The first round of the NHL’s Stanley Cup Playoffs is in the books and featured goaltending controversies and injuries, two Game 7 thrillers, and another heart-breaking ouster for the Toronto Maple Leafs. Now, the hockey world turns its attention to the second round, so we’re putting together a quick pair of preview articles for what to look for in this next set of games, starting in the Eastern Conference.
The Seattle Kraken are already out working on their golf game, but the team’s front office is busy trying to fill the head coaching position as well as finding some needed scoring for next season. Here, we will consider each of the second-round playoff matchups and call out any unrestricted free agents (UFA’s) that might be of interest to the Kraken, focusing on forwards with an offensive touch. Hopefully, that can give you some players to watch while you are unable to root for the Kraken.
New York Rangers vs Carolina Hurricanes
Alex Wennberg playing against the Hurricanes. (Photo/Brian Liesse)
Season series between Carolina and New York
Nov. 2 – New York Rangers won 2-1
Jan. 2 – Carolina Hurricanes won 6-1
Mar. 12 – New York Rangers won 1-0
The Rangers also jumped out to a 1-0 series lead with a 4-3 win at Madison Square Garden in Game 1 on Sunday.
New York Rangers overview
The New York Rangers hold the season series edge at 2-1, but that is a little deceiving. In those games, Carolina only gave up four total goals and scored seven on Igor Shesterkin. Plus, Frederik Andersen sat out most of the year due to a blood clotting issue but returned in early March. Since returning, Andersen has played in 15 games (including playoffs) and went 13-2.
The Rangers won the Presidents Trophy for a reason. They scored 3.39 goals per game (seventh in the league during the regular season), have an excellent goaltender in Shesterkin, and their power play and penalty kill are top three in the NHL. Key additions at the deadline were former Seattle Kraken Alex Wennberg and former Columbus Blue Jacket Jack Roslovic. Both of these players are shoring up the depth for New York, but Wennberg is still contributing on 5-on-5, power play, and penalty kill scenarios.
One item of note for Kraken fans, Seattle received New York’s second-round draft pick in 2024 for Wennberg. If New York were to lose this series, four teams would finish above them, and the pick would improve to No. 61 (from No. 65). There are 33 picks in the second round because the Philadelphia Flyers have a compensatory pick for not signing their 2018 first-round draft pick, Jay O’Brien. If the New York Rangers win the series, Seattle’s acquired pick will fall in the 63-65 range.
Carolina Hurricanes overview
The Carolina Hurricanes are no slouch either and finished just three points behind the Rangers. The Hurricanes were eighth in the NHL in scoring in the regular season, have a very good goaltending tandem in Andersen and Pyotr Kochetkov, have the second-best power play in the league and the best overall penalty kill. Key additions at the trade detail were Jake Guentzel and Evgeny Kuznetsov. Guentzel has been a perfect fit with the team’s offense and has scored 29 points in 22 games since arriving in Carolina.
Both of these teams have a legitimate shot at winning the Stanley Cup if they can make it out of the second round. Expect this series to go the distance or close to it.
Key UFA’s to watch during this series:
Prediction: Carolina wins in seven games
Florida Panthers vs Boston Bruins
Season series between Florida and Boston
Oct. 30 – Boston Bruins won 3-2 in overtime
Nov. 22 – Boston Bruins won 3-1
Mar. 26 – Boston Bruins won 4-3
Apr. 6 – Boston Bruins won 3-2 in overtime
The Boston Bruins swept the season series, but they were all close games with two being decided in overtime. Both Boston and Florida played better on the road in the season series. The Panthers have home-ice advantage, but does that mean Boston actually has the edge in this series?
The teams are also evenly matched when looking at goals scored, power play, and penalty kill.
The Bruins are more likable than they used to be, thanks to former Kraken Morgan Geekie joining the fold.
Goaltending
The difference in this series could come down to goaltending. As a team, Florida statistically had the best goaltending in the league and relied heavily on Sergei Bobrovsky playing 57 games with Anthony Stolarz playing the remaining 25. Boston’s duo of Jeremy Swayman and Linus Ullmark was the fifth-best tandem in the league but had a much more even split of games with Swayman playing 43 and Ullmark playing 39.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out, as Stolarz was excellent in the regular season. Stolarz actually led the entire NHL in save percentage (.925) and goals-against average (2.03), but it should be noted that out of Stolarz’s 25 games, only seven were against teams that made the playoffs and zero were against teams still remaining in the playoffs. Even with Florida being the No. 1 goaltending duo, the depth that Boston has at the position is an asset. We would expect Bobrovsky to play every game for Florida, assuming he doesn’t get hurt or have a stinker, and the Bruins to continue rotating.
If things go haywire in the crease for the Panthers, Kraken legend Magnus Hellberg is waiting in the wings.
Trade deadline additions
Boston did struggle to score in their last three games, only potting four total goals. That will not get it done against Florida, and the Bruins will have to find their scoring touch again. Boston did not add any key players at the deadline, other than Patrick Maroon who has played in four Stanley Cup Finals, helping his team win in three of them.
