The summer heat may still be lingering, but the start of training camp brings with it a renewed sense of excitement for Seattle Kraken fans. Among the most anticipated prospects is Shane Wright, the fourth-overall pick in the 2022 draft. While a full-time roster spot isn’t guaranteed, Wright’s performance in training camp suggests he’s on the verge of making a significant impact. A strong showing is crucial to convince the coaching staff and front office that he’s ready for the NHL.
A unique development path
Comparisons between Wright and Matty Beniers are inevitable, given their similar draft positions. Granted exceptional status, Wright joined the OHL at 15, a rare feat achieved by only nine players in CHL history. The most recent example is Landon DuPont, who recently debuted for the Everett Silvertips. However, the pandemic disrupted Wright’s development, because the OHL canceled the 2020-21 season.
This meant Wright entered the NHL entry draft with two junior seasons compared to Beniers’ three years of experience (USHL, NTDP, NCAA). At 18, Wright had effectively outgrown the OHL but was not eligible for the AHL, and with only two years of junior hockey, the NHL was just out of reach. Due to the lost year and coming up just shy of the requirement to be eligible anyway, Wright was granted an exception during the 2023-24 season to play in the AHL and has now completed four years of developmental hockey (OHL, AHL) – aligning with Beniers’ trajectory.
Rookie camp
Despite not technically being a rookie, Wright embraced the “veteran” role in rookie camp last week, exhibiting strong leadership qualities and outshining his peers.
“I’m trying to be a mentor and leader for the younger guys coming in and help them out through the process,” Wright said, demonstrating a maturity beyond his years. His dedication was evident, not only in his on-ice performance but also in his willingness to assist teammates in acclimating to the professional environment. Recognizing his exceptional skills and experience, the Kraken decided to keep Wright in Seattle for additional training rather than sending him to the LA Rookie Faceoff.
ShaneWright (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Training camp
Wright has been frequently centering a line with wingers Tye Kartye and Jordan Eberle in training camp. This trio has shown promising chemistry, building upon the connection Wright established with Eberle during his eight-game stint with the Kraken at the end of last season. The line has consistently looked impressive in camp, showcasing Wright’s ability to keep pace with and contribute offensively alongside established NHL players. This is a positive indicator of his readiness for the upcoming season.
Leading by example
Despite his young age, Wright’s leadership qualities are undeniable. Whether it’s arriving early for practice, assisting teammates with drills, or cleaning up after practice, Wright consistently goes above and beyond. His dedication to the “little things” sets him apart from his peers. When asked about his early arrival, Wright shrugged it off, stating, “I like being early and don’t like being late. I take advantage of the free ice to shoot around and warm up.” His work ethic is evident in every aspect of his game, from his on-ice performance to his commitment to team culture.
While the final score of the preseason game against the Flames was a disappointment, there were several positive takeaways, including the standout performance of the Kartye-Wright-Eberle line. The line generated a team-high 11 shots on goal, showcasing their offensive potential. Their ability to cycle the puck and create high-danger scoring chances bodes well for the upcoming season. Kartye’s high-energy play provided a spark, allowing Eberle and Wright to cycle the puck effectively and generate offensive pressure.
Coachella Valley Firebirds
Wright spent the majority of last season with the Coachella Valley Firebirds. In 59 regular-season games, he tallied 47 points (22 goals, 25 assists). His production surged in the playoffs, averaging over a point per game with 13 points (4 goals, 9 assists) in 12 games. This impressive performance made him the AHL’s leading scorer among 19-year-olds.
The Firebirds, a two-time Calder Cup finalist, provided Wright with valuable playoff experience. He appeared in 36 playoff games over the past two seasons, gaining firsthand knowledge of the intensity and grind of postseason hockey. Although the Firebirds fell short of winning the Calder Cup, Wright’s experience in these high-stakes games will undoubtedly benefit him at the NHL level.
Head coach Dan Bylsma
The centerman’s 103-game experience (regular season and playoffs) under the guidance of current Kraken head coach Dan Bylsma is a significant advantage. Bylsma praised Wright’s development, saying, “How he improved, how he grew and how he plays is an advantage for him. Having had that experience, I know that I believe in and trust him as a player.” Bylsma’s familiarity with Wright’s tendencies and strengths allows him to deploy him optimally. The fact that Kartye also played under Bylsma could be a contributing factor to their line placement in camp.
Dan Bylsma (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Looking the part
Based on his performance last season and his start to training camp, Wright appears NHL-ready. He seamlessly skates alongside NHL players, demonstrating a level of skill and maturity that sets him apart from other prospects. Wright’s elite skillset, coupled with his unwavering work ethic and emerging leadership qualities, position him to make a significant impact at the NHL level. As training camp progresses, Wright’s trajectory remains positive, and he’s poised to earn a permanent spot on the Kraken roster come Oct. 8.
If you have any comments or questions, please leave them below. You can find me on the X at @blaizg.
Training camp officially gets underway Thursday, which brings with it a number of fun topics to monitor and discuss. The Kraken have a new coaching staff, a couple splashy offseason acquisitions, and a top prospect likely making the jump to becoming a full-time NHLer.
Those changes bring burning questions, though, so our team got together to talk about them. Enjoy!
Q1: Did anyone impress you at rookie camp or during the Rookie Faceoff games?
John Barr: I watched Andrei Loshko from time to time last season when he was playing for the Rouyn-Noranda Huskies in the QMJHL. I generally liked what I saw, but it’s always tough to make a thorough analysis when you’re only catching periodic views on a less-than-ideal streaming feed.
In rookie camp, he helped confirm my impressions by playing well on both sides of the puck and scoring a goal during the first showcase game in LA. He looked like one of the most developed prospects, and I’m curious about what the Kraken’s plans are for him. He’s eligible to play for the Coachella Valley Firebirds this season, but he remains unsigned by the Seattle Kraken. They must sign Loshko by June 1, 2025, or they will lose his rights, enabling him to sign with any team.
Blaiz Grubic: Finnish goaltender Niklas Kokko showcased his impressive skills during both rookie camp and the prospect game against the Colorado Avalanche. The 2022 second-round pick allowed just one goal and posted a .966 save percentage. He’s expected to play for either the Coachella Valley Firebirds in the AHL or the Kansas City Mavericks in the ECHL. Both teams will stream their games on FloHockey, so I’ll be tuning in to watch his development on North American ice this season.
