The holiday season winding down means the World Junior Championship is also soon coming to a close.
The IIHF World Junior Championship is an annual, two-week tournament featuring the world’s premier under-20 players. Many current and former NHLers have become household names after playing in this event, ringing especially true for Kraken captain Jordan Eberle.
Four Seattle Kraken prospects have participated in this year’s tournament: Julius Miettinen and Kim Saarinen for Finland, Loke Krantz for Sweden, and Jakub Fibigr for Czechia.
While the participating players have been showing out for their home nations, things haven’t been going swimmingly in the Twin Cities when it comes to attendance.
Group A, which included the U.S., played at Grand Casino Arena in St. Paul, home of the Minnesota Wild. Canada’s Group B competed at 3M Arena in Minneapolis, home of the NCAA’s Minnesota Golden Gophers.
Games involving the United States drew relatively strong crowds, averaging about 13,500 fans per game, but attendance for other nations has lagged. Some games have drawn just 28 percent of capacity, prompting online questions about the future of the event in the United States.
The U.S. has hosted the tournament three times since 2005, twice in Buffalo, N.Y., and once split between North Dakota and Minnesota.
The 2018 tournament in Buffalo saw Canada outdraw U.S. games at KeyBank Center, with the Canada–Sweden gold medal game the only contest to draw more than 10,000 spectators (not counting the USA–Canada outdoor game).
What might be contributing is the tournament being predominantly CHL-driven. In a historically college-dominated region like Minnesota, it might be difficult for local fans to keep track of all of the players and teams involved, since many top prospects play in Canadian markets with less U.S. media coverage.
No U.S. market will ever truly match the intensity and devotion of Canadian markets, which have hosted the tournament a record 17 times and will host two of the next three.
But if there’s a region in the U.S. with the junior hockey foothold and infrastructure to replicate that atmosphere, it’s Seattle and the Pacific Northwest, which has previously attempted to attract the tournament.
The U.S. won’t host the tournament again for at least three years, with host locations set through the 2028–29 season, which leaves ample time to begin building the case for the Pacific Northwest as the next host region.
The Seattle area venues
There are many great venues in the region that could be enticing host sites. The obvious flagship would have to be Climate Pledge Arena in downtown Seattle (home of the Kraken and Torrent), which holds 17,151 spectators for hockey. It would bring in the NHL and WHL crowds, as the Seattle Thunderbirds called it home from 1989 to 2008, and the two local WHL teams have played each other there once a year for the last five years.
Typically, the host country’s group plays in the larger venue, with the other group playing in the secondary venue. The U.S. at CPA sure would be a sight to behold.
The two other WHL venues would offer similar amenities for the other group as well.
Angel of the Winds Arena in Everett is an unmatched setting for WHL games, with a seating capacity of 8,149. About 45 minutes north of Seattle, Silvertips fans consistently pack the arena during the season. Complete with deafening cowbells that add to the intimate experience, it’s a unique environment in which to watch a game.
Everett is also about an hour south of the Canadian border, well located to draw fans in the Vancouver metro area and beyond to make their way down.
There’s also a second ice rink attached to the arena that could be used for team practices.
Accesso ShoWare Center in Kent is another facility that could be used for the event. About 30 minutes south of Seattle, the Thunderbirds always have the venue rocking no matter the year.
The horseshoe-like footprint of ShoWare might make it challenging for visiting fans to maneuver, but given its proximity to Sea-Tac Airport, it would offer added ease of access for visiting fans and media flying in.
Practice venues include the aforementioned rink attached to Angel of the Winds Arena, Kraken Community Iceplex, and various other rinks throughout the Seattle metro area.
Other possible hosts
The IIHF doesn’t strictly limit itself when it comes to proximity of the buildings used. The event usually stays within the same general region, but it does branch out from time to time and utilize venues that are farther away from each other. Right now, it’s in the Minneapolis–St. Paul region, with the two cities about 15 minutes apart, but in 2026, Edmonton and Red Deer, Alb. will share hosting duties despite being almost two hours apart.
Strong arguments also exist for other venues, such as Numerica Veterans Arena in Spokane or the Toyota Center in Kennewick. Both cities offer excellent facilities and top-tier fanbases who consistently show their support. There’s also a compelling case to include Portland, or even having the Rose City serve as the primary host city on its own, given its two venues and the strength of its fan base.
But Seattle and Everett makes the most sense. It would offer ease of coordination for the event, with other factors to consider like transportation accessibility, arena availability, and things to do in the area.
There are some challenges and work-arounds too with hosting a tournament like this. If done in an NHL city, often the NHL team goes on a prolonged road trip. The Wild had a seven-game road trip to accommodate the tournament this season. That would be something to consider for the Kraken.
But what do you think? Where would you like to see World Juniors games played if they came here?
*Editor’s note: This is not a new article. This is the same seating guide that was published in December, 2023, but it has been updated with some new information for the 2024-25 season.
The admittedly biased answer to the question of where to sit at Climate Pledge Arena (CPA) is section 3, row L, seats 1-2—my season seats! But the real answer is that there isn’t a bad seat in the house. No matter where you’re seated in CPA, you’ll have a great view of the ice and a fantastic game experience.
For the 2024-25 season, we’ve refreshed this guide with the following updates:
Updated ticket pricing to reflect standard admission rates.
Added a Tips and tricks section, featuring discounted student tickets and a bathroom line navigation hack.
The King 5 broadcast desk has a new home in the Space Needle Lounge.
The Red Alert band has been dissolved, and references to the band have been removed.
In this comprehensive guide, I’ll walk you through each major section in CPA, highlighting the pros and cons of each area to help you find your perfect seat.
How to use the Kraken seating guide:
If you’re unsure where to begin when choosing your seats, you’re in the right place! The Kraken seating guide below will help you find your ideal spot. Use the table below, and click the link in each area for an overview of each section.