Florida added two players of note at the deadline, Vladimir Tarasenko and Kyle Okposo. Tarasenko has been a good fit and has chipped in 14 points in 19 games. Okposo has not worked out as well and has seen his playing time reduced to 7:19 per game in the playoffs.
Key UFA’s to watch during this series:
Prediction: Boston wins in six games
Wrap up
Any one of the four teams in the Eastern Conference is good enough to hoist the Stanley Cup this year. Both series should be hard fought and exciting to watch.
Unrelated, if you’re looking for a hockey fix that has more relevance to the Seattle Kraken, the Coachella Valley Firebirds are playing a best-of-five series against the Calgary Wranglers in the AHL’s Calder Cup Playoffs.
Game 1 – May 3, 6:00 pm in Calgary (4-1 Loss)
Game 2 – May 5, 3:00 pm in Calgary (4-3 Win in overtime)
Game 3 – May 8, 8:00 pm in Coachella Valley
Game 4 – May 10, 7:00 pm in Coachella Valley
Game 5 – May 12, 3:00 pm in Coachella Valley (if needed)
Welcome back! We’re continuing on with our end-of-season Kraken Roundtable series, which we launched last week. This week, we’re getting a bit more tactical with our discussion to understand the missteps of the Seattle Kraken in 2023-24 and to look ahead to the offseason.
In this one, Blaiz Grubic, John Barr, and Darren Brown teamed up to give their thoughts.
Enjoy!
What went wrong
Darren – I’m going to get a little “hot takey” with this one, but the obvious issue for the team was scoring. We’ve talked ad nauseam about how the fourth line took a step back, but as the offensive woes dragged on throughout the season, I thought the Kraken missed the likes of Daniel Sprong and Morgan Geekie (and to a lesser degree Ryan Donato) more and more. There were so many times last season where the top two lines couldn’t score, and then all of a sudden, the fourth line would chip one in and get things going. Scoring is contagious, and when you only have a few guys that can put the puck in the net, slumps can sweep through the entire roster.
Blaiz – The Kraken could not get key wins when they needed them. During the Thanksgiving break, the Kraken held onto the second wild card spot and looked poised to turn the corner, but instead, they came back from the break with an eight-game losing streak. This losing streak included losses to bottom dwellers Ottawa, Chicago, and Montreal.
Later in the season, just before the All-Star break, the Kraken laid an egg against San Jose. A win that night would have put them in a tie for the final wild card spot, but they instead went into the hiatus on a three-game losing streak. The final gasp was the loss to Vegas on March 3 at home, when they blew a two-goal lead in the third period and lost in overtime. Following the Vegas loss, the Kraken could not break the cycle and rattled off seven more losses, essentially eliminating themselves from playoff contention.
John – I’ve mentioned it before, but for me, it was the way the season started that put the Kraken at a severe disadvantage. They scored one goal or less in five of their first six games, setting a challenging tone for the rest of the season. While they flirted with a playoff position at times, they consistently took a step back whenever they got close to solidifying themselves as a contending team.
Pleasant surprise
John – The goaltending performance this year was excellent. The team finished ninth in the league in save percentage overall, but since Dec. 1, the Kraken ranked third in the entire NHL. Given the challenges the goaltending position has presented in the first two seasons, this improvement was quite surprising. Joey Daccord really stepped up when the team needed a boost, especially highlighted by his performance in the Winter Classic. Additionally, Philipp Grubauer showed great consistency in the second half of the season, which bodes well for the team heading into next season.
Blaiz – The Kraken recently announced that most Kraken regular-season games will be broadcast on King/Kong and Prime Video, removing the need for an expensive cable/streaming TV package. This will allow fans to watch the Kraken for free and help continue to grow the fanbase for the Seattle Kraken. What a pleasant surprise!
Darren – I shouldn’t have been surprised by this, but I was a little surprised at how good Shane Wright looked in his call-up at the end of the season. He truly looked like a different player. For some reason, I expected him to come back up and still appear a little behind at the NHL level, but he showed me he is ready to make the team next season and potentially be an impactful player. That was exciting to see.
Reason to be optimistic
John – I believe the greatest strength of this franchise lies in its prospect pool, extending far beyond Coachella Valley. Numerous Kraken prospects playing in juniors or European leagues have been excelling in their respective teams.
Across the pond, Jani Nyman concluded the Liiga season in Finland by earning the Red Bull helmet, awarded to the top goal scorer under 20 years old. Oscar Fisker-Molgaard, drafted in the 2023 NHL Entry Draft, saw significant ice time as a second-line center in the Swedish Hockey League, one of the world’s premier leagues. Additionally, Niklas Kokko has served as the starting goalie for Pelicans, currently competing in the Liiga finals.
In the CHL, Carson Rehkopf, a 2023 second-round selection, capped off his OHL season with an impressive 52 goals. David Goyette, drafted in 2022’s second round, led the OHL in points. Meanwhile, Jagger Firkus dominated the WHL with an astonishing 61 goals and 126 points.