Curtis Isacke: Lleyton Roed stood out to me with his pace, polish, and compete level. He probably should stand out as one of the oldest players in camp, but it’s not like he’s a multi-year AHL veteran at the end of the (ahem) road. He got into 10 games for Coachella Valley last season and is likely in line for a full slate of games this year. I wonder whether he can carve out a niche as an NHL checking forward in the future. He’s never going to be a top-of-the-roster scorer, but could he be a player who keeps the pace up, pressures opponents at even strength and on the penalty kill, and uses his speed for opportunistic strikes? I’m curious to find out more after a solid camp.
Darren Brown: Alright, well, you guys took all the obvious ones, but what about Nathan Villeneuve? At 18 and having just been drafted this past summer, he still has a long way to go before he’s NHL-ready. But he’s definitely pesky, and if he makes it to the big club one day, he’s going to be extremely annoying for opponents. I like what he brings.
Q2: Any other takeaways from watching the rookies at rookie camp?
Blaiz: The Firkus Circus is in town! Jagger Firkus, last season’s leading CHL scorer with 126 points, made a position switch from center to right wing. With the Kraken drafting Berkly Catton and already having Matty Beniers and Shane Wright at center, that change could make sense for Firkus’s long-term viability.
Firkus performed well at right wing, scoring one goal and three assists in two Rookie Faceoff games. One thing to keep an eye on: Catton was awarded one of the alternate captain roles, and Firkus was not. This could just be a “sharing the wealth” situation, but we’ll be looking for Firkus to emerge as a leader among the younger guys at training camp.
Darren: Yeah, I wouldn’t read too much into that Rookie Faceoff captaincy thing, although maybe it does say something about Catton’s maturity, considering he was one of the younger guys there.
My other takeaway? Lil’ Jani Nyman is a big kid. We knew this already, but I forgot just how enormous he looks on skates when he’s up close. It was fun watching him get paired up against Ville Ottavainen in drills.
John: It was interesting how much the older guys stood out compared to the younger ones, even though there’s only a year or two difference between some of them. Maybe this should’ve been expected, but guys like Logan Morrison, Tucker Robertson, Jacob Melanson, Ottavainen, and several others looked much closer to making it to the NHL than the younger guys. Both Ottavainen and Melanson seem ready to step into some NHL games if injuries force the Kraken to lean on Firebirds players in a pinch. I wouldn’t be surprised if both of them get called up at some point.
Curtis: What struck me most was the sheer number of intriguing players. Even without a few European professionals (like Oscar Fisker Mølgaard and Visa Vedenpää) and the college players, there were potential NHLers all over the ice. In past rookie and development camps, the total number of players was either much lower or the group was padded out with invitees. That wasn’t the case this time. As we mentioned in our prospect ranking last week, the “middle class” of Seattle’s prospect pool is incredibly deep, and it would be the envy of almost any organization.
Q3: Anything you are looking for during the first week of training camp?
Curtis: There’s a lot happening in the first week of training camp. Most of the rookies will still be around, looking to make an impression. The veterans are getting up to speed with a full-speed, competitive environment. And this year, we have a new coaching staff implementing its camp.
It’s that last part that will have my attention early on. What energy and compete level does the staff set? How are they deployed in managing specific drills and players? We’ve credited Jess Campbell and the Coachella Valley staff in the past for developing the skating games of Tye Kartye, Logan Morrison, and Shane Wright. How does that manifest, if at all, in what we see on the ice from a technique and drilling perspective? And then, of course, there’s the question of X’s and O’s. Do we start to see different breakout, neutral zone, or in-zone schemes practiced? I’ll be watching the coaching closely.
Darren: I touched on this briefly in the “Five Storylines” article I published Wednesday, but I’m really interested in seeing how Matty Beniers and Shane Wright perform. The Kraken are shaping up to be a three-headed monster of young stars once Catton arrives on the scene, but this year is critical for Beniers and Wright to each take big steps in their young careers. While Beniers has secured a huge seven-year contract, he should still be motivated to return to the form he showed in his rookie season. And Wright must be champing at the bit to make the full-time NHL roster—and be a key contributor—for the first time.
Blaiz: I’m most excited to see the Kraken back on the ice and skating together. With a stronger roster on paper than last year, there’s plenty of reason for optimism. While all the gameday roster spots seem to be filled, assuming Wright and Evans take full-time spots, the competitive nature of training camp could lead to surprises. Players like Winterton, Morrison, Roed, Robertson, Melanson, and Ottavainen could make strong cases for roster spots and potentially force some tough decisions from the front office.
John: Like Blaiz, I’m just really excited to see the team back on the ice, and I don’t think I’ve ever been more eager to watch a preseason game. If I had to be more specific, I’d say I’m excited to see how the power play units will work. A lot can and will change with the power play, but we should get an early look at how Brandon Montour and Chandler Stephenson might fit into the Kraken power play this season.
Q4: What is your biggest question for the Seattle Kraken that you expect to be answered in training camp?
Blaiz: My biggest question is whether the Kraken will make a trade to address their cap situation. With only a sliver of cap space left if they were to carry no extra players (that won’t happen), the team is in a tight spot. While the emergency recall option could provide temporary relief, it’s not a long-term solution.
The emergency recall provision allows the Kraken to exceed the cap by $875K (league minimum $775K + $100K). To use this, the Kraken would have to play at least one game with fewer than 18 skaters and two goalies. Given the front office’s playoff aspirations, a trade seems more likely. Sound Of Hockey’s own John Barr has already speculated on potential trade candidates, and training camp will offer a clearer picture of the team’s roster needs and trade possibilities.
Darren: Blaiz nailed it—that’s the biggest question.
Curtis: I expect to have a better handle on Shane Wright’s trajectory and role by the end of camp. Is Wright the player who looked fast, confident, and like a heady facilitator in his few games last spring? Or does he still look a bit green, playing reactively to NHL pace and physicality? The steps he took in Coachella Valley last season make me confident that last year’s NHL stint wasn’t fool’s gold. But he needs to prove it on NHL ice. If he does, we’ll start looking at his power play role and how his even-strength deployment compares with Matty Beniers. Is Wright attached to a steady veteran or trusted to take control of a top line? We’ll learn more as the season progresses, but I expect to know much more in three weeks about where Wright fits in this year.