Consider these key factors as you choose:
Budget
End seats vs. side seats (do you prefer being behind the net or seeing the action from the sides?)
Proximity to the action vs. full-ice perspective
Section benefits and amenities
Reviewing each of these factors will help you zero in on the sections that best suit you and your group for an unforgettable game experience.
Budget
Ticket prices at CPA vary widely, with face-value seats starting around $50 and going up to $750. This Kraken seating guide breaks down seating into approximate price ranges, with most options falling between $100 and $250. These prices reflect standard admission rates, as resale prices fluctuate based on factors like team performance, the opponent, and the game night. Typically, expect lower prices for a Tuesday game against a struggling opponent and higher prices for a Saturday night matchup against a top team or Original Six team.
End seats vs. side seats
As in any sport, seats closer to center-ice (field, court, or pitch) tend to be the most desirable. In hockey, protective netting behind each goal keeps those powerful slap shots from hitting fans. When sitting at the ends of the ice, you’ll be viewing through this netting, which, while noticeable at first, often fades from perception during the game. Along the sides of the ice, you’ll have an unobstructed view, as no netting is present. Watching from the sides offers a left-to-right view of the action, while end seating provides an up-and-down perspective. Keep in mind that when sitting at the ends, the action feels distant when at the opposite end but intensely close when in front of you.
Proximity to the action vs. full-ice perspective
This choice comes down to personal preference. Sitting higher up gives you a view of the entire rink, making it easier to see plays and strategies unfold. Being closer to the ice immerses you in the speed and intensity of the game as players battle it out near your seat. Both options are exciting, but for newcomers, sitting higher can offer a broader perspective and better understanding of the game—and usually at a lower price.
Benefits and amenities
Most amenities are available in the club sections. Club seats feature options like exclusive food, club-specific restrooms, mixed drinks in your seat, and private entrances to CPA. The private club restrooms are a notable perk, as restroom lines outside the club areas are generally longer, especially during intermissions.
Going to your first game?
If this is your first game, you can’t go wrong with any seat—just choose a spot within your budget and get ready to enjoy the experience. I recommend arriving about an hour early to check out the team store and watch the warmups. Take a stroll through a few sections you might consider for future games to get a sense of how they compare to your seats.
If you’re reading this seating guide, you might also be a new fan of the Seattle Kraken. Sound Of Hockey has you covered with our Seattle Kraken: New fan’s guide – 2024 edition, helping you get up to speed on your new favorite team and sport.
Just want a quick Kraken seating recommendation?
Just get me in the building?
Opt for the 200 Level. Aim for sections opposite the press box—like 224, 225, 226, 201, 202, 203, and 204—rather than 211-217. In the higher rows (H and above) of 211-217, the “Twins” (dual scoreboards) are obstructed by the pressbox. Although there are TV screens for provided for these rows, seeing the scoreboards is part of the experience.
Best mix of value and views? There are a few great options
Kraken-shoot-twice sections in red, Visitor side (Kraken-shoot-once) sections in black
00 Lower Bowl
All lower bowl sections at CPA are numbered 1-26. Entrance to CPA is on the upper level, with an escalator ride down to the lower bowl, which is considered the main concourse (LL2). This level includes The Lair (team store) and the Living Wall. Sections 3-12 are on the Kraken’s offensive side, where they shoot twice per game, while sections 16-25 are on the visitor’s side, where the Kraken-shoot-once. The arena has two club areas: the Symetra Club (sections 26, 1, 2) and the WaFd Club (sections 13-15).
These sections sit right on the face-off dot within the offensive zone and are the only non-club, Kraken-shoot-twice sections in front of the goal line. Positioned as close to the club areas as possible without being in them, they provide a fantastic view. A railing separates these sections from the club seats on the side closer to center ice, making it impossible for people to enter or exit from that side—a benefit for those seated along the railing, as they won’t be interrupted during the game. Sections 16 and 25, on the visitor-shoot-twice side, mirror sections 3 and 12.
View from “Kraken-shoot-twice – corners” section (Photo/Brian Liesse)
The corners are rumored to be a favored vantage point for hockey scouts evaluating minor and junior players. While the Kraken-shoot-twice end is viewed through protective netting, the opposite end offers a mixed view. Seats in the first 10 rows are around $210-$240, providing a close-to-the-action experience. These corner sections offer a balanced blend of side and end perspectives. Sections 17, 19, 22, and 24 on the visitor-shoot-twice end mirror sections 4, 6, 9, and 11.
Unless you’re within a few rows of the glass, your view in these sections will always be through protective netting. Most seats are around $180, with row C (on the glass) closer to $285-$350, and rows D-J approximately $220-$240. Note that row C is the front row in these sections, offering direct glass access. It’s a popular spot to watch the visiting team warm up. If you arrive during warm-ups, feel free to join the crowd along the glass for a closer view, then settle into your seats once the crowd clears. Sections 20 and 21, on the visitor-shoot-twice end, mirror sections 7 and 8.
The top of most lower bowl sections features bar seats.
Pros:
These seats offer a great view of the ice at the lowest price in the lower bowl.
The elevated bar stools have seat backs and are not connected to the floor, so you can stand during the game if you prefer.
A small table in front of you provides space for food and drinks.
Cons:
You won’t have a view of the Twins (dual scoreboards), but there are TV screens mounted for viewing replays. Some extra stats on the Twins aren’t shown on the TVs, but it doesn’t not take away from the enjoyment of the game.
Your view may be blocked if the people in front of you stand during an exciting moment, though most fans remain seated during the game.
Getting in and out of these seats can be a little awkward, but it’s manageable.
Both Symetra Club and WaFd Club offer similar experiences, located on opposite sides of the ice. Symetra Club is on the same side as the player benches, while WaFd Club is on the penalty box side.