Blaiz – Andre Burakovsky had a terrible year with 16 points in 49 games. The Swedish winger is too talented to continue to remain off the scoresheet. I wrote about Burakovsky’s struggles earlier this year. Burakovsky was able to finish the season playing 22 games straight without injury and scored six of his seven goals during that stretch. Hopefully with some stable linemates, he can return to his offensive self and be a strong contributor to fixing the Kraken’s scoring woes.
Darren – In that same realm, Blaiz, it was good to see Matty Beniers get going a little more toward the end of the season. He’s still very slight in stature, so I’m interested to see what he can do with a full offseason of training. Can he put on some weight this summer and come back more prepared to handle the physical nature of the NHL?
I’m also excited about what this team might do to improve this offseason. It has cap space and an improving prospect pool, plus plenty of motivation to get better. When you look at how this season played out, Seattle is not that far from being a scary team again, but it will need an injection of offense from the front office. These should be a few interesting months ahead.
Reason to be pessimistic
John – It’s highly unlikely that Tomas Tatar, Pierre-Edouard Bellemare, Kailer Yamamoto, and Justin Schultz will return to the Kraken next season. I expect Shane Wright to claim one of the vacated spots and Ryker Evans to become a regular in the lineup next season. This leaves only one starting forward position available, and it’s unclear whether one new addition to the lineup can make a significant impact on such a key position.
Blaiz – There could still be a lack of scoring next season. I was glad to see general manager Ron Francis acknowledge this issue in his end-of-season presser. There are many players that scored below their career averages this year, although next season, Burakovsky, Beniers, and Jaden Schwartz should rebound a bit and add somewhere between 18 and 23 goals. The prospect pool is impressive, but those players are also not fully baked, and outside of Wright, the prospects are all still one-to-two seasons out. It would be a nice surprise if one of them could contribute meaningfully to the Kraken scoring, but that is a lot to put on any rookie.
Darren – It was painfully obvious to me that the Kraken needed to add a weapon or two last offseason, and I would argue they iced a significantly worse roster this season. I’m just afraid Francis might be a little too cautious for his own good again this summer at a time when some bigger swings feel necessary.
Prospect you are most excited about
Blaiz – Shane Wright has been the prospect I am most excited about since Seattle drafted him fourth overall in 2022. Due to his lost season during the pandemic, Wright was developmentally one year behind Beniers when he was drafted. Now with the two years under his belt in the Kraken development system, Wright looks poised to make the jump full-time to the Kraken. My hot take is Wright will be the Kraken first-line center within the next three years. This is nothing against Beniers, who I think will also rebound and continue to develop next year, but the offensive ceiling is higher for Wright. I am super excited to have Beniers and Wright be the Kraken’s one-two punch for years to come.
Darren – Yeah, Wright is the obvious answer here, and you may be onto something with him as the top center. Either way, Beniers and Wright should serve as a very nice top-two center duo a couple seasons from now. BUT… since you went with Wright, I’ll go in a different direction here and say Jani Nyman (leaving Carson Rehkopf for you, John). I think Nyman will need a year in the AHL to work on his skating and getting used to the North American game, but his size and shot are pretty exciting attributes. If he can get a little faster working with Jess Campbell, I think he could be a player in a couple years.
John – I am excited about Shane, but I am particularly enthusiastic about Rehkopf (thanks for the layup, Darren). I’ve been consistently impressed by his knack for scoring goals from all areas of the ice throughout the season. He appears to be one of the most talented shooters ever in the Kraken’s prospect pool. In my view, the Kraken should seriously consider giving him an opportunity to make the team next season. At the very least, he deserves a chance to start the season with the team and play some regular-season NHL games.
The Seattle Kraken will have a new TV broadcast home for the foreseeable future, the team announced Thursday morning. After three seasons with ROOT Sports as the flagship television network for the team, the Kraken will partner with TEGNA (KING 5 and KONG) in a “multi-year agreement.” All games that haven’t been picked up for national coverage will be viewable on KONG, and a handful of games will also be simulcast on KING 5.
Additionally, the team has entered into a new first-of-its-kind partnership with Prime Video, which will allow streaming of all locally broadcasted games to Prime members for no additional cost.
These new deals should make games more accessible for local viewers, who will now be able to watch Kraken hockey “over the air,” even without a cable subscription (a simple cheap antenna should get you access to both KING 5 and KONG), or with a more economical streaming option than before.
“ROOT has been a terrific partner for us; we have appreciated their support as we determined our broadcast plans moving forward,” said Kraken owner, Sam Holloway in a press release. “Today’s announcement is a game changer for our fans. Our goal is to increase the ways they can watch our games – whether they’re cheering us on at home or on the go. To have both TEGNA and Prime Video as trusted partners is a dream come true. I can’t wait for more fans to fall in love with Kraken hockey.”
The viewing area for both the over-the-air option and the streaming option will cover Washington, Oregon, and Alaska (KGW in Portland and KREM in Spokane will carry the games, since KONG and KING 5 are not readily available in those markets).