John: There are a lot of questions that will take longer than training camp to answer, but like Blaiz said, you have to wonder how they’ll figure out their cap situation. Technically, they can start the season with a cap-compliant roster of 21 players, but only three out of 32 teams started that lean last year. Something’s got to give, and I imagine it’ll be resolved by the end of October at the latest.
Q5: What player has the most to gain or prove during development camp?
Curtis: Andre Burakovsky feels like he has a lot on the line early in the season, and it starts in camp. With a new coaching administration focused on a speed-based, attacking style that plays to Burakovsky’s strengths, he’s set up with every opportunity to recapture his pre- and early-Kraken form. We know he’s been plagued by injuries over the past 18 months and struggled to find his place in last year’s stagnant offense. I’m eager to see if the coaching staff has a plan to tap into his talents and if Burakovsky comes back with a renewed jump in his step.
Blaiz: I’ll be keeping a close eye on Ryan Winterton during the first week of training camp. Winterton not traveling to the LA Rookie Faceoff tournament suggests he’s higher on the depth chart than previously thought. With the Kraken needing to fill out their roster and the potential for a trade to clear cap space, Winterton could have a real opportunity to earn a spot. At 21, playing time is crucial for his development. If he continues to impress during camp, he could secure a spot on the gameday roster and contribute to the Kraken’s success this season.
John: I think we’ve all slotted Shane Wright into the roster this season, but he still needs to show up, so I’d say he has the most to prove this camp. I think it’s important for him to feel like he’s truly earned his spot and that he’ll help make the team better.
Darren: I think Beniers and Wright are obvious answers here, but what about newcomers Chandler Stephenson and Brandon Montour? Joining a new team often comes with growing pains, so will they slot right in and start producing? I’ll be watching for signs of chemistry between these two high-profile acquisitions and their linemates, especially in Stephenson’s case.
Is there anything you’re looking for during training camp? If so, share it with us in the comments section.
The Seattle Kraken participated in the 2024 Rookie Faceoff hosted by the Los Angeles Kings this weekend, the first time they have taken part in such a prospect tournament. Seven teams participated in the series, but the Kraken rooks played in two games.
Colorado Avalanche, Saturday, Sept 14 – Kraken won 5-1
Vegas Golden Knights, Sunday, Sept 15 – Golden Knights won 5-3
New Coachella Valley Firebirds coach, Derek Laxdal, emphasized that this would be a “business trip” for the Kraken youngsters, and they did turn in a decent performance that taught us quite a bit about Seattle’s future. Here are our Three Takeaways from the series.
Jagger Firkus stresses the value of rookie tournament in finding the next level of compete and in getting to know the newly drafted rookie #SeaKraken as well. The message from Coach Laxdal was the LA tournament is a “business trip.” pic.twitter.com/HKSTGaXYZ7
Niklas Kokko started against the Colorado Avalanche on Sept. 14, performing exceptionally and stopping 29 of 30 shots. Despite the Seattle Kraken coming out flat-footed and being under heavy pressure for the first 10 minutes of the game, Kokko remained calm and made timely saves, keeping the game tied 0-0.
Buoyed by Kokko’s strong performance, the Kraken rookies exploded for three goals in the second period and never looked back. They easily defeated the Avalanche 5-1. Kokko played strong positionally and never let the Avalanche back into the game. The solitary goal was scored on a power-play rebound late in the third period.
Kokko’s development this season will be closely monitored, as he prepares to adjust to the North American pro game. He will play in either in the AHL or ECHL this season, but from this small sample size of one game, he looks like he can play.
Takeaway #2 – Players that impressed
Two players surprised with their excellent play: Andrei Loshko and Nathan Villeneuve.
Loshko lights the lamp
Loshko was a versatile presence in both Rookie Faceoff games, contributing in all situations. He saw ice time on the power play, penalty kill, and at even strength. Despite usually playing as a winger, he was frequently deployed on the faceoff dot for Kraken special teams.
In the first game, Loshko formed a dynamic line with Jacob Melanson and Nathan Villeneuve. Their chemistry was evident as they generated numerous scoring chances. Loshko capped off the performance with a wrist shot goal from the slot.
Loshko is entering his 20-year-old season, which means he is eligible to play in Coachella Valley, if the Kraken sign him to an entry-level contract (he is currently unsigned). If Loshko keeps up his strong play in training came, reporting to the AHL is in the cards.
Villeneuve drops the gloves
2024 second-round draft pick, Nathan Villeneuve, proved to be a physical force on the ice. Following a strong first game, he was elevated to the top line, joining Jagger Firkus and Berkly Catton.
Despite being just 18, Villeneuve quickly made his presence felt. Known as a gritty player in the OHL, he dropped the gloves in both games over the weekend, showcasing his toughess. Villeneuve also contributed offensively, scoring a shorthanded goal on a 2-on-1 rush with Jagger Firkus.
Villeneuve seemed to earn the coach’s trust and was out on the ice late in the second game as the Kraken attempted to get the equalizer with goaltender Victor Ostman on the bench.
Honorable mentions
Jagger Firkus – Tallied one goal and three assists for four points. His defensive play was also impressive; he made some key poke checks on the penalty kill that led to a goal and a breakaway opportunity.
Jakub Fibigr – Despite playing just one game, Fibigr showcased his defensive prowess. He was not hesitant to join the attack and capped off his outing with a snipe from the left point, securing the third goal for the Kraken.
Tucker Robertson – Robertson played in the second game against the Golden Knights and was a standout despite the team’s heavy shots against. He was involved in many of the Kraken’s offensive chances and scored the second Kraken goal by tipping in a shot from Caden Price.
Takeaway #3 – Kraken didn’t quit
Colorado Avalanche – Sept. 14
Despite the 5-1 score, the Avalanche dominated play for the first period. However, the Kraken improved as the game went on and eventually took over. Kokko’s stellar performance kept the Kraken in the game until the offense could find its rhythm. Once they had scoring chances, the Kraken capitalized, netting three goals in the second period and ultimately reversing the momentum.
Vegas Golden Knights – Sept. 15
The Golden Knights controlled the play early in this game and built a 4-0 lead. Led by Jagger Firkus’ three-point performance, the Kraken showed resilience, scoring three consecutive goals to narrow the gap to one. Despite pulling goaltender Victor Ostman, the Kraken couldn’t equalize and fell 5-3 to Vegas. But, the team’s push to get back in the game showed some heart and tenacity.