Buying club seats is about two things: premium seats and added benefits. Located between the face-off dots, with the most expensive seats at center ice, they provide an unimpeded view of the game without the need to look through protective netting.
Each club has its own private area with exclusive food and drink options, as well as bathrooms reserved for club ticket holders. Additional perks include the ability to have mixed drinks in your seat, coat check, larger, more cushioned seats, and occasionally a free appetizer spread. There are also a limited number of bar seats in the club sections (sections 1, 15, 26), which offer the same benefits and are priced around $195. For more on bar seat experiences, see the lower bowl section.
Pros:
Premium seat views and exclusive benefits.
The Yeet the Fish tradition, where plush fish are thrown into the stands after Kraken wins, typically end up in lub sections since there is no protective netting.
Season ticket holders get a 25 percent discount on concessions.
Cons:
Expensive pricing.
Access to the club areas requires scanning your ticket each time you enter, meaning your friends without club tickets are not allowed to join you in the club area.
The Loge Level is located at street level, meaning when you enter CPA, you’ll already be on the correct level. Sections numbered in the 100s are considered the Loge Level. The following sections are included in this area:
101-104, 111-114 – Kraken-shoot-twice side, sections range from center-ice to the corners.
115-117, 124-126 – Visiting team side, sections range from center-ice to the corners.
105-110 – Kraken-shoot-twice end of the ice.
118-123 – AMEX Club, visiting team end of the ice.
The Loge Level provides excellent views of the entire ice surface from any seat. With a steeper sightline compared to the lower bowl, you’re able to get a good perspective of the action. However, if you find yourself behind a taller person, it can be challenging to see clearly. Overall, these seats offer great sight lines for an immersive experience.
These seats run along the sides of the ice and are not obstructed by the protective netting. Pricing is comparable to lower bowl seating. Row A ensures you have an unobstructed view, although a metal-topped protective glass barrier might slightly interfere with your sightline. Being higher up, these seats offer a broader perspective of the game, allowing you to see plays develop more clearly. However, they feel a bit farther from the ice compared to the lower bowl.
Pros:
Great views of the ice to see plays development.
Easy access from CPA entry points, allowing for a quick exit after the game.
Cons:
Pricing is similar to lower bowl seats, so not much of a discount.
The concourse can feel narrow and congested during intermissions, as it serves both the 100 and 200 Levels.
Bathroom lines can be long, contributing to the congestion.
The steeper sight lines may result in people blocking your view if they lean forward, so don’t be surprised (or offended) if someone asks you to lean back.
Bar seats (~$130):
Bar seats on the Loge Level offer a full view of the Twins and a great perspective of the ice. However, the narrow walkway (~four feet) behind these seats means you’ll experience people walking behind you during the game.
These seats offer great value while still providing an exceptional view of the ice. If you’re familiar with the EA Sports NHL video game series, the view here is similar to the classic up/down perspective. The sections span both the 100 and 200 Levels. There are three price points in this section: Row A (~$150-$200), middle rows (B-H, ~$110-$125), and upper rows (J-P, ~$85-$95). For reference, row H aligns with row A of the 200 Level.
All views from these sections are through the protective netting.
Pros:
There is not a bad seat in this area, and these seats deliver on value and view.
Easy access to the Alaska Airlines Atrium, making it simple to get in and out of CPA.
Cons:
The seating is at the same level as the Twins, so you may occasionally find yourself watching the game on the Twins if you are not paying attention.
Food and drink options are limited to small stands, and lines can get long.
Bathroom lines can be an issue in this section as well.
Despite being in the 100s, many of the seats are at the same height as the 200 Level.
These seats are a mirror of the Loge Level Kraken-shoot-twice end of the ice seats (Sections 105-110), with a few notable differences:
Located on the visitor-shoot-twice end of the ice
Sections extend lower than the Loge Level, with row A in line with the suite level
Rows A-C offer larger seats similar to the Symetra/WaFd Club seats
Row F is in line with Loge Level row A; row N is in line with 200 Level row A
Private entrance for AMEX Club members
Access to the AMEX Club, from other parts of the arena, is via the suite level
Private food and drink options available
Private bathrooms for club members
This section is all about the extra perks balanced with the cost. The height in this section ranges from as low as the suite level to as high as the 200 Level, offering three price points:
Row A-C (~$220-$250)
Middle rows (D-P, ~$160-$195)
Upper rows (Q-V, ~$130-$150)
Pros:
Extra benefits over regular seats, including private food and drink options.
Mixed drinks allowed in your seats.
Private bathrooms and a private entrance for club members.
Cons:
Price can be steep for the additional perks.
While getting to the main sections of CPA is not difficult, being located on the suite level can create some separation from the rest of the arena, which can make it a little harder to get to other areas of the arena.
The 200 Level sections run along the sides of the ice. Sections 201-204 and 224-226 are on the players’ bench side, while Sections 211-217 are on the same side as the penalty boxes and the press box. These sections offer the best value, providing a good view of the ice at a lower price point than other areas in the arena. Row A, being the front row, will be the most expensive (~$150-$170) in these sections.
It’s important to note that the higher seats on the press box side are positioned behind the press box. While you can see the full ice surface, you won’t have a clear view of the Twins (dual scoreboards). Instead, you’ll see TV screens mounted on the back of the press box.
The 200 Level offers an excellent vantage point to watch the game, with views that allow you to follow the play as it develops. Access to this level is the same as where you enter CPA. Like the Loge Level, you may encounter some congestion in the concourse and bathrooms during intermissions. If it’s your first time at CPA or you’ve never explored the main level (lower bowl), be sure to take a walk down to see The Lair (team store) and Living Wall.
The 200 Level offers upper-deck seats with a full view of the ice. Sections 201-204 are located on the Kraken-shoot-twice side, while Sections 224-226 are on the visitor-shoot-twice side.