Why move away from ROOT?
The broadcast team at ROOT did a fantastic job. We’ve watched plenty of local broadcasts from other markets, and we can honestly say (biases aside) that the Kraken broadcast has been one of, if not the best in the business over the past three seasons.
But there were barriers for fans or potential fans to access games on TV, and limited streaming options made games on ROOT difficult to find without some sort of significant financial investment from viewers.
The content wasn’t the issue. The issue was simply that for fans to watch ROOT, they not only needed a cable subscription like Xfinity, they also got an added kick recently of having to pay even more for an elevated tier to access the sports network.
For those that had switched out of cable, Fubo TV was a fine solution, but to get ROOT, “cord cutters” still had to pay north of $100 per month.
Now, there are more economical (and even free) options available to viewers, a huge win for Kraken fans.
What’s happening with the broadcast team?
Up to now, games have been produced mostly by ROOT employees and/or contractors, with some Kraken personnel factoring in. Moving forward, production of the games will not be handed over to TEGNA, though their employees will certainly be involved.
Instead, a lot of the production will now be done “in house” by the Kraken, meaning more of the individuals working on the show will be team employees, and they will use some of TEGNA’s existing infrastructure. This is a shift from how things were being done previously and (we assume) gives the team a bit more control over branding, graphics, visuals, etc.
The difficult piece here is that there are good people at ROOT who did a great job on broadcasts for three seasons that are now facing uncertainty. On the flipside, we wouldn’t be surprised to see the Kraken hire some of these individuals who have already been part of the show.
As for the on-air broadcast team, all the Kraken employees that you became accustomed to seeing will be around next season. So, we expect John Forslund, Eddie Olczyk, JT Brown, Alison Lukan, and Nick Olczyk to continue participating in 2024-25.
Other on-air personalities that appeared on games previously are ROOT employees, including Piper Shaw. Currently, there isn’t much that we can share on this front.
Good news for Kraken fans
Whichever way you slice it, this is a positive move for Kraken fans. Our hope is that it will truly allow the team to reach more new fans and get hooks into more casual fans to turn them into diehards. The franchise has done a solid job of building its brand locally, but we have wondered about the true reach beyond the Seattle metro area. This is a huge shift that should really help on this front.
Darren Brown
Darren Brown is the Chief Content Officer at soundofhockey.com and the host of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast. He is a member of the PHWA and is also usually SOH’s Twitter intern (but please pretend you don’t know that). Follow him @DarrenFunBrown and @sound_hockey or email darren@soundofhockey.com.
After San Jose Sharks goalie Devin Cooley stole a 3-1 win from the Seattle Kraken last Thursday, making a whopping 49 saves for just his second NHL victory, the lanky netminder was visibly elated to have had one of the best performances of his life. Jovial as can be, Cooley said during the game he had been reciting wonky phrases to himself like, “There are no thoughts, there is no future, there are no thoughts, there is no future,” and, “Nothing matters, nobody cares, nothing matters, nobody cares.”
The 26-year-old said those little sayings keep him “grounded” in net, as he tries to clear his mind during games.
That line, “Nobody cares,” rang a goalie-related bell. It’s one we’ve heard from Seattle Kraken backstop Joey Daccord when we’ve talked to him about his mindset in the crease. And it is not a coincidence that the two players say similar things to themselves to stay focused on the task at hand.
Cooley and Daccord—who faced each other that night for the first time in the NHL—are good friends who have trained together in offseasons since they were teenagers. But it’s more than just a training partnership. In a way, Cooley says he owes a big portion of his success to Joey and his dad, Brian Daccord.
Raw talent
Joey Daccord and Cooley met in the USHL when they became batterymates for the Muskegon Lumberjacks. Daccord said Cooley arrived in the middle of the 2015-16 training camp and wasn’t expected to be his goalie partner for the season. But Cooley got a chance to show what he could do in a game against one of the USA NTDP squads and earned his way onto the Lumberjacks.
Devin Cooley in net against the Seattle Kraken on April 11. (Photo/Brian Liesse)
“He stood on his head,” Daccord remembered. “He played awesome, and I remember he was so big and so athletic, but I just was thinking, ‘This guy needs some real goalie coaching. He’s so talented.’ You could just tell he had that raw athletic ability.”
That was the rub for Cooley at the time. Born in the hockey not-so-hotbed of Los Gatos, Calif., and a product of the San Jose Junior Sharks program, he arrived in the USHL without having ever received full-time goalie coaching.
Unsurprisingly, 2015-16 was a rough season for Cooley, who posted a 4.28 goals-against average and .873 save percentage in 19 games for Muskegon. But as Cooley floundered, he and Daccord formed a close friendship and began working together after practices.
“During that year, I was really struggling,” Cooley said. “I think I was last place in save percentage and goals-against average, and Joey kind of took me under his wing and was like my coach during juniors and just gave me a lot of tips and stuff.”
Daccord said he thought that with Cooley’s size and agility, there was something there for him to become a special goalie.
