIT
C
6′ 0″
21
2020
127
27.72
73
Ty Voit
TOR
W/C
5′ 10″
20
2021
153
25.14
74
Samuel Bolduc
NYI
D
6′ 4″
22
2019
57
27.38
75
Ryan Leonard
WSH
C
6′ 0″
18
2023
8
20.30
76
Yegor Sokolov
OTT
LW/RW
6′ 3″
23
2020
61
36.51
77
Juraj Slafkovsky
MON
LW
6′ 3″
19
2022
1
21.03
78
Lukas Cormier
VGK
D
5′ 10″
21
2020
68
24.34
79
Gage Goncalves
TBL
C
6′ 0″
22
2020
62
33.90
80
Vladislav Firstov
MIN
LW
6′ 1″
22
2019
42
30.86
81
Joshua Roy
MON
W/C
6′ 0″
20
2021
150
23.35
82
Arseni Gritsyuk
NJD
RW/LW
5′ 11″
22
2019
129
33.19
83
Topi Niemela
TOR
D
5′ 11″
21
2020
64
23.47
84
Will Cuylle
NYR
LW
6′ 3″
21
2020
60
26.95
85
Trey Fix-Wolansky
CBJ
RW
5′ 7″
24
2018
204
50.41
86
Elliot Desnoyers
PHI
LW
5′ 11″
21
2020
135
28.68
87
Cruz Lucius
CAR
RW
6′ 0″
19
2022
124
21.32
88
Rutger McGroarty
WPG
C/LW
6′ 0″
19
2022
14
21.32
89
Michael Buchinger
STL
D
5′ 11″
19
2022
88
17.91
90
Nolan Burke
NSH
C
6′ 3″
20
N/A
N/A
23.76
91
Matvei Petrov
EDM
RW/LW
6′ 2″
20
2021
180
23.25
92
Isak Rosen
BUF
W/C
5′ 11″
20
2021
14
24.34
93
Adam Engstrom
MON
D
6′ 2″
19
2022
92
17.71
94
Semyon Chistyakov
NSH
D
5′ 10″
22
2019
117
25.62
95
Maxim Beryozkin
EDM
RW/LW
6′ 2″
21
2020
138
27.95
96
Jan Jenik
ARI
RW/C
6′ 1″
23
2018
65
33.90
97
Declan Chisholm
WPG
D
6′ 2″
23
2018
150
31.73
98
Rodwin Dionicio
ANA
D
6′ 2″
19
2023
129
16.88
99
Stanislav Svozil
CBJ
D
6′ 0″
20
2021
69
20.07
100
Sam Lipkin
ARI
LW/C
6′ 2″
20
2021
223
23.45
Digging into this data on the top-100 prospects a bit, I looked at just how much a player needs to score to be considered among this top tier of future NHL players. Depending on age and position, a major junior player needs to be scoring between one and two points per game to reach this upper echelon prospect status. An AHL or top European pro league player needs to produce between .4 and 1 points per game, while a KHL player can check in on the lower end of that range and still rank highly.
On the demographics side, Canada still leads the way in the hockey world, with 41 of the top 100 prospects hailing from the Great White North.
Of the top 100, 60 percent were first- or second-round draft picks. This underscores that NHL teams are efficient in identifying amateurs most likely to turn into productive professionals. It also supports the work of other draft analysts indicating that first- and second-round draft picks are by far the most valuable in generating future NHLers.
Of the top-100 prospects, only one was not drafted (reflected by the “null” in the chart above). Any guesses on who that might be? Keep reading for the answer.
Finally, let’s take an initial look at how these top-100 prospects are distributed across the NHL.
How do Seattle’s prospects stack up?
Since this website primarily covers the Seattle Kraken, many may be wondering where Seattle’s prospects stack up. The answer is: Quite well. Of course, the Kraken value data in their amateur scouting process, so this is not terribly surprising. Still, it is a notable success that Seattle has one of the deepest prospect pools of high-scoring, young talent despite participating in only three drafts (and having only three first-round picks to date). Two undrafted free agent signings stand out as important future pieces as well.