Pros:
Great value with excellent views at the lowest price.
Seats are near the entry points, making it easy to exit CPA quickly before the fans in the lower bowl have time to take the escalator back to the street level.
Full view of the Twins (dual scoreboards).
Cons:
Hallways can get congested, and bathroom lines are often long.
Steep sight lines can be challenging; people leaning forward or tall individuals may block your view, though you can usually shift left or right in your seat to find a clearer view.
These sections mirror the 200 Level players’ bench side but with a key difference: Rows F and above are positioned behind the press box, which blocks the view of the Twins (dual scoreboards). To address this, TV screens are installed so you can still see what’s displayed on the Twins, similar to the bar seats in the lower bowl.
You’ll have an unobstructed view of the ice without the protective netting in your line of sight for the entire game. However, the press box design does slightly muffle the arena’s sound, creating a subtle sense of separation from the crowd. Occasional movement in the press box gangway may also distract you from the game. If you prefer a view of the Twins, aim for rows A-E, which are below the press box.
Pros:
Cheapest seat option at CPA with a clear view of the ice.
Although not specifically designed for this, these sections are not as loud, so if crowd noise is a concern, this might be a section to try.
Cons:
Concourse congestion and long bathroom lines.
The press box can be a minor drawback if seated in row F and above, as it blocks the view of the Twins.
While CPA offers excellent views from nearly every seat, these seats rank lower in value due to their pricing. Originally, they were intended as 21+ seating with exclusive access to the Space Needle Lounge. However, now that the lounge is accessible to all fans, the premium pricing for upper-deck seats feels less justified. These sections sit above Sections 105-110 and can only be accessed through the Space Needle Lounge.
Pros:
Space Needle Lounge stays relatively empty during games, so it’s easy to grab a drink and enjoy it in your seat.
These seats flank “The Deck,” where in-game announcements and prize contests happen. Buoy, announcers, and occasional celebrities frequent The Deck, making it easier to get pictures and interact with them from here.
Bathrooms on the Space Needle Lounge level are easily accessible from these seats, allowing you to avoid long lines.
The King 5 Broadcast desk has a new home here, where you can watch Alison Lukan and Ian Furness during intermissions.
Offers a bird’s-eye view of the ice.
Cons:
The high price is steep for upper-deck seating, especially since the lounge, bathrooms, and broadcast desk are now open to all fans.
These seats are the ultimate experience for glass-level viewing. Accessed via elevators to the event level (LL4), Cove seating requires ticket holders to show their tickets when exiting the elevator, as this level also houses the players’ locker rooms. While there are no food vendors on this level, food and drinks can be ordered directly to your seat via mobile phone—a convenient perk that means you don’t have to leave your seat, even mid-period.
Buoy, the team mascot, often visits the Cove sections, making it easy to get a photo. These seats provide an up-close, intense view of the action at your end of the ice, but views of play at the opposite end are limited, often requiring you to check the Twins (dual scoreboards). However, the Twins are almost directly above, so you may need to crane your neck or look to the opposite side for a clearer view.
Cove seating locations
Cove 4 and 11 – On the Kraken-shoot-twice side. Cove 4 is beside the visiting team’s bench.
Cove 17 and 24 – On the visitor-shoot-twice side. Cove 24 is next to the Kraken bench, allowing views of players heading to their dressing room during intermission.
Cove seating overview
Each Cove has two rows: Row AA (~$530-$750) and row BB (~$430-$550). Row AA seats are on the glass, offering the closest proximity to the action. However, row BB, can give you a hard time viewing the ice, as the seats are usually not elevated, so you are looking through people in row AA. There is an exception to this in Cove 11, where row BB seats 1-10 are elevated.
Pros:
Unmatched view of the action directly in front of you—ideal for any hockey fan to try at least once in their lifetime.
Food delivery directly to your seat.
Best location to watch warm-ups and potentially catch a souvenir puck from players.
Cons:
Limited view of action at the far end of the ice.
Row BB can have obstructed sight lines from row AA.
If you’ve made it this far in the guide, you’ve probably noticed a trend: bathroom lines can get long in many sections. Here’s a tip I learned from an interview with the Seattle Kraken Ice Breakers: ice scrapes happen during TV timeouts, and there’s a set schedule for them. The first stoppage after the 14:00, 10:00, and 6:00 minute marks of the period gives you two minutes before play resumes—just enough time to sneak out for a quick bathroom break. For the full schedule details, check out the Ice Breakers interview.
Student Rush
The Seattle Kraken are working to make NHL hockey more accessible by offering last-minute tickets to students. Tickets cost $35 for upper bowl seats and $55 for lower bowl seats. To be eligible, you’ll need to register, and more information can be found on nhl.com.
Conclusion
My goal is to encourage fans to attend as many games as possible and feel confident about their seating choices. I hope this guide helps you find a seat you’ll truly enjoy. Having experienced each area firsthand, I can confirm—there’s no bad seat in the house!
With that in mind, let’s veer off the ice and into the minutiae of game presentation for some of the most important decisions the club will make before its first game: selecting the correct arena music.
After going without fans – or few fans in some cases – in NHL arenas for more than a year, generating maximum energy in home rinks will be vital components to team success next season. We know Seattle fans can be loud, but a good soundtrack will help produce a top-notch sports atmosphere when the Kraken hit the ice.
Certain songs are inextricably associated with sports teams, producing a signature sound that defines a club and becomes a part of their identities. “Gloria” became the St. Louis Blues’ victory song after it represented a key moment in their turnaround from last place team to Stanley Cup champions in 2019. Every visiting team loathes to hear “Chelsea Dagger” play in Chicago because it means the Blackhawks scored again. Manchester City fans sing “Hey Jude” before games and after victories at Etihad Stadium. “Sweet Caroline” gets Boston Red Sox fans singing along in the eighth inning at Fenway Park. West Ham has “I’m Forever Blowing Bubbles.”