“I saw a real opportunity,” Daccord said. “He’s a great goalie, a great kid. We were just buddies, and I could see how much potential he had. We had a lot of fun doing that, and he’s always been a very curious kid. Like, he always wanted to get better, always wanted to improve, always asked questions, that kind of thing.”
It so happened that Joey knew a guy who could help Cooley more than even he could. Daccord’s father, Brian, is a pro goalie coach and founder of Stop It Goaltending in Massachusetts.
“Towards the end of year, [Joey] was like, ‘Hey, what are you doing this the summer?’” Cooley recalled. “He’s like, ‘You want to come train like with my dad in Boston?’ I was like, ‘Yeah, absolutely. That’d be great,’ so I went one summer, and I absolutely loved it, and then I’ve been going ever since.”
The right coaching
Enter Brian Daccord, who played seven years in the Swiss National ‘A’ League, and has since held such roles as Boston Bruins goalie coach, director of goalie operations for the Arizona Coyotes, and goalie coach for Boston University. Brian has taught countless elite-level goalies at his camp over the years, from Cory Schneider to Chris Driedger to his son, Joey.
Brian immediately saw in Cooley what Joey had seen.
“If you look at baseball players, when they go into training camp, they always go back and they start hitting off a tee,” the elder Daccord said. “And I think what we had to do was have Devin take a step back and work on some of the mechanics and the muscle memory that goes into either making saves or through his structure, and then kind of pulling him back a step so we can move two forward.”
Brian said he remembered Cooley showing up that first summer, getting himself an eight-week-long AirBNB rental, and going to work every day on his game. He said Cooley is a guy that has to be pulled off the ice because he is always working hard to improve.
“A nice thing about Devin is that he recognized where he needed to work, and that was more on the technical part of his game, the structural part of the game,” Brian said. “He’s a tremendous athlete, but he hadn’t maybe spent as much time on the technical game as he would have liked.”
Part of what gets discussed at camp is the mental side of the goalie position, which explains where Joey and Devin got that “nobody cares” mantra.
“That’s a me thing, I say it all the time,” Brian Daccord said. “If you walk into a rink, no one cares if your flight was late, and you didn’t get in until three o’clock in the morning. No one cares that your pads got stuck somewhere, and you had to use your backup pair of pads. No one cares if you’ve got a cold, no one cares if your girlfriend just broke up with you, no one cares. When you step on the ice, it’s time to perform, regardless, so you can’t use anything that happens to you as a crutch.”
High praise for the Daccords
Joey didn’t have to help Cooley. Teenage goalie tandems can be quite competitive with one another, as they grapple with tension-creating issues like uneven playing time. But Daccord didn’t see it that way. Instead, he went out of his way to help mold his buddy into a future pro, and Cooley has not forgotten this.
Joey Daccord facing the Sharks on April 11. (Photo/Brian Liesse)
“If you were to ask me in juniors, ‘Hey, how do you play this situation?’ or, ‘How do you make this save?’ I had no idea,” Cooley said. “I was just going out there and winging it. I had no clue what I was doing, but I had a lot of size, I was quick, I was mobile, and so I think they saw that raw talent. With the right coaching, [they thought] I could really make a lot of progress.
“Without them, without Joey and his dad and his family, I definitely wouldn’t be standing here right now. So there’s a lot of credit to him. I’m super thankful for him.”
Joey was flattered to know that Cooley had said that about him, but he sent the praise right back to the Sharks goalie.
“I think it’s really cool to be included in something like that, but at the end of the day, he put in the work, he put in the effort, and I think that’s the coolest part about the whole thing is he grinded,” Daccord said. “He put in the work, and he’s earned what he’s gotten.”
Two buddies in the NHL
The game on Thursday wasn’t the first time Cooley and Daccord had crossed paths in competition. They faced each other in the AHL Western Conference Finals last season and both backed up for their respective NHL teams in a 4-2 Kraken win at the Sharks on April 1.
But this was the first time the two had actually played one another in the world’s best hockey league, so it was a special moment for both.
“It’s just the coolest thing ever that we’re getting to play each other in the NHL,” Daccord said.
The two exchanged text messages before the game, wishing one another good luck, and although Daccord was not pleased with the outcome, he was happy to see his buddy succeed, and the feeling has been mutual from Cooley’s side.
“It’s been awesome to see [Joey] this year,” Cooley said. “He’s been absolutely killing it, so it’s been really cool to see. I’ve been getting a little jealous, though, especially at the beginning of the year; I wanted to do that. He’s been a blast to watch.”
Header photo: Joey Daccord and Devin Cooley pose before an April 1 game between the Seattle Kraken and San Jose Sharks. Photo courtesy Seattle Kraken.
Darren Brown
Darren Brown is the Chief Content Officer at soundofhockey.com and the host of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast. He is a member of the PHWA and is also usually SOH’s Twitter intern (but please pretend you don’t know that). Follow him @DarrenFunBrown and @sound_hockey or email darren@soundofhockey.com.