Prospect Ranking
Full Name
Team
Position
Height (ft in)
Age
Country
Draft Year
Draft Pick
Chatel NHLe (unadjusted)
24
Ryker Evans
SEA
D
5′ 11″
21
CAN
2021
35
31.29
55
David Goyette
SEA
C/LW
5′ 10″
19
CAN
2022
61
24.62
60
Shane Wright
SEA
C
6′ 0″
19
CAN
2022
4
24.00
64
Logan Morrison
SEA
C
6′ 0″
21
CAN
N/A
N/A
28.24
66
Ty Nelson
SEA
D
5′ 9″
19
CAN
2022
68
19.98
101
Tye Kartye
SEA
C/LW
5′ 11″
22
CAN
N/A
N/A
31.29
118
Lukas Dragicevic
SEA
D
6′ 1″
18
CAN
2023
57
14.92
137
Ryan Winterton
SEA
C/RW
6′ 2″
20
CAN
2021
67
20.32
141
Jagger Firkus
SEA
RW
5′ 10″
19
CAN
2022
35
19.93
155
Tucker Robertson
SEA
C
5′ 11″
20
CAN
2022
123
21.18
192
Jani Nyman
SEA
RW
6′ 2″
19
FIN
2022
49
16.92
194
Jacob Melanson
SEA
RW
5′ 11″
20
CAN
2021
131
20.47
214
Kyle Jackson
SEA
LW/C
6′ 2″
20
CAN
2022
196
19.98
242
Kole Lind
SEA
RW
6′ 1″
24
CAN
2017
33
41.29
253
Carson Rehkopf
SEA
C/LW
6′ 2″
18
CAN
2023
50
14.46
366
Andrei Loshko
SEA
C/RW
6′ 1″
19
BLR
2023
116
12.99
425
Eduard Sale
SEA
C/RW
6′ 2″
18
CZE
2023
20
11.41
445
Marian Studenic
SEA
LW/RW
6′ 1″
24
SVK
2017
143
31.29
452
Ville Ottavainen
SEA
D
6′ 5″
21
FIN
2021
99
11.81
498
Caden Price
SEA
D
6′ 1″
18
CAN
2023
84
8.50
504
Tyson Jugnauth
SEA
D
5′ 11″
19
CAN
2022
100
10.02
518
Barrett Hall
SEA
C
6′ 1″
19
USA
2022
164
11.81
529
Zaccharya Wisdom
SEA
RW
6′ 0″
19
CAN
2023
212
11.37
619
Oscar Fisker Molgaard
SEA
C
6′ 0″
18
DNK
2023
52
8.84
670
Ville Petman
SEA
C/LW
5′ 10″
23
FIN
N/A
N/A
17.38
712
Zeb Forsfjall
SEA
C
5′ 9″
18
SWE
2023
180
5.65
748
Ben MacDonald
SEA
C
5′ 11″
19
USA
2022
91
8.12
777
Justin Janicke
SEA
LW/C
5′ 11″
20
USA
2021
195
8.31
828
Kaden Hammell
SEA
D
6′ 1″
18
CAN
2023
148
5.02
871
Luke Henman
SEA
C
6′ 0″
23
CAN
2018
96
10.87
888
Peetro Seppala
SEA
D
6’2″
23
FIN
N/A
N/A
7.39
By this point you have likely noticed the answer to our little trivia question–Seattle Kraken prospect Logan Morrison is the one undrafted prospect in the top-100. Who is the second-highest ranked undrafted prospect? Seattle Kraken F Tye Kartye, who checks in just outside the top-100 at No. 101 overall.
Next up: Ranking the prospect pools
How does the Kraken prospect pool stack up against the rest of the league? I’ll dig into that question a little further next time. In the meantime, here, again, is the link to the full ranking of NHL affiliated prospects.
Curtis Isacke
Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.
From July 29 through Aug. 4, some of the best under-20 players from the United States, Finland, and Sweden met at the home of the U.S. National Team Development Program in Plymouth, Mich. Each team has the same goal: Winning the 2024 World Junior Championship starting in December. This summer exhibition–dubbed the World Junior Summer Showcase–is all about evaluation. Which players should be on the World Juniors rosters?
Four players drafted by the Seattle Kraken saw playing time at the event: Finns Jani Nyman (No. 49 overall in the 2022 draft), Niklas Kokko (No. 58/2022), and Visa Vedenpaa (No. 168/2023), and Swede Zeb Forsfjall (No. 180/2023). I was able to watch all of Team Finland’s games and two of Team Sweden’s games. How did the players look? Are they likely to make the World Juniors rosters for their respective nations?
Since it’s a slow month on the hockey calendar, and this is a good excuse to check in on a few prospects, let’s dive in with Kraken-related takeaways and videos from the World Junior Summer Showcase.
Jani Nyman, LW, Finland
Showcase statistics. Nyman had two goals, zero assists, and three minor penalties (roughing x2, tripping) in four games played.