While we trust the folks at KEXP to be up to the task, Sound of Hockey’s writers have some sound opinions about what the Kraken should play for their pregame introductions, goal celebrations, victory revelry and more.
Everyone appreciates good music curation. Consider this to be a carefully crafted mixtape we’re sharing with you. So let us know what you think of our playlists in the comments area at the bottom of this page, and tell us what songs you believe the Kraken should use to get Climate Pledge Arena rocking.
Introduction song: “Can’t Hold Us” by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis
I know it’s been struck down by some on the Sound Of Hockey Podcast, but this one’s a no-brainer to me. “Can’t Hold Us” will get the audience fired up like no other song and blow the old roof off The Pledge. The music video even has a winter motif and ends up atop the Space Needle. The punchy “nah, nah, nah, nah, nah-na-na-na” parts just invite fans to sing along with all the gusto of European football fans. Macklemore is a part owner of Seattle Sounders FC and a loyal fan of all Seattle sports teams, although he might have some explaining to do about the jersey he wore at a 2017 concert up in Vancouver.
Goal song: “Everlong” by Foo Fighters
A goal song will, hopefully, be played a lot. It needs to be an appealing earworm that people won’t get sick of. If I was sentimental for a hockey-themed song, I might lean toward something from the Tragically Hip or Warren Zevon’s “Hit Somebody.” Despite the nostalgia of Seattle Thunderbirds fans, going the Gary Glitter “Rock ‘n’ Roll Part 2” route won’t fly even with a chorus that has some na-nas or yeah-yeahs to sing or chant with.
I considered Jimi Hendrix, Heart, Nirvana, Pearl Jam and other Seattle music greats but kept coming back to “Everlong.” You get about 35-40 seconds to use after the red light flashes, which is perfect for the guitar and drums build-up near the end and through the last chorus:
“And I wonder “If everything could ever feel this real forever “If anything could ever be this good again “The only thing I’ll ever ask of you “You’ve got to promise not to stop when I say when”
Victory song: “We Win” by Duff McKagan’s Loaded
This one is a little obscure, but it’s a catchy sports anthem that is Seattle in its heart. McKagan is a class act and a hardcore sports fan (full disclosure: I was his editor when he wrote a column for ESPN.com) who bursts with civic pride for his hometown. I admire and respect McKagan immensely for surviving his own incredible personal comeback and for being a man of character. And this song kicks ass. Forgive me for going a little Ron MacLean on you again:
“Some day “We might find “The victory “Is well worth the bitter fight”
Just imagine fans filing out of The Pledge into the streets of Lower Queen Anne after another Kraken victory singing together, “We win, we win, we win, we win, yeah we win.”
I hate clichés and always look for a different approach. My choices are not going to be popular, but that is precisely the point. I want Seattle to have a truly unique experience. My desire is that these songs are distinctively Seattle across all of hockey. I do not hate Macklemore’s music, but the fact I hear him in literally every hockey arena I visit including Angel of the Winds Arena for Silvertips games and accesso ShoWare Center for Thunderbirds games disqualifies him from my list, regardless of his Seattle roots.
Introduction song: “You On The Run” by The Black Angels
For the intro song, I want something dark and ominous as the legend of the Kraken. It will be loud, and I want it to strike fear in the opposing team’s hearts and minds. I want the visiting team to be defeated before the puck is even dropped.
Honorable mention: “Wolf Totem” by The HU, “Angel” by Massive Attack
Goal song: “Turnaround” by Nirvana
The goal song needs to hit you right away with no build up. It also needs to be fun and might unknowingly get people moving when they hear it.
The victory song gets people moving and shaking. The right song could get some fan participation. Imagine a fan chant of “Oh yeah, all right, hell yeah, that’s right” after the Kraken seal the victory.
I hate most popular music so I’m going to go off the board but still try not to venture too far out into left field for Kraken songs. Hate is probably too strong of an emotion, but I find most pop music boring and its use at hockey arenas is overdone and obvious. We have a chance to tap into some great bands that don’t get regular airplay. So, let’s do that.
Introduction song: “The Nights of Wine and Roses” by Japandroids
This could be the ultimate get hyped song by a pair of Canadian maniacs. Yes, just two guys make all this beautiful noise. But what else to get the crowd going than a line like “We yell like hell to heavens.” Japandroids are from Vancouver, B.C., which could be problematic because the Canucks have used some of their music in the past. But Seattle is obviously better.
Goal song: “Uncontrollable Urge” by Devo
Most people know Devo from “Whip it” and nothing more. That was probably their least interesting song. “Uncontrollable Urge” is one of their better tunes. It’s fast, upbeat and imagine the Climate Pledge crowd all yelling “yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah” along with this classic track. It has goal song written all over it.
Victory song: “Everyday Sunshine” by Fishbone
We all like sunshine. We’d all love it every day. What a happy, uplifting song to celebrate winning. It’s got horns, bass, funk, ska, and most importantly, it’s fun. This tune starts strong and builds up to pure joy by the end.
A Seattle band with a fun little song that would be the perfect soundtrack to a tilt on the ice. It’s fast paced, and when they chant “one hit” it will perfectly frame any scrap on the ice that usually ends with one hit.
Unlike some of my fellow Sound Of Hockeyers, I’m not too concerned with picking “popular songs” as long as they fit the situation. Several of these songs feature ties back to the Seattle music scene and they all, in my humble opinion, kick ass.
Introduction song: “Cochise” by Audioslave
Tipping a cap to Seattle’s music history with legendary frontman Chris Cornell of Soundgarden and Temple of the Dog fame, this song from Audioslave features a perfect build-up, is extremely upbeat and would set the tone in the arena before Kraken home games. Ignore that the song is about an Apache chief, I think it’s a good fit for a team introduction that isn’t very cookie cutter.