You know how NHLers sometimes appear to have eyes in the backs of their heads? Well, they don’t, but they can often make educated guesses without looking behind them that one of their linemates will be there if they make a drop pass at the top of the slot or fling a blind backhander across the blue line.
It’s not a perfect science, but it is all by design. Hockey looks chaotic at times, but on every inch of the ice, teams have a plan. Players are supposed to be heading to specific places, skating in specific directions and routes, and covering specific areas to make themselves “predictable” to their teammates.
“If you know where your teammate’s going to be based on structure, it’s so much easier to play, and that’s where the skill will take over later on,” Seattle Kraken forward Tomas Tatar said. “But if you don’t have the basics in the structure, then you’re kind of playing without knowing where the other players will be, so that just makes it harder.”
Systems are complicated, and the game is so fluid that it’s sometimes hard to decipher which one a team is deploying. For example, if the Kraken have the puck in the offensive zone, all five players have specific jobs they’re supposed to be doing. But those jobs can change in a flash, depending on where the puck is and what the defense is doing. Maybe the center goes to the slot and waits for a pass while the wing pulls it off the wall, like we saw when Shane Wright scored his second goal of the game against the Ducks last Saturday.
But if the puck is contested along the kick plate in the corner, perhaps all three forwards should be cycling to create confusion for the defense. And once the puck gets turned over, now suddenly the Kraken shift to their offensive-zone forecheck, looking to win the puck back. Fail to do that? Now they’re backchecking, and those switches from system to system all happen instantaneously.
We were curious about how much of what we see at the NHL level is pre-planned and how much is improvised, so we chatted with several Kraken players to find out.
Why systems exist
Systems exist in hockey for several important reasons.
They help players know where their teammates will be in those moments when they have to make split-second decisions. And while it’s still not advised to truly make a blind pass, players can look like wizards by evading pressure with passes into areas where they expect their teammates to be, even if they don’t physically see them there.
When a team has the puck, the offensive systems are all designed to overlap with one another with the goal of creating chances. On the flip side, defensive systems in all three zones are designed to minimize dangerous chances against and win back control of the puck, but they also create redundancies. If one player misses an assignment or gets out of position, there should often be somebody there as a backup.
By operating within the confines of these systems, a player with the puck should typically have multiple options that will allow them to work around what the opposing team is doing defensively.
They take the thinking out of the game for players, because, as Jaden Schwartz said, “Hockey happens so fast, you don’t really have time to think.”
Schwartz succinctly explained the systematic approach to the game from a Kraken perspective. “We do have systems as far as breakouts and going through the neutral zone and guys knowing their roles, not only for them to get the puck, but for them to maybe take a defender with them, and maybe it leaves another guy open. So there’s definitely some parts that we try to do consistently to kind of use our speed and get going offensively.”
The pace of play in the NHL makes structure even more crucial than at lower levels, where players typically have more time to look up, find a target, and make a pass. When an NHL player doesn’t have enough time to do that, they can often rely on the team’s structure and their muscle memory to make a quick play and (hopefully) keep the puck heading in the right direction.
Reading and reacting
Of course, the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry, and that’s why NHL players also need elite skill to go with their understanding of their team’s structure. Rarely can a player simply follow a route as it’s drawn up on the whiteboard, make a pass to a linemate that is exactly where the coach told them to be, and watch them go in and score. It just doesn’t work that way.
“It’s usually just a read-and-react, instincts kind of thing because we have gameplans, but it depends on where [the opponents] are and what they’re doing a little bit,” Schwartz said. “Usually you’re just kind of playing off instincts and reading and reacting and kind of taking what they give you. But that kind of affects what you’re going to do with the puck and where the guys are going to go.”
So, within the systems, players have the freedom to make their own reads and try to create, based on what is happening in front of them. When you see a forward line that has “good chemistry,” it means that even when they aren’t following to a T what the team structure tells them to do, they’re still able to make an effective play by inherently knowing where their teammate is going.
“I think a lot of it for me is reading the play, understanding where the space is, and then obviously repetition of when you’re with guys and you’ve played with them for a while, that chemistry,” Jordan Eberle said. “[You learn] tendencies and things they like to do, and that kind of helps you make your thought process a little bit quicker and makes things predictable, which, for me, is how you play fast.”
It’s almost like the structure and the game plans give the players a loose roadmap to the ice, but then there are a million different paths they can take to get to the same destination, depending on what obstacles they face.
3-on-2 (or 4-on-2?) rushes
In these last couple Kraken games, a good example that you can look for to see players making reads in real time is when they get a 3-on-2 rush that starts in the neutral zone. When this happens, the puck carrier makes a decision, and the other two attackers try to do something that will increase the team’s chances to score.
There are a few options for the puck carrier on a 3-on-2 rush. For one, they can stay along the boards and buy time for the other attackers to go hard to the net, looking for a pass and a tap-in. The puck carrier can also cut hard to the middle, which can lead to a cross-and-drop, or another angle for a netmouth tap-in. Or, they could simply funnel the puck to the net, meaning the puck carrier stays wide and shoots from distance, hoping for a rebound to one of the other two attackers who are straight-lining it to the top of the crease.