As the Kraken embark on their fourth season, Philipp Grubauer and Joey Daccord are set to again share time between the pipes. Seattle was a top-10 team in goals against (232) and save percentage (.909) during the 2023-24 season, but notably, it was the only top-10 team in goals against that missed the playoffs.
Kraken goaltending has improved every year since the team’s inception. Will it take another positive step in the upcoming season?
Goalies under contract
Grubauer and Daccord are the only two goaltenders under contract with NHL experience within the Kraken organization. Grubauer has three years remaining on his contract with an annual cap hit of $5.9 million. Daccord is entering the final year of his two-year contract with a cap hit of $1.2 million. General manager Ron Francis will need to make a decision on Daccord’s future within the next year, but at least to start the season, and barring injury, the goaltending positions do not appear to be open for competition.
How they fared last year
Grubauer has faced scrutiny for his performance over the first three years of his Kraken tenure, some of which is warranted; his save percentage has yet to eclipse .900 for a full season with Seattle. However, as Kraken goaltending as a whole has improved year over year, he too has taken positive steps with each campaign, with last season being his best statistically since joining the Kraken.
Grubauer missed two months due to a lower-body injury between December and February, limiting him to 36 games on the season. Even after he returned, then-coach Dave Hakstol continued running Daccord out as the starter for a couple more weeks before Grubauer finally returned to game action on Feb. 13, when he re-took the 1A goaltender role for the remainder of the season, playing in 19 games down the stretch.
During this span, he posted a .911 save percentage and a 2.52 goals-against average (GAA). If you exclude the game against Montreal on Mar. 24, when he was pulled, his save percentage improves to .918. The Kraken as a whole did not fare well in their final 30 games, going 13-14-3, but Grubauer was in net for nine of the 13 wins. He also faced tougher competition, starting seven games against playoff-bound teams compared to Daccord’s four. Grubauer finished the season with a 9-7-1 record over his last 17 starts.
The 2023-24 season marked Daccord’s full-time arrival in the NHL. The 27-year-old goaltender was not eligible to be considered a rookie but made a strong impression in his first full season. His standout moment came in front of 47,000 fans during the Winter Classic, where he shutout the defending Stanley Cup champions, the Vegas Golden Knights, 3-0.
He also played a key role in the Kraken’s franchise-best nine-game winning streak. Unfortunately, following the streak, the Kraken went 2-6-1 and fell out of playoff contention. Daccord finished the season with 50 games played and ranked sixth in the NHL in GAA (2.46) and save percentage (.915). However, he cooled off in the latter part of the season, finishing 4-7-2 with a .898 save percentage and a 2.73 GAA from mid-February onward.
Joey Daccord and Yanni Gourde answer questions following the 2024 Winter Classic. (Photo/Darren Brown)
Who is the starting goaltender?
Both goalies made a case to be the starter with their performances last season. But who will ultimately snag that “1A” role to start 2024-25?
The case for Grubauer
Grubauer finished last season strong and has the experience and contract to be the Kraken’s starter. Though that big contract isn’t the reason to give him the job, the Kraken (and I) want to see him succeed, and he’ll be given the opportunity to do so. At 32 years old, staying healthy, getting into a rhythm early in the season, and continuing his solid play from last season are crucial.
The case for Daccord
Daccord excelled when Grubauer was sidelined, leading the Kraken to a 12-7-3 record with a .935 save percentage and a 1.996 GAA—numbers that would be worthy of Vezina consideration if maintained for a full season. However, these numbers dropped once Grubauer returned, and the Kraken faded from the playoff discussion. New head coach Dan Bylsma has seen Daccord’s success firsthand for two years at the AHL level, which means he will not hesitate to swap goalies if either netminder struggles.
Philipp Grubauer (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Joey Daccord (Photo/Brian Liesse)
The “Starter”
My projection is the Kraken will likely continue their 1A/1B goaltender strategy in the 2024-25 season, with Grubauer starting as the 1A and Daccord as the 1B. I project a 60/40 split in starts, but this will be fluid as the season progresses. Hopefully, the coaching staff can get both goalies operating at peak performance, giving the Kraken a stable duo for the entire season. Grubauer’s play at the end of last season is the main reason for getting the 1A role, but he will have to work and continue to perform to keep it. Competition here is a good thing.
Coachella Valley Firebirds
Three goalies are expected to compete for the AHL affiliate roster this year.
Ales Stezka: Signed a one-year, two-way deal.
Niklas Kokko: Drafted in the second round of the 2022 NHL Entry Draft.
Victor Ostman: Undrafted free agent signed from the University of Maine.
One of the younger goalies, Kokko or Ostman, will likely play in the ECHL with the Kansas City Mavericks. Kokko is transitioning from Liiga and will need time to adjust to the North American game. Ostman recently signed as a free agent out of college. My hunch is that Ostman will be assigned to the ECHL, Kokko will be the backup in Coachella Valley, and Stezka will be the starter. If the Kraken need to recall a goalie during the year, it will be interesting to see who they bring up. Stezka is waiver-eligible and could be claimed by another team, while Kokko and Ostman are exempt from waivers, though that shouldn’t prevent Stezka from getting a callup if he’s needed at the NHL level. All three goaltenders have zero NHL experience.
To be clear, goaltending was not the Kraken’s issue last year. With a solid blue line, if they can continue to improve in this area, they will be a very difficult team to score against. However, I expect some regression as the Kraken focus on increasing goal scoring, as the extra pressure to create offense could lead to defensive lapses. Bylsma has two quality goaltenders, but the depth chart ends there, so Seattle will also need good health from Daccord and Grubauer. Assuming both do remain healthy, competition between Grubauer and Daccord should help push each goaltender to get better.
I’m ready with the “Gruuuuuuu” and “Joey, Joey, Joey” chants when the Kraken hit the ice in a few weeks. If you have any comments or questions, please leave them below. You can find me on the X at @blaizg.
The Seattle Kraken have been active this offseason, making a splash in free agency and shaking up the coaching staff. With the NHL preseason starting in just over a month, we wanted to go over what we expect to see from the Kraken under new bench boss, Dan Bylsma.
Coaching style
Bylsma’s approach to coaching stems from the relationships he is able to build. We often hear that he is well-prepared, direct, and clear in his messaging, and he creates a balance between being firm on what the player needs to do to succeed while keeping the atmosphere light and positive.