What it probably will be: Some intense mashup from “Pirates of the Caribbean.”
Goal song: “Bulls on Parade” by Rage Against the Machine
In this scenario, Tom Morello – who is also the lead guitarist of Audioslave – will be prominently featured at Seattle home games. In this instance, this iconic guitar riff from Morello would be a treat to hear after the Kraken’s goal horn.
What it will probably be: Something by Nirvana, Soundgarden or Pearl Jam.
Victory song: “Purple Haze” by Jimi Hendrix
This groovy guitar riff from Seattle icon Jimi Hendrix would be a perfect fit at Climate Pledge Arena. The song is catchy, upbeat and popular enough to hold the distinction of the Kraken’s victory song, but the lyrics may be a dealbreaker (not sure what Purple Haze has to do with a sea creature – or hockey for that matter).
Introduction song: “Guerrilla Radio” by Rage Against the Machine
Picture this: The lights go down in Climate Pledge Arena. A hype video plays on the state-of-the-art triangular scoreboards, with “Guerrilla Radio” blasting. Then, in sync with the 2:58 mark of the below video, the screens go black. The arena is filled with complete darkness.
Zack de la Rocha whispers into the tension of the crowd, “It has to start somewhere. It has to start sometime. What better place than here? What better time than now?” Then, BANG! Explosions! Fireworks! Goal horn!
“AW! HELL! CAN’T STOP US NOW!” de la Rocha screams, with Rage blasting away in the background.
“Please welcome to the ice, YOUR SEATTLLLLLLLLLLLE KRAAAAAAAAAAAKEN!!”
Goosebump City, population 17,000.
Goal Song: “Can’t Hold Us” by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis
Screw it, I’m doubling down.
I’ve taken a lot of heat on the “Sound Of Hockey” podcast for my opinion that this should be the goal song, with John and Andy claiming that it’s far too common in sports arenas. Fine. But you know what? It gets the people going! And other arenas don’t have the local ties to Macklemore that Seattle does. Yes, it’s a bit cliche. But also, yes, it would work great as a goal song. There’s literally a clap-and-sing-along portion built in.
I was running the Disney World Marathon at the beginning of 2019, struggling mightily around mile 18. I heard “Can’t Hold Us” playing as I shuffled through a miserably long stretch between Disney’s Wide World of Sports and Disney’s Hollywood Studios. Suddenly, my feet were hitting the ground to the beat of the music, and I was back in the game in every way. If that’s not proof that it gets the people going, then I don’t know what is.
And if you’re among the poo-pooers of this fine ditty, then go listen to John’s selections in this post and good luck cleaning up the blood that will surely come out of your ears.
Victory song: “Octopus’s Garden” by The Beatles
Why not? A victory song should just be fun. Ringo’s songs are generally the less-beloved of Beatles songs, but this one is a banger. And how many songs are out there about cephalopods?
SEATTLE — Before playing a game the Seattle Kraken are already the hottest ticket in town as the team appears to have sold out its season ticket plans.
The team says that they will still work with the remaining depositors on their list to get them into Climate Pledge Arena during the team’s first season in 2021-2022.
In a statement to Sound Of Hockey, a Kraken spokesperson says “We are approaching the final stages of our general seat selection process. We are calling each and every deposit holder to discuss membership and seating options. Each depositor will have the opportunity to access tickets.”
Every depositor will receive a call from ticket representatives to offer membership plans. These plans will allow members to have access to a number of single-game tickets as well as other perks that are still being developed by the team. There will be tiers for these plans, some offering more perks than others. Depositors will be allowed to keep their priority number on the list to use if season packages become available.
On March 1, 2018, the team collected 35,000 deposits for season tickets in a matter of hours. It was a banner day for the hopeful franchise and showed the NHL that there was a passion for NHL hockey in Seattle. The momentum from that day helped Oak View Group receive approval from the City of Seattle to build what is now Climate Pledge Arena and the NHL to approve Seattle for expansion in December of that same year.
In September the Kraken began contacting its depositors to sell season ticket packages. The process was virtual due to caution concerning the COVID pandemic and the team experienced a high retention rate from the start. The building will hold a capacity of 17,100 but not every seat was reserved for season ticket packages. The Seattle Kraken planned on holding out 9,000 seats for partial season ticket plans and individual game availability.
The Kraken experienced higher retention rates from those initial depositors than they had anticipated and are pivoting in order to include all the fans that helped launch the franchise.
It feels like a lifetime – because time has become a flat circle – but in reality, it was just two December 4th’s ago when hundreds of hockey fans packed into Henry’s Tavern in South Lake Union neighborhood of Seattle. It was early in the morning and it was cold, but the excitement and free “Return to Hockey” beanies kept everyone warm.
December 4th, 2018 was the date that NHL commissioner Gary Bettman made it official. Seattle was getting an NHL franchise.
It was a while before the team would be named the Kraken, but on that day, the NHL Seattle organization announced itself to the broader sporting world, and Seattle indicated that it was ready to become a hockey city.
The Seattle Kraken organization celebrated its second birthday Friday by officially changing its Twitter handle from the awkward @NHLSeattle_ to the more natural @SeattleKraken. Oh, and they got one of those cakes that doesn’t look like a cake until somebody cuts into it.
🎉 HBD to us! 🎉
this year we gave ourselves the best gift we could think of – a new twitter handle. so go ahead and @ us with those bday messages. 🥳 pic.twitter.com/PvqfSvaQi6
The change in Twitter handle wasn’t the only new moniker visible in Krakenworld this week.
On Saturday, two guys apparently named Scott and Doug were busy airlifting new Climate Pledge Arena signage to the apex of the historic roof of the Seattle Center venue.