As the puck carrier is making this decision, the other attackers need to be recognizing what the carrier is doing and moving in a way that either makes them an option for a pass or gives them body position to win a rebound. So, there’s a lot happening in a play that lasts under five seconds. It’s a good example, though, of how teams have general guidelines for what they’re supposed to do, but the players still need to make their own real-time decisions on the ice.
A 3-on-2 rush can often lead to chances, but a 4-on-2 rush tends to create even more dangerous opportunities. But there are only three forwards on the ice at any given time, so who is the fourth player in that scenario? Well, it’s a defenseman of, course. Activating a defenseman on the rush is something Seattle does regularly, but it can be risky. If the Kraken turn the puck over or even get a big rebound off the goalie’s pads, it can lead to an odd-man rush in the other direction.
“We like getting our D involved and keeping plays alive,” Jamie Oleksiak said. “It confuses coverage when there’s a lot of movement and guys kind of coming up and down, and depending on how the team is playing, it could create some confusion and some opportunities to create offense. I think it’s kind of a systematic thing, just in terms of where guys are coming, and a big part of it is the D-man as well as just knowing that you have that forward support coming back to back you up so you can take those chances down low.”
Indeed, if the defenseman jumps up into the play at the wrong time and doesn’t have their partner or a forward trailing that can get back and help, that defenseman can leave their goalie hung out to dry.
“There’s so many different factors that go into it, like at what point in the game it is, what the score is,” Oleksiak said. “But I think for the most part, teams are so good defensively at getting coverage back that you kind of need that fourth or fifth guy to join in a rush and give you that option and kind of space things out a little bit. But it’s really up to [the defenseman’s] discretion. You’ve got to read the point of the game, the momentum, and if you’re up a goal or two, maybe you don’t take that chance. Maybe you play a little bit more conservatively.”
Oleksiak added that facing a 4-on-2 rush is a “worst-case scenario” for a defenseman, who can only cover so much of the ice.
The Kraken were victimized by a defenseman jumping up in the play last week against the Sharks. Here, Seattle had even numbers back for what appeared to be a nothing play. But Kyle Burroughs jumped up and made himself available to William Eklund, and Burroughs potted the eventual winning goal.
The other thing we learned from these conversations about Seattle’s tactics was teams that execute the best within their systems are the ones that look the fastest. The margins of skill and physical speed are slim from player to player and team to team in the NHL, which is what makes execution so critical.
“I honestly think there’s not many teams left who are not fast,” Tatar said. “The league is getting faster and faster, and I feel like everybody wants to play fast. Some teams are faster than other ones, but the concept of playing fast is pretty much everywhere.
“The good teams just know, playing very structurally, and this helps the speed, and all of a sudden the team looks super fast.”
This was the biggest difference we saw between the Kraken and some of their better opponents this season. When you saw the Dallas Stars (for example) cruise through the neutral zone with ease against Seattle in two recent matchups, they looked lightning quick. You would see a one-touch pass in the middle of the ice, in which a Stars forward would catch another one perfectly in stride, and suddenly Dallas was in perfect position in the offensive zone with Seattle on its heels.
Darren Brown
Darren Brown is the Chief Content Officer at soundofhockey.com and the host of the Sound Of Hockey Podcast. He is a member of the PHWA and is also usually SOH’s Twitter intern (but please pretend you don’t know that). Follow him @DarrenFunBrown and @sound_hockey or email darren@soundofhockey.com.
Regardless of the playoff picture, I still enjoy watching the Kraken right now, especially when they win. The Kraken completed their California swing with wins against the Sharks and Ducks and a loss to the Kings in between. Sure, the victories were against two of the weaker teams in the league, but wins are wins, and you certainly wouldn’t want to see them lose to those teams, would you?
Shane Wright looks good
In my limited viewing of Coachella Valley Firebirds games and discussions I’ve had with people inside the Kraken, Shane Wright’s development has been very positive this season. The 20-year-old center has looked impressive since being called up on March 31, though I understand it has only been a few games. While I am excited about Shane, I remain cautious with prospects, knowing there’s an inherent bias in valuing something you possess. Nonetheless, we can appreciate what we’ve seen from him so far.
He scored a goal in his first game against the Sharks and added two against the Ducks on Friday night. However, his contributions extend beyond goal scoring. Wright plays sound defense, delivers quick, creative passes, and consistently positions himself well for scoring. He did make a few mistakes in his three games so far, but these should serve as learning opportunities.
When he was called up for three games in November, Wright appeared competent but cautious, often opting for the safe play to avoid errors. Although he wasn’t on a line with Jordan Eberle and Jaden Schwartz that time, which might have altered his current role with the big club, he now exudes more confidence and poses a greater threat on the ice than before.