One comment we’ve heard on his coaching style is that his offense relies heavily on the stretch pass, where his players leave the defensive zone early and try to receive a long pass for an odd-man rush. This worked in Pittsburgh, where they had highly skilled players, but can the Kraken replicate that success? His time in Coachella Valley showed that he has updated his style to match the players on his team and adopted a similar system to what the Kraken were using under Dave Hakstol. So, perhaps his approach to systems in Seattle will be different to that of his time with the Penguins.
Buzz words
Dan Bylsma’s coaching style is all about a fast north-south transition game. (**Editor’s Note: That is a bit of an inside joke from one of the Sound Of Hockey Patreon Mailbag sessions.)
Thank you to Sound Of Hockey Patreon member Mike N. for submitting a question and triggering this article. Mike asked, “… what should we be looking for when the team takes the ice in preseason?” as well as some definitions for some buzz words around Bylsma’s coaching style. Let’s start with some definitions:
Transition game – How the team moves from defense to offense. Typically, speed and control contribute to a better transition game.
Fast – When mentioned in the same breath as coaching, this typically refers to the pace at which the team gets the puck out of the defensive zone and through the neutral zone.
North/South – North is the offensive zone and South is the defensive zone. It involves excelling in both zones and getting up and down the ice quickly. Our own Darren Brown wrote about systems and “playing fast” back in April.
Really, the above words can be used in any combination to describe what any team or coach is trying to do. If there are other buzz words causing confusion, feel free to comment below and we will try to define them.
Indicators of success for Bylsma
Preseason games have a few purposes: one of which is to practice and fine tune for the regular season, and another of which is to determine who makes the final Opening Night roster. And while personnel for NHL teams during preseason can vary dramatically from game to game, we should start to get a glimpse at Bylsma’s strategies during these games, as his players put systematic tweaks into practice. Here’s what we will be looking for in these games.
Dan Bylsma (Photo/Brian Liesse)
North/South
North (offense)
The No. 1 goal for the Kraken this season should be to increase scoring if they are to have any success. Seattle was 29th in the NHL in goals scored in 2023-24. This can be tracked simply by looking at the goals scored per game, but this does not take into account the quality of opponent. Another statistic to consider is high-danger shots. Seattle was also 29th in the NHL for high-danger shots at 252 during the 2023-24 season, per Moneypuck.com, which tracks high-, medium-, and low-danger shots.
For the eye test folks, you will want to watch if the Kraken are getting shots from between the face-off dots. Under Hakstol, the Kraken played a possession game and cycled the puck along the boards looking for an opening to get the puck into the high-danger areas. Many of their shots, though, ended up coming from the points when they struggled to get pucks to the middle. We do not expect the approach to change dramatically, but watch if the Kraken are able to get the puck off the boards more frequently.
Another big part of offensive success comes from the power play. New assistant coach Bob Woods will be in charge of running the power play with Jessica Campbell also providing guidance. The Kraken have seen improvement year-over-year with the power play, topping out at 20.7 percent last season. This ranked the Kraken in the middle of the NHL, but continued improvement will be welcomed. Seattle has upgraded personnel for this area as well with the additions of Brandon Montour and Chandler Stephenson, so perhaps these changes will give the team a boost with the manpower advantage.
Read more about the Kraken power play in an article by our own John Barr. Once again, it’s important to focus on where the shots are being taken; more shots from within the face-off dots will lead to more offensive success.
South (defense)
There is not much to change on the south end of the ice, as the Kraken were eighth best in the league in goals against with 232. Out of the top 10 teams in goals against, the Kraken were the only team to not make the postseason. With the addition of Montour and the expectation that Ryker Evans makes the Kraken full-time this year, it does seem to shift the mindset of the D corps to lean more offensive, so it will be interesting to see how Seattle’s play in its own end evolves.
Moneypuck.com also tracks high-, medium-, and low-danger shots against. The Seattle Kraken were No. 1 in the NHL for allowing the fewest high-danger shots against (239), second at medium-danger shots (577), and 19th at low-danger shots (2727). This highlights that under Hakstol, the Kraken would give teams shots from low-percentage areas but really protected the more dangerous areas. If the Kraken are to continue their defensive effectiveness, watch for shots against to continue coming from the perimeter and from farther away from the net.
Fast transition game (controlled zone entries versus dump and chase)
The first few years of Kraken hockey featured a primarily dump-and-chase style. The Kraken would shoot the puck deep into the offensive zone and then use a forecheck to control it. The jury is still out on whether this was Hakstol’s preferred way to gain the zone or the best he could do it with the players he was given. Hakstol’s approach was partly defensive as well, as the other team cannot score if the puck is in their defensive zone. Bylsma will face similar personnel challenges, as the Kraken still lack elite offensive punch.
There has been a lot of research on the benefits of controlled zone entries. Research by Eric Tulsky and Thibaud Chatel is a good place to start if you want some additional reading. To summarize, successful controlled zone entries lead to a two-fold increase in shots on goal compared to dump and chase. This is something else to keep in mind while watching the games to determine if the Kraken tend to carry the puck into the zone or use a dump-and-chase approach. This will continue to evolve into the regular season as other NHL teams finalize their rosters and tweak their defensive play.
Players to watch
There are many interesting players to watch during training camp and preseason. We’ve divided these players into three groups: new free agents, Coachella Valley Firebirds, and players returning to junior hockey.
Two players new to Coach Bylsma’s system are free-agent signings Stephenson and Montour. Both are expected to be key contributors on the Kraken’s top lines. Identifying their linemates and seeing how on-ice chemistry develops during preseason will be a crucial storyline to follow.
Joining a new team as a free agent can be a rocky road for some players, so getting off to a good start will be important for these two players, who will face plenty of expectations to produce right away.
Coachella Valley Firebirds
From the 2023-24 Firebirds roster, two players stand out: Shane Wright and Ryker Evans. They are widely expected to make the Kraken roster full-time this year. Evans played 36 games with the Kraken last year and 25 games with the Firebirds, and with how the roster is now shaped, the organization is clearly expecting him to be with the big club. It will be interesting to watch how these two slot into the lineup and whether they look like they can keep up with NHL-level talent during the course of a full season.
Beyond these two players, there is a group of players getting closer, but who we expect to play for Coachella Valley this year. This group will be eager to show how they have improved during Training Camp. While this is not an exhaustive list, these are players we will be monitoring closely in preseason.