After the hockey world collectively freaked out over the NHL and NHLPA allegedly not talking to each other during [checks notes] Thanksgiving week, it appears things are looking up on a return to play plan. Earlier this week, Elliotte Friedman broke down what he was hearing on the latest movement on the NHL’s plan.
.@FriedgeHNIC with the latest on talks between the #NHL and its players, including how he's hearing January 15th is a possible season start date.
Players could report to NHL Training Camps in late December or early January
Estimated return to play ~January 15th
Season should be somewhere in the range of 52 to 56 games
Playoffs would begin early May and roll through early July
As the saying goes, Keep Calm and Carry On.
The less we hear about this the better because it would indicate that both sides are talking with each other instead of trying to negotiate in public. Signs are indicating that there could be a deal in the next week.
World Junior Championship Updates
Prior to the abbreviated NHL season, we are expecting to see the World Junior Championship played in an Edmonton bubble beginning on Christmas Day and running through January 5th.
With the delay to the season, many in the hockey world were hoping to see some of the NHL players that are still young enough for the WJC take part in the tournament. Chicago’s Kirby Dach, for example, participated in Canada’s selection camp, and is expected to play a huge role for his country. Dach looked like a man amongst boys in Red/White scrimmages.
Check out Kirby Dach with a spectacular kick pass at Hockey Canada World Junior Camp! pic.twitter.com/orbhQNyQYY
On the flip side, 2019’s No. 1 overall Draft pick, Jack Hughes, will not be released by the New Jersey Devils to play for Team USA, and the New York Rangers also announced this week that they will not allow Alexis Lafreniere to take part. Nick Robertson will be allowed by the Toronto Maple Leafs to participate if NHL Training Camps have not yet started.
Here’s an interesting item to keep an eye on over the next few days, as per Best Friend of the Pod, Chris Peters:
Hoping for the best for William Eklund after positive test. He would have been a key offensive threat for Sweden. Meanwhile, this is a reminder that this week is the most critical for teams preparing for WJC as they open their camps. Positive tests now prevent entry to Canada.
Greg Wyshynski from ESPN+ (paywall) had a great column on the Angry Beaver’s roller coaster ride and the dire straits the bar is in now.
Seattle Women’s Hockey Club (a wonderful organization that has been growing and fostering hockey for a long time in the region) launched their annual fundraiser auction with plenty of items for hockey fans (pssst…there are deals to be had here).
Beyond the Sound
NCHC started back up this week in an Omaha-based bubble, and Friday’s game featuring #1-ranked North Dakota vs #4 Denver was a real barnburner. The back-and-forth battle ended with this banger of a game winner by UND’s Jordan Kawaguchi.
Finally, a strange tale played out very quickly on #HockeyTwitter Friday.
The Vancouver Sun published a story that long-time Canucks anthem singer, Mark Donnelly, was planning to sing O Canada at a rally against Covid-19 restrictions.
Canucks owner, Francesco Aquilini, quickly made it clear that he did not agree with Donnelly’s decision to support such an event. Aquilini apparently canned the tenor via social media with a single re-tweet of the Vancouver Sun’s story.
While we certainly don’t agree with Donnelly’s stance on wearing masks (or… apparently… not wearing masks), we will forever be grateful to him for giving us one of the funniest hockey videos of all time.
Fare thee well, Mark Donnelly. Please watch where you’re skating.
Darren Brown is the Chief Content Officer at Sound Of Hockey and the host, producer, and editor of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast. He is an inconsistent beer league goalie who believes that five players have to make a mistake before the puck gets to him. Follow him on Twitter @DarrenFunBrown or email darren@soundofhockey.com.
I don’t fit the bill for your average hockey fan. I’m a liberal arts graduate who spends most of my time re-watching Sherlock and reading YA novels. I didn’t like hockey, despite growing up in Minnesota, until a few years ago. With a job at a non-profit, I can’t afford an NHL Network subscription, let along tickets to a live game more than once a year. But I have become completely overwhelmed with excitement over the new Seattle NHL team.
When it was announced, it felt like my team – one I could really get behind. It was in a place I was excited to be moving to and didn’t have the baggage that other teams have. I also love the Wild, but with years of history baked into the franchise that I didn’t know about, it felt hard to call myself a fan. The Seattle team would be a fresh start and my true entry-point into a sport I was beginning to love. Planning would be ramping up just was I arrived in town, so the timing of it was perfect. (Am I a little annoyed to have lived in Seattle for almost two years with no team yet? Yes.)
Then the name debate started. I quickly realized that there were some names I and my other female friends who love the sport wouldn’t touch with a 10-foot pole. Female hockey fans have had to learn how to be discerning. We’ve carved out a place for ourselves in a league that has never made us feel welcome. We name favorite players hoping they won’t be revealed to be misogynistic messes. And while this new NHL franchise feels like a fresh start, the choice of a name could throw it all over the precipice.
Ahead of the much anticipated and much delayed name announcement, here is my definitive ranking of possible names. (These are the 15 names that have registered trademarks in place.)
Let’s start with the name that will make me erase this team from history: 15 – Totems – As well as having a misogynism problem, it’s no surprise that hockey has a racism problem. Recently, when a private group chat that (now former) player Brendan Lepsic was a part of was leaked, the NHL took the basic step of condemning his language and actually calling it misogyny, while also ignoring the racist language used in those messages. Players of color are taunted on ice, both by fans and other players. This attitude makes even die-hard fans reticent to introduce new people to a sport that feels unable to treat BIPOC with respect.
The Totems, being the minor league team in Seattle from 1958 – 1975, was one of the first names that got floated around for this hockey revival. The history of this team does not justify choosing a name that will be used derogatorily towards Indigenous people. Diehard fans of sports teams such as the R*dskins or the Blackhawks like to believe their names show respect to Indigenous people, while at the same time engaging in racist caricatures at games. Choosing the name Totems would give fans an implicit excuse to show their hidden (or not hidden) racist thoughts. Though I am hopeful this name will not be chosen, I know if it was there would be protests and I would be outside with them, not spending money on the team.