Tremendous give and go between Wright and Schwartz in the neutral zone and then another that ends in a royal road feed from Eberle to Wright for the goal pic.twitter.com/pn3bs2wj9I
When evaluating Shane Wright’s development, I often compare it to the development path of Quinton Byfield, the Los Angeles Kings’ centerman. Their paths are not identical, but Wright and Byfield share similarities. Byfield, drafted second overall in the 2020 NHL Entry Draft, was an OHL player. Due to the pandemic, he was allowed to spend his draft-plus-one season in the AHL and began playing most of his games in the NHL from the 2021-22 season onwards. However, it wasn’t until this season, four years after his draft year, that Byfield began to hit his stride at the top level, just as pundits were speculating that he might be a bust.
Shane is currently in his draft-plus-two season and, by all indications, will become a regular in the NHL next year, his draft-plus-three season. If he follows Byfield’s trajectory, we might not see his full capabilities in the NHL until 2025-26. The broader point is that we still need to be patient. What we should look for is progress in his development, which we have undoubtedly observed since he joined the franchise.
Other Musings
Friday’s win against the Ducks was Seattle’s eighth regular-season win against Anaheim since the inception of the Kraken, the most wins they have posted against any one team. The Kraken have the chance to beat the Sharks for the eighth time on Thursday in Seattle.
Logan Morrison and Ryan Winterton were scratched from games this week, a strategy often deployed when developing players to provide them with a different perspective of the game. This allows them to apply what they have learned from the handful of NHL games they’ve experienced at ice level and observe it from above. We would expect the duo to get another game or two at the NHL level before being sent back to Coachella Valley.
I would not pencil Morrison or Winterton into the lineup next year. Both show promise, but I am not convinced they will be ready to be regular NHLers next season.
Congratulations to Lleyton Roed on scoring his first professional goal on Sunday, just a week after signing his first professional hockey contract.
— x – Coachella Valley Firebirds (@Firebirds) April 8, 2024
After experiencing lots of challenges this season, Matty Beniers has been finding the net more often, with goals in four of his last six games. Below is his 10-game moving average of goals scored per game, which shows his scoring trend over 10 games at a time.
The IIHF Women’s World Championship kicked off last week, and one of the marquee games of the opening round is Canada versus USA at 7 p.m. PT, airing Monday on the NHL Network. Check it out if you are so inclined.
Speaking of international tournaments, it will be interesting to see how many Kraken players will participate in the men’s version of the IIHF World Championships in Czechia, which kick off in May. One player expected to represent Denmark is Kraken prospect Oscar Fisker Mølgaard. I’ve discussed him extensively this year, but this will be an opportunity to see how he fares against a number of NHL players.
The Kansas City Mavericks, the Seattle Kraken’s ECHL affiliate, clinched the Brabham Cup over the weekend, an award given to the top team of the regular season. In full transparency, I had never heard of the Brabham Cup before.
We alluded to it last week, and now it has been confirmed: Jani Nyman is joining the Coachella Valley Firebirds.
The Everett Silvertips closed out their first-round series against the Vancouver Giants on Sunday. They will face the Portland Winterhawks in the second round, which kicks off on Friday in Portland. The Winterhawks won six of the eight regular-season games between the two teams.
Player performances
Niklas Kokko (PEL/SEA) – Since last Monday, the Kraken goalie prospect won a decisive Game 7 in the opening round of the Liiga playoffs and then won the first two games of the semifinal matchup against his former team, Karpat. He has a .925 save percentage in those two games.
David Goyette (SBY/SEA) – The Kraken’s second-round selection from the 2022 NHL Draft had nine points, including four goals, in the Sudbury Wolves’ first-round series win against the Mississauga Steelheads. The Wolves won the series in five games and will now face Ty Nelson and the North Bay Battalion in Round 2.
Shane Wright (SEA) – We’ve talked about him a lot lately, but he has four points in his three games with the Kraken since he was called up.
Goal of the week
The goal of the week comes from the semifinals of the SHL playoffs, Växjö Lakers vs Rögle BK.
The analytics community has long understood that outhitting an opponent in a hockey game does not necessarily lead to more wins. The overarching idea is that if you’re outhitting an opponent, it likely means you don’t have the puck. Recently, I’ve noticed a broad group of media outlets highlighting hitting as if it were a key component of success on the ice. This has made me somewhat uneasy, so I decided to investigate how well the Kraken perform when outhitting opponents versus being outhit this season.
When the Kraken are “close” with their opponent in terms of the number of hits delivered, or they deliver at least four fewer hits than their opponent, their winning percentage is significantly higher.
The week ahead
The Kraken will play their last two home games this week, taking on the Coyotes on Tuesday and the Sharks on Thursday. Despite the challenges of the past six weeks, I’ll be sad to see the season end. I still love watching the team play, and if it weren’t for the unrealistic expectations created by last year’s team, I would have been content with this season. The Kraken are laying the groundwork to become a perennial playoff contender, rather than a team that gambles too early and risks having to rebuild. In short, while I would have been thrilled to see them in the playoffs, I appreciate the direction they’re heading.
I have a personal backlog of offseason analysis and investigation, but please let me know if there’s anything specific you’d like me to focus on as the season winds down.