Logan Morrison
Ryan Winterton
Lleyton Roed
Tucker Robertson
Jacob Melanson
Ville Ottavainen
Jani Nyman
Jagger Firkus
David Goyette
Ty Nelson
Watching how long these players stick around during camp can be an indicator of how well they are performing and how they are perceived by the Kraken. There is still at least a roster spot or two to be had, so while we don’t *expect* these players to make the team full-time, it can happen.
Look no further than Tye Kartye, who made the most of his opportunity during the 2022-23 playoffs and then continued to impress in training camp to secure his spot on the roster. Even if none of these players make the team out of camp, this is a great chance to get a glimpse of the Kraken’s future while they play against elevated talent. They also may be call-ups in the event of injuries.
Players returning to juniors
Some of the top prospects in the Kraken organization are 19 or younger and not eligible to play in the AHL. These players either have to make the Kraken full-time or be returned to the CHL.
Carson Rehkopf
Berkly Catton
Eduard Sale*
It is a long shot for Rehkopf or Catton to make the roster for the full season, but if they put on a strong showing in rookie/training camp and preseason, they could stick around for up to nine games in the regular season. After that point, their entry-level contracts are no longer slide-eligible, meaning playing more NHL games would burn the first year of their entry-level contracts. Watching how these players are fitting in and hanging with legitimate NHL players provides a preview of the future.
Sale has an asterisk next to his name because it is unclear where he will play this year. Since he was playing in the Czech Extraliga when Seattle drafted the right winger, he is eligible to play for the Firebirds this year. At 19, he is also eligible to play in the CHL. The case for him playing with the Firebirds is strengthened by his 12 points in 10 games during the OHL playoffs, but he still hasn’t hit the level of production expected of a first-round draft pick. Additionally, Rehkopf was traded to the Brampton Steelheads, so Sale no longer has a fellow Kraken prospect with him in Kitchener.
While this is just speculation, with 38 points in 49 games in the CHL, returning to the Kitchener Rangers feels like the most likely destination for Sale.
#OHLRangers have completed a trade with the Brampton Steelheads
This article was inspired by one of our Patreon Mailbags. Thank you, Mike N., for the question and your support. (**Editor’s note: If you aren’t already a Patreon subscriber, you can become one today!). If you have any questions or comments please leave them below. You can follow me on the X at @blaizg.
The 2024 NHL Draft is in the books. Today, we’ll dive deep on all eight Seattle Kraken draft picks with information from the Sound Of Hockey Big Board, three viewings at 2024 Kraken Development Camp, and all other sources of information we can muster. What kinds of players did the Kraken get? And what did Seattle tell us about the 2024 Draft with its picks? Let’s get to it.
Notably, the group includes only two defensemen. Ryker Evans has already amassed significant NHL ice time and projects to be a Kraken regular for the 2024-25 season. This will leave only defenseman Ville Ottavainen among the tier of projected future NHL contributors not yet playing in the NHL. There are intriguing prospects further away, including Caden Price and Lukas Dragicevic. And fan-favorite Ty Nelson will look to establish himself as a professional at the AHL level this year.
Overall, though, the team’s forward group has significantly more impact potential than its blueliners. This is mostly due to asset allocation. The team has spent only four picks in the top-three rounds of a draft on defensemen, against 10 picks on forwards. The team has also signed four undrafted free agents: three forwards and one goaltender. For these reasons, we suspected the Kraken would be more willing to invest on the blue line in the 2024 NHL Draft.
We did not focus as much on the team’s center depth, but Kraken general manager Ron Francis noted after Day 1 of the draft that Carson Rehkopf and David Goyette had moved to the wing full-time during the 2023-24 season. Assuming that position change holds into the future, the top prospect group above includes just three centers. Once factoring in Shane Wright’s likely graduation to the NHL, center depth was materializing as an important and under-discussed need as well.
Carson Rehkopf
The Kraken 2024 NHL Draft class
The Kraken began the 2024 NHL Draft with nine picks but traded two late-rounders (Nos. 169 and 201 overall) to Florida for one fifth-round selection (No. 141). The Kraken had previously traded their assigned fifth-round pick to Colorado for forward Tomas Tatar. The draft-day pick trade was only the second ever made by the Seattle Kraken or a team managed by Ron Francis.
Here are the eight draft picks Seattle came away with:
The team drafted five forwards, three or four of which project to play center long term, addressing a subtle organizational need. On the other hand, the team drafted just two defensemen, with the first coming in the third round. The team carried on its practice of drafting one goalie each year.
Experts give Seattle Kraken draft solid marks
Draft analysts graded Seattle’s draft positively, though typically not among the very best classes. Several questioned the team’s decision to bypass a blue chip defenseman at the top of the draft. Friend of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast Chris Peters captured the popular sentiment well, giving the Kraken a B+ grade, but with the following note:
What I do find a little concerning in the earlier days of the Kraken’s drafting, however, is the lack of high-end defensemen in their system. I don’t blame them for going for their best player available as opposed to one of the higher end defensemen when they drafted Catton, but there is going to have to come a time at some point where the team [prioritizes] defensemen in their drafting.
Mitchell Brown & David St-Louis, Elite Prospects: A
Kraken get solid value using a mixed draft strategy
In the end, the Kraken came away with six top-100 players on the Sound Of Hockey Big Board (tied for most in the draft) and five players in my top-100 data ranking (second-most in the draft). It was a good haul by those measures, but I’ll admit to feeling a bit of whiplash following the team’s draft strategy live, not to mention some disappointment at the continued lack of investment on defense.
Before the draft, I dug into data on the draft-eligible prospects, and I found a group of five statistical standouts at the top of the class that included four defensemen. After that I saw an average-or-worse draft class from the 40s onward. I believe the Kraken likely agreed with the latter point, but clearly held a different view of the draft’s top prospects.
After Macklin Celebrini–who was the consensus No. 1 overall prospect among scouts and data analysts alike–I saw blueliners Zeev Buium, Zayne Parekh, Artyom Levschunov, and Sam Dickinson as unique offensive defensemen. Buium’s 50 points in 42 NCAA games were the most ever by a first-time eligible NCAA defenseman. Parekh’s 96 points in 66 junior games was the most by a CHL defenseman in more than 30 years. Levschunov’s 35 points in 38 games were the most ever by a first-time eligible NCAA defenseman standing 6-foot-2 or taller. And Dickinson’s 70 points in 68 games were the second-most by an OHL defenseman standing 6-foot-3 or taller in the last 30 years.