14 – Metropolitans – I know there’s history to this name, being the first team from the US to win the Stanley Cup, but let’s be truthful – it’s boring. Seattle is not so metropolitan compared to other cities in the league. I would fall asleep at a Metropolitan s game.
13 – Eagles – I’m allergic to patriotism.
(I would leave it at that, but there are also like 100 other teams called the Eagles, so let’s not.)
12 – Whales – While not a terrible name, and actually relevant to our area, the closeness of the Canucks and the history of the old Hartford Whalers NHL team make this a perplexing name choice.
11 – Emeralds – Seattle may be known as the Emerald City, but to me using a precious gem stone as a team name turns me off. Hockey is not a sport easily accessible for the proletariat. I already mentioned that as a fan I barely get to watch games (with the exception of my darling MN Whitecaps, which stream their games for free) and if you want to play hockey, there’s an extreme money mountain you need to overcome for gear and travel. I wouldn’t be disappointed if this was the name, but nor would I be filled with joy.
With the reveal of Amazon’s Climate Pledge Arena, which heavily features green-washing, the Emeralds gains a point for increased likelihood of being chosen.
10 – Seals – This name moved up and down a few times, before settling here. There is nothing wrong with it. Seals are lovely creatures. It simply doesn’t excite me. It doesn’t have the fierceness I’d want for a hockey team.
9 – Firebirds – I actually love this name a lot. It has a juxtaposition that delights me – a creature of fire & flight skating around on ice. The pitfall comes from its lack of connection to Seattle. Nothing about it makes me think of this town. When trying to find a connection, I discovered that the firebird is a figure from Slavic folklore. While King County’s population comes from all around the world, it’s not known for having Slavic immigrants. I’d rather this name go to a city that can do it justice.
8 – Cougars – Another perfectly wonderful name. I had this up higher on my list until someone reminded me that we already have the Washington State Cougars. Let’s not overcrowd it.
Now on to the good names!
7 – Rainiers – Oh mighty Rainier, it’s always a good day when we can see you in the distance. I’m not a super fan of this name for two reasons. First, the beer. I think there might be a few copyright issues that come up. Second, the history. Mt Rainier’s original name is Tahoma. Rainier comes from Rear Admiral Peter Rainier, the friend of a white explorer. I don’t think we need to add this accolade to his name.
6 – Steelheads – This name fills my two major criteria, connection to Seattle and fierceness. I would love to see an old man on the river as a mascot. More than simply the fish, this name is connected to the sports history of Seattle – there was a West Coast Negro Leagues baseball team called the Seattle Steelheads. If this name was chosen, it would be wonderful to acknowledge this history, perhaps with an exhibit in the arena or inviting the families of former players to games. Unfortunately, this could also be a huge misstep if the previous history of the name is ignored. Its main downfall though comes from how little it excites the community. Most people aren’t overjoyed with a fish taking the center stage.
5 – Sea Lions – I think this could be a really fun name. Sea lions are both playful and strong. It can highlight our connection to the water and I can already see a personality video of players meeting sea lions. One small negative on this could be logo design – a large grey mass isn’t the most interesting to look at.
4 – Sockeyes – Similar to the Steelheads, this is a pretty good name, with an unfortunate fish tie-in. I like it a bit better, because of the pun, but I can almost guarantee it will not be chosen. Romance Novelist Jami Davenport has a series of books on the love lives of the fictional Seattle Sockeyes hockey team and she is unwilling to give up her trademark. You go girl.
3 – Renegades – When I polled my friends on this name idea, I was the only one to have Renegades this high, but I’m keeping it there because it’s my list. I love the idea of going against the system. I believe it could easily tie into the Seattle punk and grunge scenes and I would be excited to support a team with this name. I will add that with the team’s new tie to Amazon, this contain a bit more irony than I can handle.
2 – Evergreens – In case you couldn’t tell by this list, I consider myself a bit of a hippie. I love the idea of our team being trees. Evergreens tops the list of names that tie in with Amazon’s Climate Pledge Arena, which does put a sour taste in my mouth. To be clear, I am overjoyed by the construction of a carbon neutral arena, no fracked “natural” gas, and all of the other wonderful environmental features that are planned. Maybe there could be environmental tie-ins at events, including volunteering opportunities? But the fact of the matter is that this whole thing is a goodwill-buying PR grab by Bezos, whose company is one of the biggest contributors to the climate crisis. Amazon has fired organizers who want to hold the company accountable to the climate crisis and Amazon’s emissions continue to grow despite claiming they will be reduced. Bezos may believe naming the stadium Climate Pledge Arena will get concerned people off his back, but he couldn’t be more wrong.
My extreme emotions about Amazon aside, I still love the name Evergreens. I don’t think the team could go with a tree for the mascot, but I would hope they don’t choose a lumber jack either. I would hope for a forest ranger, or, if they really want to go wild, a hermit.
1 – Kraken – You knew it was coming. Say it with me, “Release the Kraken!” How can you pass up this line? If there’s any name that can secure a young fan base, it’s this one. I know the odds are against its selection, but I’ve already promised myself I would be buying Seattle Kraken merch, no matter the official name.
Late breaking edition, I have heard a rumor that Kraken is the official name. But it came from someone who thought Kraken had to do with crabs, so it’s not entirely reliable.
If I had to choose which name I actually think will be picked, I will be placing a very loose bet on the Evergreens or the Steelheads. I don’t have an insight on what the Powers that Be will choose, but I have to hope it’ll be exciting. This team could be a chance to listen to hockey’s wide array of fans, instead of playing it safe with the old (white) standards. I’m looking forward to an announcement, whenever it comes.