Tape analysis. Nyman played the left wing in a top-six role for the entire tournament. He did not play on the penalty kill, but he was a fixture on the first power-play unit. He served as one of the two trailing forwards on the man advantage–one of the players who attempts a controlled-carry zone entry to set up the unit in the offensive zone. (The Kraken used Andre Burakovsky, Jordan Eberle, and Alex Wennberg, among others, in a similar role in 2022-23.) Once established in the zone, he was most commonly on the right side half wall, looking to unleash one-timers from the right-wing circle. He scored on one such opportunity.
He looks like he has “it” when it comes to this kind of shot. By no means do I mean to suggest he’s going to score like Alex Ovechkin or David Pastrnak on the man advantage, but could he get close to Daniel Sprong’s production with his shot someday? Some players drill this shot constantly and never quite find it consistently enough. Nyman doesn’t have this problem. If given the opportunity in the NHL, I’d project him to rack up five-plus goals each season on that shot alone.
The rest of Nyman’s game is an incredibly challenging evaluation, I think. He has a number of strong discrete skills. He can shoot and pass at an NHL level. He can use his body to protect the puck and his strength to win board battles. He uses a physical style to drive play toward the opponent’s net regularly. And he plays with some edge, frequently entering the fray to stand up for a teammate.
But I also saw a player who struggled to stitch together his skills into cohesive, high-end play. He is a slower, hunched skater. He struggled to get the puck through the neutral zone with control at five-on-five because he can’t get much separation from the defense. He won’t win many chase situations and, worse, he often seemed to give up on plays where a foot race became necessary. On the defensive end, his feet deadened too often, and he was left to reach on a poke check. This led to a preventable tripping penalty in one game. Off the puck, he offered very little engagement defensively.
So, I oscillated between thinking “this is one of the most exciting prospects Seattle has” and doubts that he just won’t be able to succeed at a higher level where skilled players can exploit his flaws. I also started wondering whether there is some kind of sheltered bottom-line-and-power-play role that could get his shot onto NHL ice even if the other aspects of his game don’t progress, but I was left a bit pessimistic about that concept.
All of that said, Nyman is still young. He just turned 19 on July 30. He has plenty more development yet to come. And the “highs” are quite high for Nyman already. Indeed, good friend of the Sound of Hockey Podcast, Chris Peters, had Nyman as a player that stood out positively at the Showcase. I’ll be watching Nyman’s season closely.
World Juniors verdict. Nyman will be a top-six (likely top-line) left wing for Finland at the World Junior Championships.
Zeb Forsfjall, C, Sweden
Showcase statistics. Forsfjall had one goal, zero assists, and one minor penalty (cross-checking) in four games played.
Tape analysis. Team Sweden used Forsfjall as its bottom-line pivot and on the penalty kill. Through the two games I watched, I found it very easy to love this player. Forsfjall has easy, joystick-style mobility on the ice. He can get to anywhere the play dictates. His straight-line speed is also very good, even if a step down from elite. Finally, he displays strong puck-possession skill through the neutral zone.
Beyond that, his skills aren’t “loud,” but he gets results. He deploys a high-energy and engaged play style, particularly in the defensive zone. He has good instincts on the penalty kill and uses his speed to pressure opponents at the correct times.
As an undersized center, Forsfjall has a bit of Yanni Gourde in his game. But he’ll need to add some bulk if he’s going to play a hard-charging, forechecking style like No. 37 in deep sea blue. Forsjfall was willing but not always effective at winning puck battles at the World Junior Summer Showcase.
On the offensive side, Forsfjall showed enough passing and shooting skill to score opportunistically.
The question on Forsfjall is two-fold: Can he add strength, and can he continue to develop his offensive game? With modest gains in each area, it’s not difficult to imagine him finding a job as an NHL role player down the line. If this is the outcome, it’s outstanding value from a sixth-round draft pick.
World Juniors verdict. I highly doubt Forsfjall will be on Team Sweden this year, but if he can get a little stronger over the next year, I could imagine him securing a bottom-line, energy role for Sweden in 2025. You can’t say that about too many players drafted 180th overall in the NHL Draft.
Niklas Kokko, G, Finland
Showcase statistics. Kokko allowed 8 goals on 87 shots on goal, for a .908 save percentage. He won two games and dropped one.
Tape analysis. Kokko played three of the four games in this exhibition tune-up and looked calm and collected doing it. He used his big frame well, anticipated plays, and flashed a quick glove to deny a couple clean breakaway looks.