Seeing an opportunity where supply met a need, I thought the Kraken would be thrilled to select any of these prospects if they were still available at pick No. 8. As it turns out, Buium, Parekh, and Dickinson were all available when the Kraken were on the clock. The team went a different direction anyway.
From a raw point production perspective, Berkly Catton out-produced all of the defensemen I named. In fact, he is one of only four first-time eligible CHL players this century to score 50+ goals and total 115+ points. The others are two soon-to-be Hall of Famers and the reigning Calder Trophy winner: Sidney Crosby, Patrick Kane, and Connor Bedard.
Looking at scoring data only, I had Catton as the sixth-ranked first-time eligible skater in the 2024 NHL Draft, ahead of each of the defensemen except Buium. Even so, I ranked Catton slightly lower than the four defensemen listed above in my final data ranking, which accounts for size (Catton is 5-foot-10), league value (Catton’s WHL is weaker than the OHL and NCAA), and relative positional value.
I suspect Seattle decided to go with Catton for one of two reasons. First, the team may have viewed offense, from a player who could be an NHL center, as the greatest organizational need. Second, the team’s scouts may not have been sold on the high-scoring blueliners, each of whom came with his own set of questions.
Also, we cannot entirely rule out the value the organization may see in drafting locally. Indeed, after Catton, the team stayed local drafting another WHL center in Julius Miettinen. Miettinen was well-regarded by most scouts, checking in at No. 41 on the Sound Of Hockey Big Board. My data score ranking had him as a second-rounder too (No. 61 overall). So, the selection didn’t stray far from consensus value.
After that, though, the Kraken draft pivoted hard toward idiosyncratic scouting favorites. I suspect this is because the remainder of Seattle’s top targets that combined in-house scouting support and strong data profiles went off the board before Seattle’s next pick in a relatively shallow talent pool.
Nathan Villeneuve, Seattle’s pick at No. 63, is a checking center with the potential to push his scoring higher with more ice time. He was No. 91 on the Big Board and No. 71 in my data ranking. Likewise, the team’s pick at No. 73, defenseman Alexis Bernier, was drafted higher than those in the public community or my data analysis suggested (No. 122 on the Big Board; No. 341 in my data ranking). Ollie Josephson, the team’s fourth-round pick, was liked by scouts both in Seattle and elsewhere (No. 77 on the Big Board), but, again, his data lagged (No. 226 in my data ranking).
Toward the end of the draft, the team turned back towards strong data players who had dropped. The Kraken selected forward Clarke Caswell (No. 53 in my data rank) and defenseman Jakub Fibigr (No. 37 on the data) with its final two picks.
Jakub Fibigr
Kraken draft picks by the numbers: young, small, and junior-heavy
The Kraken selected the youngest draft class in the league—with an average age of 18 years, two months as of the 2024 NHL Draft. The class is more than a full year younger on average than the league’s oldest class, drafted by the Vegas Golden Knights. (Coincidentally, the Kraken’s three youngest 2024 NHL Draft picks, Kim Saarinen, Josephson, and Fibigr, were all born on the same day—July 22, 2006.)
Seattle was also one of eight teams not to select any re-draft candidates. Earlier in the organization’s development, Seattle selected several overage prospects because there were no prospects from earlier drafts blocking their path. This year’s approach is indicative of a pipeline with a steady flow of prospects ahead of the 2024 class.
Beyond drafting young, the Kraken also selected a class of relatively small players. Seattle took the second-shortest skater class in the league, with their seven drafted skaters averaging just a shade over 6-foot-0. (The team also selected goaltender Kim Saarinen, who stands 6-foot-4.) Their skater class is also the fifth-lightest, averaging under 182 pounds. By contrast, the Boston Bruins class of skaters stood almost 6-foot-4 and 204 pounds on average, both the top marks in the league.
Finally, no team committed more draft resources to Canadian junior hockey players than the Kraken. Seattle selected seven players from the CHL, tied with the Calgary Flames for most in the league. Seattle’s four draft picks from the WHL were the most of any team.
Scouting notes: “Berkly Catton is one of the most fun players to watch in this draft. Give him time and space, and he’ll make you pay; try to take it away, and he’ll cut through your formation anyway like a hot knife through butter.
“It’s on the rush where he’s most effective. A series of crossovers allows him to build speed as he plans his attack, reading and reacting to what’s in front of him, using a series of weight shifts and handling moves to navigate the neutral zone as he drives play toward the opposition goal. With this ability comes cunning in the form of a sophisticated delay game that allows him to level up and attack with support or connect with trailing linemates as they enter the play.” – Elite Prospects
Pick analysis: At development camp we saw a player who combines instant-adrenaline skating with elite ice vision and self-confidence. He’s the team’s most dynamic offensive playmaker at any level and should be a one-man solution to the Kraken power play within three years.
Round 2 Pick 40: Julius Miettinen, F, Everett Silvertips (WHL) Height: 6’3″ | Weight: 207 | Shot: Left Games played: 66 | Goals: 31 | Assists: 36 | PPG: 1.02 | Plus-minus: 27 | % of offense: 0.234 Big Board rank: 41 | Highest analyst rank: 22 (Button, HockeyProspect(dot)com) | Data rank: 61
Scouting notes: “Miettinen is a well-built, strong, 6-foot-3 center who works, wins battles, plays hard and can skate. He’s got some soft skill and power to his game. He protects the puck well and can play along the wall or go to the front of the net and make plays around the crease.” – Scott Wheeler, The Athletic
Pick analysis: Miettinen brings a player profile the Kraken system is currently lacking—a physically imposing, two-way forward who projects to stick at center long term. Elite Prospectscompares him to Charlie Coyle or Boone Jenner. Like those players, his game at development camp looked simple, but on closer inspection you start to understand how he intelligently puts himself in positions to win more than his share of battles and grind out the production a team needs to win.
Scouting notes: “[Villeneuve’s] an all-around forward who plays with good pace and isn’t afraid to mix it up along the boards. Villeneuve loves to spend time causing havoc in front of the net and plays a strong off-puck game compared to many others around this point in the list. His energy and feistiness will give him a shot in the NHL, even if he doesn’t have the pure skill to burn.” – Steven Ellis, Daily Faceoff
Pick analysis: I watched at least a half-dozen of Villeneuve’s games between monitoring David Goyette and getting a feel for Sudbury’s 2024 NHL Draft prospects. His physical edge, not to mention a fight or two, always stood out. So too did his pro-ready movements and game. He’s not flashy, but it all looks NHL-translatable, at least in a depth role. Scouts see a center in the long term, perhaps as a third-liner or an outstanding fourth-line player. Villeneuve didn’t stand out at development camp, but he plays a game that should shine brighter when the physicality ratchets up in training camp.