From my vantage, he looked like Finland’s second-best player across these four games. Cam Robinson of Elite Prospects was similarly complimentary of Kokko’s performance. As of this check in, Kokko’s development seems to be “on track” for an aggressive move to the AHL in the 2024-25 season as a 20-year-old.
World Juniors verdict. Kokko appears firmly entrenched as the projected starter for Team Finland at the 2024 World Juniors. Performance this fall will be a factor, but absent a collapse from Kokko, the job should be his, with Topias Leinonen his backup.
Visa Vedenpaa, G, Finland
Showcase statistics. Vedenpaa allowed 4 goals on 24 shots on goal, for a .833 save percentage. He was the losing goalie in his only start.
Tape analysis. Vedenpaa faced a number of tough looks in his one start, but he held up his end of the bargain for the most part. He’s trained in the same style as Kokko, but noticeably a bit smaller in the net. Vedenpaa found himself out of position at times, but he was often able to save himself with skilled and athletic plays.
World Juniors verdict. Vedenpaa won’t be in net for Finland this year, but his presence with the national team suggests he is in the running for the job in 2025. If he is one of the team’s final cuts or accompanies the team as an extra player who never suits up at this year’s World Junior Championship–as Kokko did last year–it will be a strong endorsement of his future outlook.
Other takeaways from the Showcase
Admittedly, I was watching Team Finland closer than the other squads, but the only player that I thought beat out Kokko in this exhibition was Finnish forward Lenni Hämeenaho.
New Jersey picked the native of Kajaani, Finland, at No. 58 in the 2023 NHL Draft–just after Seattle’s run of three second-round picks. Hämeenaho had played his entire draft season in Finland’s top professional league, Liiga, and performed incredibly well for his age, tallying 25 points in 59 total games. In my adjusted “NHL equivalency” calculation, his data netted out in the late-first-round range. Combined with scouting reports endorsing him as a second-round option (he ranked No. 56 on the Big Board), I thought a number of factors lined up to make him a strong option for Seattle with one of their second-round picks. Seattle didn’t go that way.
At the World Junior Summer Showcase, Hämeenaho showed off a diverse skillset as a top-six winger. He can skate, pass, shoot, possess the puck, forecheck, and backcheck, all from a frame that appears almost NHL-ready. He was often the best player on the ice, even though he was surrounded by players drafted higher. The knock on him before the draft was that he may have a low ceiling. And that may be. None of his skills looked “elite” to me. He’s probably a middle-six winger in the best case. But at this exhibition he was able to link up a number of strong skills and deliver a very impressive performance. He’ll be a player I watch and wonder about from a Kraken perspective.
Beyond Hämeenaho, two players that stood out to me were the 2024 draft-eligible Finnish center Konsta Helenius and the 2025 (!) draft-eligible U.S. center James Hagens.
Helenius is a bit undersized and struggled on the faceoff dot at times, but he brought an impressive defensive game and showed signs of offense too despite playing against players a year or more older than him. He was one of Finland’s better players up front and could be a top-15 pick next summer.
Hagens, who is just 16 years old, did not look out of place despite playing two-plus years up. He played a lower-leverage role, but showed flashes of pretty much every trait you could want in a player. If the 2025 NHL Draft is destined to be the “Michael Misa” year, Hagens could be in the conversation with any player after that.
Curtis Isacke
Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.
Lukas Dragicevic, selected No. 57 overall by the Seattle Kraken, is a 6-foot-1, right-handed offense-first defenseman who plays in Washington State already, with the Tri-City Americans in the WHL.
Instant reaction
This pick made so much sense. A perfect combination of need (right-handed defense, transition play, power-play production, and offense from the blue line) with value in the late second round (Dragicevic was ranked as a mid-first-round pick in our data and analytics ranking).
It was well documented going into the draft that the Kraken were lacking in depth on the right side of their blue line. The team had invested just one pick in each of their first two drafts on the position and neither player has top-of-the-lineup ceiling. 2022 third-round pick Ty Nelson has shown scoring touch at the junior level, but some questions about his projection to the NHL persist due to his style of offensive play and 5-foot-10 frame. 2021 fourth-round pick Ville Ottavainen is a towering defense-first blueliner who has not done much in the way of scoring during his time in the top Finnish league, Liiga, but is scheduled to join the Coachella Valley Firebirds this season.