Scouting notes: “He’s a fast, agile defenseman who really knows how to utilize his skating ability. He loves using it to keep the tempo high, whether that’s with his gap control, man-to-man defending, breaking pucks out, or activating from the offensive blueline. Despite not being overly big he really plays hard and with an edge. He might never be a true specialist on either side of special teams, but he’ll be someone who can comfortably handle the responsibilities of both.
“The Drakkar are going to be top contenders in the QMJHL for the next two seasons, and Bernier seems like the type of player who elevates his game to new heights during a deep playoff run and then never looks back.” – McKeen’s
Pick analysis: Bernier’s a fluid mover and adept puck handler, and he was one of his junior team’s best players at breaking out of the defensive zone. Perhaps his strongest trait, according to scouts, is his hockey sense, which allows him to diagnose and shut down opposing offensive chances before they materialize. On the other hand, I don’t see clear winning traits in the offensive zone, which raises developmental questions.
Round 3 Pick 88: Kim Saarinen, G, HPK U20 (U20 SM-sarja) Height: 6’4″ | Weight: 181 Games played: 23 | GAA: 2.41 | Save %: .917 Big Board rank: 105 | Highest analyst rank: 56 (Kennedy) | Data rank: N/A
Scouting notes: “His 6-foot-4 frame does offer some clear advantages, especially covering high when he’s down… but he plays a surprisingly active style for someone of his stature. He keeps excellent access to his edges and remains patient when the puck is passed around the zone, capable of making quick adjustments in either direction… He’s also a difficult goaltender to beat on clean shots because of his above-average tracking ability.” – Elite Prospects
Round 4 Pick 105: Ollie Josephson, F, Red Deer Rebels (WHL) Height: 6’0″ | Weight: 181 | Shot: Left Games played: 68 | Goals: 12 | Assists: 35 | PPG: 0.69 | Plus-minus: -4 | % of offense: 0.22 Big Board rank: 77 | Highest analyst rank: 33 (Scouching) | Data rank: 226
Scouting notes: “Josephson is the type of forward who will always earn more love from coaches than from fans. He’s a steady center who is rarely one of the most skilled players on the ice but is usually among the smartest and the hardest working.” – McKeen’s
Pick analysis: Josephson’s an impressive athlete who moves well–even if the skating could still be cleaned up a bit. He brings pace in transition and is committed in every aspect of the checking game. I’d expect his scoring production to take a step forward in his draft-plus-one season. It’s easy enough to imagine a checking role as a professional. Whether he tops out in the NHL or AHL remains to be seen, though.
Round 5 Pick 141: Clarke Caswell, F, Swift Current Broncos (WHL) Height: 5’11” | Weight: 176 | Shot: Left Games played: 68 | Goals: 26 | Assists: 51 | PPG: 1.13 | Plus-minus: 17 | % of offense: 0.269 Big Board rank: 79 | Highest analyst rank: 36 (Scouching) | Data rank: 53
Scouting notes: “He’s so, so smart with how he times almost every move he makes on the ice. Finding open ice off the puck, creating open ice with it in every zone of the ice, reading breakouts and stopping defensive zone cycles, it’s just wonderful to watch… He absolutely needs to work on the skating as many have pointed out but I don’t think it’s that big of an issue, and the data indicates that if he improves there, he could be an elite player considering how good his output is already.” – Scouching
Pick analysis: Caswell’s junior scoring data justified a much higher selection. Before the draft I had him listed–along with Fibigr, actually–as an “alternative” for Seattle at No. 73. Caswell’s scoring touch was evident at development camp. The question with him is can he develop the complimentary skills necessary to succeed at a professional level. There is a solid baseline here, though.
Round 7 Pick 202: Jakub Fibigr, D, Mississauga Steelheads (OHL) Height: 6’0″ | Weight: 172 | Shot: Left Games played: 61 | Goals: 7 | Assists: 36 | PPG: 0.7 | Plus-minus: 13 | % of offense: 0.192 Big Board rank: 98 | Highest analyst rank: 54 (Kennedy) | Data rank: 37
Scouting notes: “He has a very well-rounded skill set. His mobility is above average, with his ability to build speed quickly out of cuts and pivots being his best strength. This helps him have a real positive impact on the transition game as he skates away from pressure and initiates the breakout.” – McKeen’s
Pick analysis: Like Caswell, Fibigr’s scoring data implied a much earlier draft pick. He also looked strong in his activations at development camp, even if the defense was an adventure at times. Fibigr reminds me a bit of Ryker Evans both in stature and in their draft-year profiles. Evans ultimately went undrafted in his first-eligible draft, only to be selected in the second round by the Kraken as an overager. I suspect Fibigr could follow a similar development path and could have been a much higher pick next year if the Kraken didn’t snatch him in the seventh round. A lot hinges on Fibigr’s ability to make defensive improvements.
The Deep Sea draft
In case you’re curious, I made an alternative “Deep Sea draft” for the Seattle Kraken as the draft was ongoing using my watchlist and pre-draft work. I assumed the same late-round trade the Kraken actually made.
Having seen Catton up close at development camp, I admit that it’s tough for me to contemplate a draft class without him now. Furthermore, my draft does not address the team’s need for depth at center, which I have come to appreciate more after looking at it since the draft. My draft also does not address a common criticism I saw of Seattle’s haul—that it included too many smaller players. My group has a similar average height and weight to the real Kraken class. In the end, it’ll be interesting to compare years down the road.
More draft and prospects content?
Draft season never really ends at Sound Of Hockey. I expect to have a capstone post looking at the league-wide 2024 NHL Draft trends and the performance of the Sound Of Hockey Big Board as a predictive tool. Then we’ll return after that with a Kraken prospect ranking including the 2024 draft picks and a preseason data-only look at the 2025 NHL Draft. So, stay tuned here if you like following the draft and Kraken prospects.
Curtis Isacke
Curtis is a Sound Of Hockey contributor and member of the Kraken press corps. Curtis is an attorney by day, and he has read the NHL collective bargaining agreement and bylaws so you don’t have to. He can be found analyzing the Kraken, NHL Draft, and other hockey topics on Twitter and Bluesky @deepseahockey.