Enter Lukas Dragicevic. Dragicevic has been on my radar for months because his scoring profile befitted a first-round pick. Setting aside U.S. and Canadian high school players, no right-handed defenseman eligible for the draft for the first time this season scored more in total points (79) or on a per-game basis (1.07 points per game). Among all defensemen, only QMJHL lefty Etienne Morin scored at a slightly higher rate, and, when accounting for the relative strength of those two major junior leagues, there is an argument to be made Dragicevic’s production was more impressive.
In other words, to quote to the Elite Prospects Draft Guide: “Lukas Dragicevic is the best offensive defenseman in this year’s draft.” My NHLe calculation, which primarily relied on point production and incorporated only minor adjustments for age and height, pegged Dragicevic as the eighth-best player in the entire draft. And the consensus in the analytics community was not far behind, placing the Tri-City blueliner as the 19th overall prospect.
Before the draft, I was tempted to project Dragicevic as a first-round fit for the Kraken but resisted due to the potential high-end value of first-round forwards. As I explained then: “My hesitation on targeting Dragicevic (or Gulyayev) in the first round relates back to positional value. High-end forwards are hard to find and typically deliver the most value in the game. Setting aside a few truly transcendent players, a team is capping its upside by drafting on defense in the first round. Add in the significant probability that Dragicevic settles in as a bottom-four guy and a bit of a defensive liability, and I can see the arguments against using a first-round pick on the player.”
As a team with a heavy focus on these types of analytics, it would not be surprising if the Kraken have reached a similar conclusion. Seattle snagged three forwards at 20, 50, and 52. Then, with Dragicevic still available at 57, it was a no-brainer. He was a perfect fit for the Kraken at No. 57 and brings the high ceiling the Kraken have lacked amongst their right-handed defensemen.
Lukas Dragicevic, the #2023NHLDraft's top offensive blue-liner, led Tri-City in:
Dragicevic was ranked at No. 33 on the Sound Of Hockey Big Board. Dragicevic’s highest ranking was from McKeen’s, which placed him at No. 20 overall. Bob McKenzie, often a good indicator of sentiment inside the league, had him ranked at No. 35 overall. Dragicevic being available at No. 57 was likely a surprise to Seattle and a welcome one.
Strengths: “Dragicevic possesses elusive footwork and slick hands, which he can use in tandem to dance around and embarrass anyone who tries to recklessly pressure him. He has an absolute bomb of a slap shot that he loves to uncork and lean in to, but he also has a hard, accurate wrist shot that he can use to try beating a goalie clean or send in for a deflection. As good as he is on the attacking line, he’s also not shy about getting closer to the net to generate offense, whether that’s by driving the puck himself deep along the wall or into in high danger, or by moving forward with a burst of quickness to get open for a bang-bang play or trying to sneak in undetected. Unsurprisingly, he’s a monster on the power play and has what it takes to quarterback a top unit in the NHL one day. He’s also a major factor at driving the play up the ice and into the offensive zone, keeping his head up and controlling the puck at full flight as he weaves through traffic.” – McKeen’s Draft Guide
Weaknesses: “Dragicevic’s game has some real warts, highlighted most notably by, as one scout aptly describe to me, ‘clunky feet.’ He gives too much in his gaps, likely to compensate for his footwork and also his processing speed (he’s just doesn’t pick up on when to close gaps in real time fast enough). He lacks foot speed going in straight lines forwards and backwards, where his stride can look rushed and heavy, and his pivots are a real issue.” – Scott Wheeler of The Athletic
Where can I find more information?
Corey Pronman of The Athletic (link) ($$) ranked Dragicevic No. 31 overall
Scott Wheeler of The Athletic (link) ($$) ranked Dragicevic No. 36 overall
Chris Peters of FloHockey (link) ranked Dragicevic No. 34 overall
Following a theme of this draft, Dragicevic is not without risk in his profile – he’s relatively new to his position, struggled with rush defense, and wasn’t particularly effective as an in-zone defender either. As Mckeen’s notes: “The sheer range of possibility for how his career goes is immense from one end to the other. It’s entirely possible that he ends up as one of the 10 best players to come from this class, yet at the same time, it also wouldn’t be particularly surprising if his development went sideways, and he never ended up sniffing the NHL.”
Dragicevic needs to develop significantly on the defensive side and at least some scouts suggest he needs to clean up aspects of his skating. How that goes will determine his future. If the arrow points up in those areas, first-pair potential is not out of the question, particularly if matched with a stronger defensive partner. With moderate progress, he’s a bottom-four type. With little or no progress, he may never become an NHL regular. Still, he’s a terrific bet at pick No. 57 – a steal, in fact.